Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 36(3): 716-23, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18091548

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A minority of patients develop severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with high mortality following cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted cardiac surgery. We assessed whether intravenous immunoglobulin G (ivIgG) improves postoperative short-term (5-day) morbidity and reduces 28-day mortality in these patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Intensive care units of 11 cardiothoracic centers. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Of 6,984 patients screened, we identified 244 with severe SIRS (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score > or = 28 on the first postoperative day). INTERVENTIONS: The 244 patients with severe SIRS were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of either albumin 0.1% (placebo group, 6 mL [6 mg]/kg of body weight on day 1 and 3 mL [3 mg]/kg of body weight on day 2) or immunoglobulin G 10% (ivIgG group, 6 mL [600 mg]/kg of body weight on day 1 and 3 mL [300 mg]/kg of body weight on day 2). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prospectively defined primary end points were improvement in morbidity on day 5 and death from any cause assessed on day 28. A total of 218 patients received both doses of the study drug (placebo n = 108, ivIgG n = 110). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in the placebo group decreased from 31.8 +/- 4.0 (day 1) to 25.8 +/- 9.3 (day 5) and in the ivIgG group from 31.8 +/- 3.4 (day 1) to 25.9 +/- 10.3 (day 5), with no significant difference between the groups (p = .56). The 28-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (per protocol population, placebo group 31.5%, ivIgG group 39.1%; intent-to-treat population, placebo group 37.2%, ivIgG group: 44.7%). No effect of ivIgG on plasma levels of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, and tumor necrosis factor receptor I/II was observed. Drug-related adverse events were rare in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery (involving cardiopulmonary bypass) who develop severe SIRS derive no improvement in short-term morbidity or 28-day mortality from ivIgG.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , APACHE , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Crit Care Med ; 35(12): 2693-2701, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18074471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous immunoglobulin as an adjunctive treatment in sepsis was regarded as promising by a Cochrane meta-analysis of smaller trials. In this phase III multicenter trial, we assessed whether intravenous immunoglobulin G (ivIgG) reduced 28-day mortality and improved morbidity in patients with score-defined severe sepsis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Twenty-three medical and surgical intensive care units in university centers and large teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 653) with score-defined sepsis (sepsis score 12-27) and score-defined sepsis-induced severity of disease (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 20-35). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to receive either placebo or ivIgG (day 0, 0.6 g/kg body weight; day 1, 0.3 g/kg body weight). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prospectively defined primary end point was death from any cause after 28 days. Prospectively defined secondary end points were 7-day all-cause mortality, short-term change in morbidity, and pulmonary function at day 4. Six hundred fifty-three patients from 23 active centers formed the intention-to-treat group, 624 patients the per-protocol group (placebo group, n = 303; ivIgG group, n = 321). The 28-day mortality rate was 37.3% in the placebo group and 39.3% in the ivIgG group and thus not significantly different (p = .6695). Seven-day mortality was not reduced, and 4-day pulmonary function was not improved. Drug-related adverse events were rare in both groups. Exploratory findings revealed a 3-day shortening of mechanical ventilation in the surviving patients and no effect of ivIgG on plasma levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor receptors I and II. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with score-defined severe sepsis, ivIgG with a total dose of 0.9 g/kg body weight does not reduce mortality.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Sepsis/therapy , APACHE , Cytokines/blood , Cytokines/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sepsis/immunology , Shock, Septic/immunology , Shock, Septic/therapy , Survival Analysis
3.
Chemotherapy ; 49(6): 280-6, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14671427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute renal failure, the pharmacokinetics of meropenem depend on the operational characteristics of the renal replacement therapy. Dosage recommendations are based on the correlation of plasma levels with pharmacodynamic requirements. METHODS: Eight critically ill patients with acute renal failure were treated by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration with a filtrate flow of 1,600 ml/h and received 500 mg of meropenem every 12 h. Plasma and hemofiltrate concentrations of meropenem at steady state were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Peak levels in plasma amounted to 39.5 +/- 10.5 mg/l (mean +/- SD) and trough levels were 2.4 +/- 1.5 mg/l. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for susceptible bacteria (4 mg/l) was covered for 40% of the dosing interval or longer in all patients. The MIC for intermediately susceptible organisms (8 mg/l) was covered for 33% in 6 of the 8 patients. The elimination half-life was prolonged to 3.63 +/- 0.77 h. The sieving coefficient of meropenem was 0.91 +/- 0.10 and the recovery in hemofiltrate amounted to 30.9 +/- 11.5% of the dose. CONCLUSIONS: A dosage of 500 mg twice daily provides appropriate serum levels for the treatment of infections caused by susceptible bacteria. A higher dosage is adequate for infections by intermediately susceptible bacteria or for renal replacement therapies with markedly higher filtrate flow rates.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Hemofiltration , Thienamycins/pharmacology , Thienamycins/pharmacokinetics , Acute Kidney Injury/complications , Aged , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Critical Illness , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 166(8): 1029-37, 2002 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12379544

ABSTRACT

We prospectively studied the impact of an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen on the incidence of infections, organ dysfunctions, and mortality in a predominantly surgical and trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population. A total of 546 patients were enrolled and stratified according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II scores. They were then randomized to receive either 2 x 400 mg of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 4 days, together with a mixture of topical gentamicin and polymyxin applied to the nostrils, mouth, and stomach throughout their ICU stay or to receive intravenous and topical placebo. When receiving prophylaxis, significantly fewer patients acquired infections (p = 0.001, risk ratio [RR], 0.477; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.367-0.620), especially pneumonias (6 versus 29, p = 0.007), other lower respiratory tract infections (39 versus 70, p = 0.007), bloodstream infections (14 versus 36, p = 0.007), or urinary tract infections (36 versus 60, p = 0.042). Also, significantly fewer patients acquired severe organ dysfunctions (63 versus 96 patients, p = 0.0051; RR, 0.636; 95% CI, 0.463-0.874), especially renal dysfunctions (17 versus 38; p = 0.018). Within 5 days after admission, 24 patients died in each group, whereas 28 patients receiving prophylaxis and 51 receiving placebo died in the ICU thereafter (p = 0.0589; RR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.402-1.017). The overall ICU mortality was not statistically different (52 versus 75 fatalities), but the mortality was significantly reduced for 237 patients of the midrange stratum with APACHE-II scores of 20-29 on admission (20 versus 38 fatalities, p = 0.0147; RR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.295-0.875); there was still a favorable trend after 1 year (51 versus 60 fatalities; p = 0.0844; RR, 0.720; 95% CI, 0.496-1.046). Surveillance cultures from tracheobronchial, oropharyngeal, and gastric secretions and from rectal swabs did not show any evidence for the selection of resistant microorganisms in the patients receiving prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Critical Illness , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination/administration & dosage , Multiple Organ Failure/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , APACHE , Administration, Topical , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Critical Illness/mortality , Digestive System/microbiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Intensive Care Units , Polymyxins/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...