Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Previous studies of animals observed a phenomenon of adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and found that the phenomenon was mediated to a large extent by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. The present study investigated DPOAE adaptation in humans. The following stimuli were used: f2/f1 = 1.2; f2 = 2, 4, or 5.65 kHz; L2 = 50-65 dB SPL re 20 microPa rms, L1 - L2 = 0-15 dB, where L1 and L2 represent levels of the f1 and f2 tones, respectively; duration of two-tone burst = 5.5 s; interburst gap = 20 or 30 s; number of repetitions = 40 or 64. We analyzed the 2f1 - f2 DPOAE as a function of time using a method of heterodyne envelope detection. The subjects were 20 humans aged from 15 to 54 years (median = 21 years) with normal hearing. We observed that (1) humans exhibited DPOAE adaptation phenomenon; (2) the time course of DPOAE level was characterized by a 2-exponential function; (3) distributions of the fast and slow time constants were well separated with their median values being 69 ms and 1.51 s, respectively; (4) distributions of the magnitudes of the fast and slow adaptation components were largely overlapped with their median values being 0.65 and 0.40 dB, respectively; and (5) the combined magnitude of the adaptation ranged from 0.4 to 3.0 dB with a median of 1.10 dB. To our knowledge, the present study is the first published article to describe adaptation of DPOAE in humans. These results should help advance the basic knowledge of human cochlear mechanics operating under the control of the MOC feedback system and contribute to the development of practical applications such as identifying people at high risk of acoustical injury and a clinical test of the functional status of the MOC system.

Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears.

Primary and secondary sources combine to produce the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measured in the ear canals of humans. DPOAEs were obtained in nine normal-hearing subjects using a fixed-f2 paradigm in which f1 was varied. The f2 was 2 or 4 kHz, and absolute and relative primary levels were varied. Data were obtained with and without a third tone (f3) placed 15.6 Hz below 2f1-f2. The level of f3 was varied in order to suppress the stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) coming from the 2f1-f2 place. These data were converted from the complex frequency domain into an equivalent time representation using an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT). IFFTs of unsuppressed DPOAE data were characterized by two or more peaks. Relative amplitudes of these peaks depended on overall primary level and on primary-level differences. The suppressor eliminated later peaks, but early peaks remained relatively unaltered. Results are interpreted to mean that the DPOAE measured in humans includes components from the f2 place (intermodulation distortion) and DP place (in the form of a SFOAE). These findings build on previous work by providing evidence that multiple peaks in the IFFT are due to a secondary source at the DP place.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions were measured at 7f2 frequencies (1 to 8 kHz; f2/f1 = 1.22) over a range of levels (-5 to 95 dB SPL) in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. L1-L2 was level dependent in order to produce the largest 2f1-f2 responses in normal ears. System distortion was determined by collecting DP data in six different acoustic cavities. These data were used to derive a multiple linear regression model to predict system distortion levels. The model was tested on cochlear-implant users and used to estimate system distortion in all other ears. At most but not all f2's, measurements in cochlear implant ears were consistent with model predictions. At all f2 frequencies, the ears with normal auditory thresholds produced I/O functions characterized by compressive nonlinear regions at moderate levels, with more rapid growth at low and high stimulus levels. As auditory threshold increased, DPOAE threshold increased, accompanied by DPOAE amplitude reductions, notably over the range of levels where normal ears showed compression. The slope of the I/O function was steeper in impaired ears. The data from normal-hearing ears resembled direct measurements of basilar membrane displacement in lower animals. Data from ears with hearing loss showed that the compressive region was affected by cochlear damage; however, responses at high levels of stimulation resembled those observed in normal ears.

