Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 81
Filter
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(5): 942-949, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462681

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mapping system is useful in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and localization of anatomic variances. Voltage mapping identifies a low voltage area in the Koch triangle called low-voltage-bridge (LVB); propagation mapping identifies the collision point (CP) of atrial wavefront convergence. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the relationship between LVB and CP with successful site of ablation and identify standard value for LVB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the right atria were constructed from intracardiac recordings using the ablation catheter. Cut-off values on voltage map were adjusted until LVB was observed. On propagation map, atrial wavefronts during sinus rhythm collide in the site representing CP, indicating the area of slow pathway conduction. Ablation site was selected targeting LVB and CP site, confirmed by anatomic position on fluoroscopy and atrioventricular ratio. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. LVB and CP were present in all patients. Postprocedural evaluation identified standard cut-off of 0.3-1 mV useful for LVB identification. An overlap between LVB and CP was observed in 23 (85%) patients. Procedure success was achieved in all patient with effective site at first application in 22 (81%) patients. There was a significant correlation between LVB, CP, and the site of effective ablation (p = .001). CONCLUSION: We found correlation between LVB and CP with the site of effective ablation, identifying a voltage range useful for standardized LVB identification. These techniques could be useful to identify ablation site and minimize radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Catheter Ablation , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Heart Rate , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry , Humans , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/surgery , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/diagnosis , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Predictive Value of Tests , Aged , Atrioventricular Node/physiopathology , Atrioventricular Node/surgery , Time Factors
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36078699

ABSTRACT

The identification of patients who can benefit the most from the available preventive treatments is important in chronic migraine. We explored the rate of excellent responders to onabotulinumtoxinA in a multicenter European study and explored the predictors of such response, according to different definitions. A pooled analysis on chronic migraineurs treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and followed-up for, at least, 9 months was performed. Excellent responders were defined either as patients with a ≥75% decrease in monthly headache days (percent-based excellent responders) or as patients with <4 monthly headache days (frequency-based excellent responders). The characteristics of excellent responders at the baseline were compared with the ones of patients with a <30% decrease in monthly headache days. Percent-based excellent responders represented about 10% of the sample, whilst frequency-based excellent responders were about 5% of the sample. Compared with non-responders, percent-based excellent responders had a higher prevalence of medication overuse and a higher excellent response rate even after the 1st and the 2nd injection. Females were less like to be frequency-based excellent responders. Chronic migraine sufferers without medication overuse and of female sex may find fewer benefits with onabotulinumtoxinA. Additionally, the excellent response status is identifiable after the first cycle.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Migraine Disorders , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Female , Headache , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pain Med ; 23(2): 396-402, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness and safety of three oral cannabinoid preparations (FM2®, Istituto farmaceutico militare, Firenze, Italy; Bedrocan®, Bedrocan International, Vandaam, Netherlands; and Bediol®, Bedrocan International, Vandaam, Netherlands) in the treatment of chronic migraine. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic migraine who received FM2, Bedrocan, or Bediol daily for the off-label treatment of their headache, for up to 6 months. METHODS: The number of migraine days per month, pain intensity, the number of acute medications taken per month, the number of days per month on which the patient took at least one acute medication, and adverse events were recorded at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months after the start of treatment with oral cannabinoid preparations. RESULTS: The number of migraine days did not change significantly after the third month or the sixth month when compared with baseline (P = 0.1182). The pain intensity (P = 0.0004), the acute medication consumption (P = 0.0006), and the number of days per month in which patients took at least one acute medication significantly decreased when compared with baseline (P = 0.0004). No significant differences were found between patients who were still taking a preventive treatment for chronic migraine and those who were not (all P > 0.05). Different oral cannabinoid preparations displayed similar levels of effectiveness (all P > 0.05). The adverse events were mostly mild and occurred in 43.75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral cannabinoid preparations may have a role in reducing pain intensity and acute medication intake in patients with chronic migraine, but the magnitude of the effect seems modest; further studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoids , Migraine Disorders , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Headache , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Transl Med ; 19(1): 491, 2021 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonthyroidal Illness Syndrome (NTIS) can be detected in many critical illnesses. Recently, we demonstrated that this condition is frequently observed in COVID-19 patients too and it is correlated with the severity the disease. However, the exact mechanism through which thyroid hormones influence the course of COVID-19, as well as that of many other critical illnesses, is not clear yet and treatment with T4, T3 or a combination of both is still controversial. Aim of this study was to analyze body composition in COVID-19 patients in search of possible correlation with the thyroid function. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We report here our experience performed in 74 critically ill COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our University Hospital in Rome. In these patients, we evaluated the thyroid hormone function and body composition by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) during the acute phase of the disease at admission in the ICU. To examine the effects of thyroid function on BIA parameters we analyzed also 96 outpatients, affected by thyroid diseases in different functional conditions. We demonstrated that COVID-19 patients with low FT3 serum values exhibited increased values of the Total Body Water/Free Fat Mass (TBW/FFM) ratio. Patients with the lowest FT3 serum values had also the highest level of TBW/FFM ratio. This ratio is an indicator of the fraction of FFM as water and represents one of the best-known body-composition constants in mammals. We found an inverse correlation between FT3 serum values and this constant. Reduced FT3 serum values in COVID-19 patients were correlated with the increase in the total body water (TBW), the extracellular water (ECW) and the sodium/potassium exchangeable ratio (Nae:Ke), and with the reduction of the intracellular water (ICW). No specific correlation was observed in thyroid patients at different functional conditions between any BIA parameters and FT3 serum values, except for the patient with myxedema, that showed a picture similar to that seen in COVID-19 patients with NTIS. Since the Na+/K+ pump is a well-known T3 target, we measured the mRNA expression levels of the two genes coding for the two major isoforms of this pump. We demonstrated that COVID-19 patients with NTIS had lower levels of mRNA of both genes in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)s obtained from our patients during the acute phase of the disease. In addition, we retrieved data from transcriptome analysis, performed on human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM)s treated with T3 and we demonstrated that in these cells T3 is able to stimulate the expression of these two genes in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we demonstrated that measurement of BIA parameters is a useful method to analyze water and salt retention in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in ICU and, in particular, in those that develop NTIS. Our results indicate that NTIS has peculiar similarities with myxedema seen in severe hypothyroid patients, albeit it occurs more rapidly. The Na+/K+ pump is a possible target of T3 action, involved in the pathogenesis of the anasarcatic condition observed in our COVID-19 patients with NTIS. Finally, measurement of BIA parameters may represent good endpoints to evaluate the benefit of future clinical interventional trials, based on the administration of T3 in patients with NTIS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Animals , Gene Expression , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Sodium , Triiodothyronine
5.
Cell Death Dis ; 12(11): 1019, 2021 10 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34716309

