Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 91: 123-5, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15462010

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: retrospective study on the accuracy and reliability of two clinical tests for scoliosis in young patients. AIM: to evaluate the inter-observer reliability of three non-invasive clinical measurements: hump height (HH), axial trunk rotation (ATR), and distance of the spinous process from the plumb line (DP) in standing; to compare these results with the corresponding radiographic measurements, the Cobb angles (CA). POPULATION: 116 patients, 78 females and 38 males; 410 examinations have been performed (144 patients with brace and 266 without). METHODS: a database was created using the measurements of different clinical parameters obtained from two examiners that measured them independently and in the same conditions. The Cobb method has been used as a gold standard. RESULTS: our results show a very high inter-rater reliability for HH and ATR measurements. The DP shows a different inter-rater reliability for the thoracic (C7) and lumbar (L3) spine, in both cases lower than that in the frontal plane; the ICC of the thoracolumbar DP (D12) was very low. The correlation with the radiographic value was weak.


Subject(s)
Kyphosis/diagnosis , Lordosis/diagnosis , Scoliosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Braces , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/classification , Kyphosis/therapy , Lordosis/classification , Lordosis/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Male , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/classification , Scoliosis/therapy , Statistics as Topic , Thoracic Vertebrae
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...