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a wide range of frequencies and two stimulus levels in neonates and infants. 2) To describe the relations between these DPOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time. DESIGN: DPOAEs were measured in 2348 well babies without risk indicators, 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). DPOAE and noise levels were measured at f2 frequencies of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, and for primary levels (L1/L2) of 65/50 dB SPL and 75/75 dB SPL. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response was at least 3 dB above the mean noise floor + 2 SDs (SNR) for at least four of five test frequencies. The test would terminate, however, if these criteria were not met after 360 sec. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of each test. RESULTS: DPOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for well babies without risk indicators, well babies with risk indicators, and NICU graduates. There was a tendency for larger responses at f2 frequencies of 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, compared with 3.0 and 4.0 kHz; however, the noise levels systematically decreased as frequency increased, resulting in the most favorable SNRs at 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. Response levels were least and noise levels highest for an f2 frequency of 1.0 kHz. In addition, test time to achieve automatic stopping criteria was greatest for 1.0 kHz. With the exception of "active/alert" and "crying" babies, baby state had little influence on DPOAE measurements. Additionally, test environment had little impact on these measurements, at least for the environments in which babies were tested in this study. However, the lowest SNRs were observed for infants who were tested in functioning isolettes. Finally, there were some subtle age affects on DPOAE levels, with the infants born most prematurely producing the smallest responses, regardless of age at the time of test. CONCLUSIONS: DPOAE measurements in neonates and infants result in robust responses in the vast majority of ears for f2 frequencies of at least 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. SNRs decrease as frequency decreases, making the measurements less reliable at 1.0 kHz. When considered along with test time, there may be little justification for including an f2 frequency at 1.0 kHz in newborn screening programs. It would appear that DPOAEs result in reliable measurements when tests are conducted in the environments in which babies typically are found. Finally, these data suggest that babies can be tested in those states of arousal that are most commonly encountered in the perinatal period.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.

The objective of this study was to determine whether distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test performance, defined as its ability to distinguish normal-hearing ears from those with hearing loss, can be improved by examining response and noise amplitudes at 2 f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 simultaneously. In addition, there was interest in knowing whether measurements at both DPs and for several primary frequency pairs can be used in a multivariate analysis to further optimize test performance. DPOAE and noise amplitudes were measured at 2f1-f2 and 2 f2-f1 for 12 primary levels (L2 from 10 to 65 dB SPL in 5-dB steps) and 9 pairs of primary frequencies (0.5 to 8 kHz in 1/2-octave steps). All data were collected in a sound-treated room from 70 subjects with normal hearing and 80 subjects with hearing loss. Subjects had normal middle-ear function at the time of the DPOAE test, based on standard tympanometric measurements. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that the test terminated when the noise floor around the 2 f1-f2 DP was < or = -30 dB SPL or after 32 s of artifact-free averaging, whichever occurred first. Data were analyzed using clinical decision theory in which relative operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and areas under the ROC curves were estimated. In addition, test performance was assessed by selecting the criterion value that resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and determining the specificity at that criterion value. Data were analyzed using traditional univariate comparisons, in which predictions about auditory status were based only on data obtained when f2 = audiometric frequency. In addition, multivariate analysis techniques were used to determine whether test performance can be optimized by using many variables to predict auditory status. As expected, DPOAEs were larger for 2f1-f2 compared to 2 f2-f1 in subjects with normal hearing. However, noise amplitudes were smaller for 2f2-f1, but this effect was restricted to the lowest f2 frequencies. A comparison of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) within normal-hearing ears showed that the 2f1-f2 DP was more frequently characterized by larger SNRs compared to 2f2-f1. However, there were several subjects in whom 2f2-f1 produced a larger SNR. ROC curve areas and specificities for a fixed sensitivity increased only slightly when data from both DPs were used to predict auditory status. Multivariate analyses, in which the inputs included both DPs for several primary frequency pairs surrounding each audiometric frequency, produced the highest areas and specificities. Thus, DPOAE test performance was improved slightly by examining data at two DP frequencies simultaneously. This improvement was achieved at no additional cost in terms of test time. When measurements at both DPs were combined with data obtained for several primary frequency pairs and then analyzed in a multivariate context, the best test performance was achieved. Excellent test performance (ROC) curve areas >0.95% and specificities >92% at all frequencies, including 500 Hz, were achieved for these conditions. Although the results described should be validated on an independent set of data, they suggest that the accuracy with which DPOAE measurements identify auditory status can be improved with multivariate analyses and measurements at multiple DPs.

Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) frequency functions were measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. A fixed-f2/swept-f1 paradigm was used with f2 fixed at half-octave intervals from 1 to 8 kHz. L1 was always 10 dB greater than L2, and L2 was varied from 65 to 10 dB SPL in 5-dB steps. The responses were quantified by the frequency and amplitude of the peak response. Peak responses were closer to f2 in higher frequency regions and for lower intensity stimulation. Results from hearing-impaired subjects suggest that audiometric thresholds at the distortion product frequency, fdp, in addition to hearing status at f2, can affect DPOAE results. Results are discussed in terms of several manifestations of a second resonance model, as well as a dual source model for the generation of DPOAEs as measured in the ear canal of humans. It appears that a dual source model accounts for the data better than second filter models.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test performance when a priori response criteria are applied to a large set of DPOAE data. 2) To describe DPOAE test performance when multifrequency definitions of auditory function are used. 3) To determine DPOAE test performance when a single decision regarding auditory status is made for an ear, based on DPOAE data from several frequencies. 4) To compare univariate and multivariate test performance when multifrequency gold standard definitions and response criteria are applied to DPOAE data. DESIGN: DPOAE and audiometric data were analyzed from 1267 ears of 806 subjects. These data were evaluated for three different frequency combinations (2, 3, 4 kHz; 2, 3, 4, 6 kHz; 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 kHz). DPOAE data were collected for each of the f2 frequencies listed above, using primary levels (L1/L2) of 65/55 dB SPL and a primary ratio (f2/f1) of 1.22. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for signal to noise ratios (SNRs) of 3, 6, and 9 dB, which are in common clinical use. In addition, test performance was evaluated using clinical decision theory, following the convention we have used in previous reports on otoacoustic emission test performance. Both univariate and multivariate analyses techniques were applied to the data. In addition to evaluating DPOAE test performance for the case when audiometric and f2 frequency were equal, multifrequency gold standards and multifrequency criterion responses were evaluated. Three new gold standards were used to assess test performance: average pure-tone thresholds, extrema thresholds that took into account both the magnitude of the loss and the number of frequencies at which hearing loss existed, and a combination of the two. These new gold standards were applied to each of the three frequency groups described above. RESULTS: As expected, SNR criteria of 3, 6, and 9 dB never resulted in perfect DPOAE test performance. Even the most stringent of these criteria (9 dB SNR) did not result in a sensitivity of 100%. This result suggests that caution should be exercised in the interpretation of DPOAE test results when these a priori criteria are used clinically. Excellent test performance was achieved when auditory status was classified on the basis of the new gold standards and when either SNR or the output of multivariate logistic regressions (LRs) were used as criterion measures. Invariably, the LR resulted in superior test performance compared with what was achieved by the SNR. For SNR criteria of 3, 6, and 9 dB and (by definition) for the LR, specificity, in general, exceeded 80% and often was greater than 90%. Sensitivity, however, depended on the magnitude of hearing loss. Diagnostic errors, when they occurred, were more common for patients with mild hearing losses (21 to 40 dB HL); sensitivity approached 100% once the hearing loss exceeded 40 dB HL. The largest differences between test performance based on SNR or LR occurred for the ears with mild hearing loss, where the LR resulted in more accurate diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: It should not be assumed that the use of a priori response criteria, such as SNRs of 3, 6, or 9 dB, will identify all ears with hearing loss. Test performance when multifrequency gold standards are used to define an ear as normal or impaired and when data from multiple f2 frequencies are used to make a diagnosis, resulted in excellent test performance, especially when the LR was used. When predicting auditory status with multifrequency gold standards, the LR resulted in relative operating characteristic curve areas of 0.95 or 0.96. An output from the LR can be selected that results in a specificity of 90% or better. When the loss exceeded 40 dB HL, the same output from the LR resulted in test sensitivity of nearly 100%. These were the best test results that were achieved. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine whether multivariate statistical approaches improve the classification of normal and impaired ears based on distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements, in comparison with the results obtained with more traditional single-variable applications of clinical decision theory. 2) To determine how well the multivariate predictors, derived from analysis on a training group, generalized to a validation group. 3) To provide a way to apply the multivariate approaches clinically. DESIGN: Areas under the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve and cumulative distributions derived from DPOAE, DPOAE/Noise, discriminant function (DF) scores and logit function (LF) scores were used to compare univariate and multivariate predictors of audiometric status. DPOAE and Noise amplitudes for 8 f2 frequencies were input to a discriminant analysis and to a logistic regression. These analyses generated a DF and LF, respectively, composed of a linear combination of selected variables. The DF and LF scores were the input variables to the decision theory analyses. For comparison purposes, DPOAE test performance was also evaluated using only one variable (DPOAE or DPOAE/Noise when f2 = audiometric frequency). Analyses were based on data from over 1200 ears of 806 subjects, ranging in age from 1.3 to 96 yr, with thresholds ranging from -5 to >120 dB HL. For statistical purposes, normal hearing was defined as thresholds of 20 dB HL or better. For the multivariate analyses, the database was randomly divided into two groups of equal size. One group served as the "training" set, which was used to generate the DFs and LFs. The other group served as a "validation" set to determine the robustness of the DF and LF solutions. RESULTS: For all test frequencies, multivariate analyses yielded greater areas under the ROC curve than univariate analyses, and greater specificities at fixed sensitivities. Within the multivariate techniques, discriminant analysis and logistic regression yielded similar results and both yielded robust solutions that generalized well to the validation groups. The improvement in test performance with multivariate analyses was greatest for conditions in which the single predictor variable resulted in the poorest performance. CONCLUSIONS: A more accurate determination of auditory status at a specific frequency can be obtained by combining multiple predictor variables. Although the DF and LF multivariate approaches resulted in the greatest separation between normal and impaired distributions, overlap still exists, which suggests that there would be value in continued efforts to improve DPOAE test performance.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) test performance when measurements are made under routine clinical conditions. 2) To evaluate TEOAE test performance as a function of frequency and as a function of the magnitude of hearing loss. 3) To compare test performance using univariate and multivariate approaches to data analyses. 4) To provide a means of interpreting clinical TEOAE measurements. DESIGN: TEOAEs were measured in 452 ears of 246 patients. All measurements were made after acoustic immittance assessments, which were used to demonstrate that middle-ear function was normal at the time of the TEOAE test. TEOAE amplitudes and signal to noise ratios (SNRs), analyzed into octave bands centered at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, were compared with the pure-tone threshold at the same frequencies. Data were analyzed with clinical decision theory, cumulative distributions, discriminant analyses, and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Using univariate analysis techniques, TEOAEs accurately identified auditory status at 2 and 4 kHz but were less accurate at 1 kHz. Test performance was best when audiometric thresholds between 20 and 30 dB HL were used as the criteria for normal hearing. TEOAE SNR resulted in better test performance than did TEOAE amplitude alone; this effect decreased as frequency increased. Multivariate analysis methods resulted in better separation between normal and impaired ears than did univariate approaches, which relied on only TEOAE amplitude or SNR when test frequency band and audiometric frequency were the same. This improvement in test performance was greatest at 1 kHz, decreased as frequency increased, and was negligible at 4 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: TEOAEs can be used to identify hearing loss in children under routine clinical conditions. Univariate tests accurately identified auditory status at mid and high frequencies but performed more poorly at lower frequencies. The decrease in performance as frequency decreases may be a result of increased noise at lower frequencies but also may be due to properties of the measurement paradigm ("QuickScreen," high-pass filter at 0.8 kHz), which would not be ideal for recording energy around 1 kHz. The improvement in test performance when SNR was used and the interaction of this effect with frequency, however, would be consistent with the view that test performance in lower frequencies is at least partially influenced by the level of background noise. Multivariate analysis techniques improved test performance compared with the more traditional univariate approaches to data analysis. An approach is provided that allows one to assign measured TEOAE amplitudes, SNRs, or outputs from multivariate analyses to one of three categories: response properties consistent with normal hearing; results consistent with hearing loss; hearing status undetermined.

Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal.

In-the-ear calibration of sound pressure level may be problematic at frequencies above 2 kHz, because the pressure can vary significantly along the length of the ear canal, due to reflection of sound waves at the eardrum. This issue has been investigated by measuring behavioral thresholds to tones in a group of human subjects (N = 61) for two different insertion depths of an insert earphone. The change in insertion depth was intended to alter the distribution of pressure in the ear canal, shifting the frequency at which spectral notches occur. The inset earphone or "probe" (Etymotic ER-10C) also contained a calibrated microphone, allowing the recording of sound pressure levels in the ear canal. Prior to the threshold measurements in each subject, the Thevenin acoustic source characteristics of the probe were determined by a special calibration procedure. This calibration allowed the expression of the sound level at threshold in terms of acoustic intensity (W/m2). The impact of changes in insertion depth was determined by measuring behavioral threshold at each depth. Because cochlear sensitivity remained constant, the level of sound entering the ear at threshold should have been the same (within measurement error) for both insertions. The difference in sound pressure level (SPL) at threshold between the two probe insertions was greatest at the notch frequency of the first insertion. At this notch frequency, the SPL at threshold increased by an average of 11.4 dB. The change in sound intensity level (SIL) at threshold was almost always less than the change in SPL. At the notch frequency, the SIL decreased, on average, by only 0.5 dB. These results suggest that SIL may be a better indicator than SPL of the sound level entering the ear, especially for frequencies in the 4-8 kHz range.