ABSTRACT

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients are worsened by the presence of co-morbidities, especially cancer leading to elevated mortality rates. SARS-CoV-2 infection is known to alter immune system homeostasis. Whether cancer patients developing COVID-19 present alterations of immune functions which might contribute to worse outcomes have so far been poorly investigated. We conducted a multi-omic analysis of immunological parameters in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of COVID-19 patients with and without cancer. Healthy donors and SARS-CoV-2-negative cancer patients were also included as controls. At the infection peak, cytokine multiplex analysis of blood samples, cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) cell population analyses, and Nanostring gene expression using Pancancer array on PBMCs were performed. We found that eight pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, IL-1ra, MIP-1a, IP-10) out of 27 analyzed serum cytokines were modulated in COVID-19 patients irrespective of cancer status. Diverse subpopulations of T lymphocytes such as CD8+T, CD4+T central memory, Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT), natural killer (NK), and γδ T cells were reduced, while B plasmablasts were expanded in COVID-19 cancer patients. Our findings illustrate a repertoire of aberrant alterations of gene expression in circulating immune cells of COVID-19 cancer patients. A 19-gene expression signature of PBMCs is able to discriminate COVID-19 patients with and without solid cancers. Gene set enrichment analysis highlights an increased gene expression linked to Interferon α, γ, α/ß response and signaling which paired with aberrant cell cycle regulation in cancer patients. Ten out of the 19 genes, validated in a real-world consecutive cohort, were specific of COVID-19 cancer patients independently from different cancer types and stages of the diseases, and useful to stratify patients in a COVID-19 disease severity-manner. We also unveil a transcriptional network involving gene regulators of both inflammation response and proliferation in PBMCs of COVID-19 cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Cytokines/blood , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , COVID-19/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/cytology , Male , Neoplasms/pathology
6.
Pain Ther ; 10(2): 1605-1618, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34564833