On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Interactions among age, threshold, and frequency in relation to distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) have yet to be resolved. The effects of these variables were explored by analyzing DPOAEs in ears with thresholds not exceeding 20 dB HL. Multivariate regression analyses were performed in two different ways. For data to be included in the first analysis, audiometric threshold had to be 20 dB HL or better only at the particular frequency under study, but might exceed 20 dB HL at other half-octave frequencies. Significant main effects were found for age, threshold, and frequency. There was also an age-by-frequency interaction, but a significant age-by-threshold interaction was not observed. DPOAE amplitudes decreased as either age, frequency, or threshold increased. In the second analysis, when a more stringent inclusion criterion was applied (normal thresholds at all frequencies), the main effects for age, threshold, and frequency were not significant. The significant age-by-frequency interaction remained, whereby DPOAE amplitudes decreased as age and frequency increased, but the age-by-threshold interaction again was not significant. The magnitude of DPOAE amplitude change across age, threshold, and frequency and for the age-by-frequency interaction was small but similar for both groups of subjects. Age in association with threshold did not account for observed changes in DPOAE amplitudes for either group. Importantly, the lack of a significant age-by-threshold interaction indicates that there may be processes intrinsic to aging alone that act on DPOAE generation.

Efferent innervation of the inner hair cell region: origins and terminations of two lateral olivocochlear systems.

The projections of lateral olivocochlear neurons (LOC), which terminate beneath inner hair cells (IHCs), were investigated by injecting biotinylated dextran amine into the lateral superior olivary nucleus (LSO) and the surrounding region in the rat. This region has been definitively shown to contain two types of olivocochlear neurons: small cells within the LSO (intrinsic neurons) and large cells (shell neurons) surrounding it (Vetter, D.E., Mugnaini, E., 1992. Distribution and dendritic features of three groups of rat olivocochlear neurons. Anat. Embryol. 185, 1-16). Labeled efferent axons were studied by light microscopy in whole mounts and radial sections of the organ of Corti (OC). It was found that injections confined to the LSO, which presumably affected mainly intrinsic neurons, labeled a cluster of axons in the osseous spiral lamina that entered the inner spiral bundle (ISB) and terminated in one or more dense patches that, in total basal-apical extent, spanned no more than 10-20% (1-2 mm) of the total length of the OC (10 mm). In contrast, injections affecting shell neurons produced labeled axons that entered the OC over a span of more than 50% of its length and which, as a group, coursed in the ISB for at least 80%, and sometimes more than 95% of total cochlear length. Study of individual axons in the OC revealed that intrinsic axons did not bifurcate upon entering the OC and traveled less than 1 mm before terminating in a discrete, dense arbor. In contrast, shell axons typically bifurcated into basal and apical branches that, in toto, traveled between 1 and 2 mm beneath the IHCs, forming numerous en passant swellings and a few terminal branches en route. The fact that localized injections of intrinsic neurons produced focal peaks of labeling in the cochlea, whereas similar injections of shell neurons produced a diffuse, non-focal projection that could extend for nearly the entire length of the cochlea, suggests that significant differences exist between these two populations in their capacity to influence localized, frequency-specific regions of the OC, and thus in their probable functional roles. The present findings in the rat not only confirm a previous study in the guinea pig which found a similar dual efferent innervation beneath the IHCs (Brown, M.C., 1987. Morphology of labeled efferent fibers in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol. 260, 605-618), but extend those observations by linking two axonal types beneath the IHCs to their respective cell bodies of origin in the lateral zone of the superior olivary complex.