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is mostly a female disorder because of its lower prevalence in men. Less than 20% of patients included in the available studies on migraine treatments are men; hence, the evidence on migraine treatments might not apply to men. The aims of the present study were to provide reliable information on the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) for chronic migraine in men and to compare clinical benefits between men and women. METHODS: We performed a pooled patient-level gender-specific analysis of real-life data on BT-A for chronic migraine of patients followed-up to 9 months. We reported the 50% responder rates during each BT-A cycle, defined as percentage of reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to baseline, along with 75% and 30% responder rates. We also reported the mean decrease in MHDs and in days of acute medication use (DAMs) during each BT-A cycle as compared to baseline. We also evaluated the reasons for stopping the treatment within the third cycle. RESULTS: We included an overall cohort of 2879 patients, 522 of whom (18.1%) were men. In men, 50% responder rates were 27.7% during the first BT-A cycle, 29.2% during the second, and 35.6% during the third cycle; in women, the corresponding rates were 26.6%, 33.5%, and 41.0%. In the overall cohort, responder rates did not differ between men and women during the first two cycles; during the third cycle, the distribution was different (P < 0.001) mostly because of higher rates of treatment stopping and non-responders in men. In the propensity score matched cohort, the trend was maintained but lost its statistical significance. Both men and women had a significant decrease in MHDs and in DAMs with BT-A treatment (P < 0.001). There were no gender differences in those changes with the only exception of MHD decrease which, during the third cycle, was lower in men than in women (7.4 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.016 in the overall cohort and 9.1 vs 12.5 days, P = 0.009 in the propensity score matched cohort). At the end of follow-up, 152 men and 485 women stopped BT-A treatment (29.1% vs 20.6%; P < 0.001). The relative proportion of patients stopping treatment because of inadequate response (less than 30% decrease in MHDs from baseline) was higher in men than in women (42.8% vs 39.6%), while the proportion of patients stopping because of adverse events was higher in women than in men (5.6% vs 0%; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled analysis suggests that the response to BT-A is significant in both men and women with a small gender difference in favor of women. Men tended to stop the treatment more frequently than women. We emphasize the need for more gender-specific data on migraine treatments from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

7.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(11): 832-839, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482324

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial involvement are common in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). We investigated relationships between CVD, cardiac biomarkers and outcome in COVID-19. METHODS: We analyzed n = 252 patients from a multicenter study and provided comparison according to the presence or absence of underlying CVD. Cardiac biomarkers high-sensitivity Troponin [upper reference of normality (URN) 35 pg/ml for Troponin I and 14 pg/ml for Troponin T] and natriuretic peptides (Nt-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, URN 300 pg/ml and B-type natriuretic peptide, URN 100 pg/ml) were both available in n = 136. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 ±â€Š16 years (56% men, 31% with previous CVD). Raised hs-Troponin and natriuretic peptides were detected in 36 and 50% of the cases respectively. Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemoglobin, hs-Troponin and natriuretic peptides were independently associated with underlying CVD (P < 0.05 for all). Compared with the normal biomarkers subgroups, patients with isolated hs-Troponin elevation had higher in-hospital mortality (31 vs. 4%, P < 0.05), similar CVD prevalence (15 vs. 11%) and trend towards higher D-dimer (930 vs. 397 ng/ml, P = 0.140). Patients with both biomarkers elevated had higher age, D-dimer, CVD and in-hospital mortality prevalence compared with other subgroups (all P < 0.05 for trend). Outcome analysis revealed previous CVD [model 1: OR 2.72 (95% CI 1.14-6.49), P = 0.024. model 2: OR 2.65 (95% CI 1.05-6.71), P = 0.039], hs-Troponin (log10) [OR 2.61 (95% CI 1.21-5.66), P = 0.015] and natriuretic peptides (log10) [OR 5.84 (95%CI 2.43-14), P < 0.001] to be independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In our population, previous CVD was part of a vulnerable phenotype including older age, comorbidities, increased cardiac biomarkers and worse prognosis. Patients with isolated increase in hs-Troponin suffered higher mortality rates despite low prevalence of CVD, possibly explained by higher COVID-19-related systemic involvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Natriuretic Peptides/blood , Troponin/blood , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/classification , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
8.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 21(8): 999-1011, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009094

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is one of the most common illnesses in the world, with severe economical and subjective implications. Nowadays specific and nonspecific drugs are used for migraine chronic therapy, but a portion of patients have no benefit from these administrations. CGRP receptor antagonists are a good preventive treatment for episodic and chronic migraine. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews both preclinical and clinical studies on eptinezumab as a potential preventive therapy for migraine, as well as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features. Thus, it summarizes safety and tolerability data based on human studies. EXPERT OPINION: Eptinezumab had good results in several trials, making this molecule a promising migraine preventive drug. Although preclinical and clinical studies showed a significant efficacy, there are no data on the use of Eptinezumab during pregnancy or breastfeeding. There are still some knowledge limits about its pharmacokinetics and metabolism. This is a matter of concern that should be addressed in future studies.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Migraine Disorders , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control
9.
Pain Ther ; 10(1): 637-650, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33778933