From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements in large groups of subjects with normal hearing and with hearing loss, and to use these data to provide comprehensive descriptions of DPOAE test performance. 2) To describe the effects of primary frequency and audiometric threshold on the extent to which DPOAE measurements accurately identify auditory status. 3) To develop an approach that describes the probability that any measured response is coming from either a normal or an impaired ear. 4) To develop an approach for representing DPOAE data clinically. 5) To explore the relation between magnitude of hearing loss and DPOAE measurements. DESIGN: DPOAE measurements were made in 1267 ears of 806 subjects, using stimulus conditions that previously had been demonstrated to result in the greatest separation between normal and impaired ears (i.e., primary levels of 65/55 dB SPL for f1/f2; Stover et al., 1996). Subjects were recruited from local clinical populations and through local advertisements. All data were analyzed using clinical decision theory, including relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves and estimates of areas under these curves (Az). In addition, cumulative distributions were constructed of response properties from both normal and hearing-impaired ears. These cumulative distributions were used to select specific probabilities that measured responses were coming from either the normal or impaired distributions, and to develop an approach for describing clinical DPOAE data. RESULTS: For no conditions were the distributions of DPOAE responses from normal and impaired ears completely separated, meaning that optimal criterion values would still result in errors in identification of auditory status. Test performance, defined by Az, was best for mid and high frequencies and poorest for lower frequencies and for the highest frequency tested (8000 Hz). Performance was best when normal hearing was defined as audiometric thresholds between 20 and 30 dB HL, with poorer performance for more stringent or lax audiometric criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits related to the effects of primary frequency and audiometric criterion, it appears that DPOAE measurements can be used to accurately identify auditory status. An approach is described, using the present data set, that allows one to assign to any measured DPOAE value (DPOAE amplitudes, DPOAE/noise) the probability that the response is coming either from the distribution of normal or impaired responses. In addition, DPOAE/noise systematically decreases as hearing loss increases over the range of hearing losses from 0 to about 40 to 60 dB HL (depending on frequency), thus potentially enabling one to differentiate hearing losses over this range. For hearing losses greater than 50 to 60 dB HL, ears do not produce measurable DPOAEs and thus, no predictive relationship exists.

Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

This study examined the effect of primary stimulus level on the ability of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements to separate normal-hearing from hearing-impaired ears. Complete I/O functions were obtained for nine f2 frequencies on 210 people approximately evenly divided between normal hearing and hearing impaired. Clinical decision theory was used to assess both DPOAE amplitudes and DPOAE threshold as diagnostic indicators of hearing status. Moderate level primary stimuli elicited responses that separated normal from impaired better than either lower level or higher level stimuli. The two populations were differentiated for all frequencies above 500 Hz by DPOAE amplitude, given primary levels, L1 and L2, of 65 and 55 dB SPL. DPOAE threshold performed equally well, but threshold ambiguity in noise and longer testing times make it a less suitable DPOAE measure to use diagnostically.

The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions were measured at nine f2 frequencies ranging from 500 to 8000 Hz in 210 normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. In a companion paper [Stover et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 956-967 (1996)], L1-L2 was held constant at 10 dB, and L2 was varied from 65 to 10 dB SPL in 5-dB steps. Based upon analyses using clinical decision theory, it was demonstrated that DPOAE amplitudes for 65/55 dB SPL primaries (L1/L2) and DPOAE thresholds resulted in the greatest separation between normal and impaired ears. In this paper, the data for these two conditions were recast as cumulative distributions, which not only describe the extent of overlap between normal and impaired distributions, but also provide the measured value (i.e., the specific DPOAE amplitude or threshold) for any combination of hit and false alarm rates. From these distributions, confidence limits were constructed for both DPOAE amplitude and threshold to determine the degree of certainty with which any measured response could be assigned to either the normal or impaired population. For these analyses, DPOAE measurements were divided into three categories (a) response properties that would be unlikely to come from normal ears, (b) response properties that would be unlikely to come from impaired ears, and (c) response properties for which hearing status was uncertain. Based upon DPOAE amplitude measurements, the region of uncertainty, defined between the 95 percentile for impaired ears and the 5 percentile for normal ears, was relatively narrow for f2 frequencies ranging from 707 to 4000 Hz. For DPOAE thresholds, this region was relatively narrow for F2 frequencies ranging from 1414 to 4000 Hz.

Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Click-evoked otoacoustic emission (COAE) and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) input/output (I/O) functions and group latencies were measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears to determine the extent to which these two types of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were similar. When stimulus levels measured in 1/3 octave bands centered at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were similar, TBOAE and COAE I/O functions were essentially identical in regions of normal hearing. This held true in subjects who had normal hearing from 250 to 8000 Hz as well as for subjects who had normal hearing across some frequency ranges but hearing impairment across others. The high degree of correlation offers support to the view that both types of transient emissions share common generators. There were no significant differences in group delay between TBOAEs measured from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

How children learn to organize their speech gestures: further evidence from fricative-vowel syllables.

Previous studies with fricative-vowel (FV) syllables have shown that the difference in overall spectrum between fricatives is less in children's speech than in that of adults, but that fricative noises show greater differences in the region of the second formant (F2) as a function of the upcoming vowel than those of adults at corresponding points in the fricative. These results have been interpreted as evidence that children produce fricatives that are not spatially differentiated as those of adults and that children initiate vowel gestures earlier during syllable production than adults do (Nittrouer, Studdert-Kennedy, & McGowan, 1989). The goals of the present study were (a) to replicate the previous age-related difference for F2 with FV syllables; (b) to test the alternative interpretation that age-related differences in fricative f2 reflect age-related differences in vocal-tract geometry; (c) to determine whether age-related differences in F2 (and so, by inference, in articulatory organization) might extend beyond the syllable boundaries, perhaps into the schwa of a preceding unstressed syllable; and (d) determine if gestures other than fricative gestures show less spatial differentiation in children's than in adults' speech. To these ends, F2 frequencies were measured in schwa-fricative-vowel utterances (consisting of the fricatives /s/ and [symbol:see text] and of the vowels /i/ and /a/) from 40 speakers (10 each of the ages of 3, 5, 7 years, and adults) at three locations (for the entire schwa, for 10 ms of fricative noise centered at 30 ms before voicing onset, and 10 pitch periods from vocalic center). Results of several analyses supported four conclusions: (a) the earlier finding was replicated; (b) age-related differences in vocal-tract geometry could not explain the age-related difference in vowel effects on fricative noise; (c) children master intersyllabic gestural organization prior to intrasyllabic gestural organization; and (d) unlike fricative gestures, children's vowel gestures are more spatially distinct than those of adults.

Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

A novel analysis approach has been developed to examine the latency of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). DPOAEs were measured in ten normal-hearing adults in a paradigm in which f2 was held constant and f1 was varied. This paradigm was used with a wide range of primary levels. Latency was estimated in two ways. In the first, a phase-slope delay measurement was used which showed a significant response latency increase as stimulus intensity was decreased. In the second approach, an inverse-FFT procedure was used to provide a temporal analysis of the data. Results of this analysis reveal a complex latency structure with multiple peaks in the envelope of the time waveform. The latencies of individual peaks remain constant across level, however, short latency peaks have the greatest amplitudes at higher levels, and longer latency peaks are largest at low levels. These results would be consistent with the idea that there are multiple intracochlear sources for distortion product generation; however, a simple model, in which generation is assigned to the f2 and the 2f1-f2 place, does not adequately explain the number of envelope peaks that were present in many ears.

Estimating residual noise in the auditory brain-stem response.

Estimation of the residual noise in the auditory brain-stem response waveform is considered. The residual noise measures one aspect of waveform quality. Moreover, it is an important component of signal detection algorithms used for automatic termination of the test. It is shown that the most commonly used method for estimating residual noise can be severely biased. Reasons for this bias are explored and two alternative estimators are presented.

Preliminary descriptions of transient-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from graduates of an intensive care nursery.

Transient-evoked (TEOAE) and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were measured in 51 graduates of an intensive care nursery and compared to data obtained from 80 normal-hearing children and adults. All infants had click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) at 30 dB nHL or less while the older subjects had pure-tone thresholds of 20 dB HL or less for octave frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz. OAE data were collected using commercially available devices. All data were analyzed in terms of emission amplitude, emission-to-noise ratio, and response reproducibility as a function of frequency. DPOAEs were measured at three points per octave between f2 frequencies of approximately 500 and 8000 Hz. TEOAEs were elicited by clicks and were analyzed in both octave and 1/3-octave bands centered at frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz, as well as in the broadband condition. In addition, stimulus amplitudes for the clicks used to elicit TEOAEs were analyzed within octave and 1/3-octave bands to determine whether any age-related differences in responses can be accounted for on the basis of stimulus differences. Both emission amplitude and noise amplitude were greater in neonates than adults, although there was variability across frequency. Emission-to-noise ratio and response reproducibility were more similar between groups. For TEOAEs, high-frequency emission-to-noise ratios were larger in neonates compared to older subjects, while the reverse was true in the lower frequencies. Less obvious frequency effects were observed for DPOAEs. These findings are discussed in relation to the potential use of OAEs as screening measures for neonatal hearing loss.