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) quarterly was the first treatment approved specifically for chronic migraine (CM). It is unclear whether three cycles are better than two to assess early BT-A response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on real-life prospectively collected data in 16 European headache centers. All the centers provided data on patients treated with BT-A for CM over the first three cycles of treatment. For each treatment cycle we defined patients as "good responders" if reporting a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days compared with the three months before starting BT-A, "partial responders" if reporting a 30-49% reduction in monthly headache days, and "non-responders" if reporting a < 30% reduction in monthly headache days or stopping the treatment before the third cycle. RESULTS: We included 2879 patients. Seven hundred and eighty-four (64.6%) of the 1213 patients reporting a good response during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; 309 (49.3%) of the 627 patients reporting a partial response (but no good response) during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; only 65 (6.3%) of the 1039 patients who did not respond during both the first two cycles achieved a good response during the third cycle. Multivariate analyses showed that partial or good response during the first or the second cycle were independently associated with good response during the third cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with CM responding to BT-A during the first two cycles will likely benefit from the third cycle of treatment, while the probability that non-responders to the first two cycles start responding during the third cycle is low. These results can help guide the individual decision to stop or continue treatment after the second cycle in patients who have not responded to the first two cycles.

10.
BMC Fam Pract ; 22(1): 54, 2021 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine affects 80.8 million people in Western Europe and is the first cause of disability among people between ages 15 and 49 worldwide. Despite being a highly prevalent and disabling condition, migraine remains under-diagnosed and poorly managed. METHODS: An international, online survey was conducted among 201 general practitioners (GPs) from 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) who are experienced in the management of headache disorders. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (82%) did not refer patients with chronic migraine (CM) to migraine specialists. Among those patients, the participants estimated that around 55% received preventive medication. Some differences between countries were observed regarding referral rate and prescription of preventive treatment. Most GPs (87%) reported a lack of training or the need to be updated on CM management. Accordingly, 95% of GPs considered that a migraine anamnesis guide could be of use. Overall, more than 95% of GPs favoured the use of a patient diary, a validated diagnostic tool and a validated scale to assess impact of migraine on patients' daily life. Similarly, 96% of the GPs considered that the inclusion of warning features (red flags) in an anamnesis guide would be useful and 90% favoured inclusion of referral recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this survey indicate that more education on diagnosis and management of CM is needed in primary care. Better knowledge on the recognition and management of migraine in primary care would improve both prognosis and diagnosis and reduce impact of migraine on patients' lives, healthcare utilization and societal burden.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Migraine Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , France , Humans , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
11.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 1, 2021 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33390161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent and disabling headache disorder that affects more than 1.04 billion individuals world-wide. It can result in reduction in quality of life, increased disability, and high socio-economic burden. Nevertheless, and despite the availability of evidence-based national and international guidelines, the management of migraine patients often remains suboptimal, especially for chronic migraine (CM) patients. METHODS: My-LIFE anamnesis project surveyed 201 General practitioners (GPs) from 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) with the aim of understanding chronic migraine (CM) patients' management in the primary care setting. RESULTS: In our survey, GPs diagnosed episodic migraine (EM) more often than CM (87% vs 61%, p < 0.001). We found that many CM patients were not properly managed or referred to specialists, in contrast to guidelines recommendations. The main tools used by primary-care physicians included clinical interview, anamnesis guide, and patient diary. Tools used at the first visit differed from those used at follow-up visits. Up to 82% of GPs reported being responsible for management of patients diagnosed with disabling or CM and did not refer them to a specialist. Even when the GP had reported referring CM patients to a specialist, 97% of them were responsible for their follow-up. Moreover, the treatment prescribed, both acute and preventive, was not in accordance with local and international recommendations. GPs reported that they evaluated the efficacy of the treatment prescribed mainly through patient perception, and the frequency of follow-up visits was not clearly established in the primary care setting. These results suggest that CM is underdiagnosed and undertreated; thereby its management is suboptimal in the primary care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of guidance in the primary care setting to both leverage the management of CM patients and earlier referral to specialists, when appropriate.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Adult , Europe , Female , Humans , Male
12.
Neurol Sci ; 42(5): 1895-1921, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968869

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate headache treatment before and during pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Most headaches in pregnancy are primary disorders. Headaches are likely to ameliorate during pregnancy, although they may also begin or worsen. Most headache medications should be avoided during pregnancy because of potential fetal risks. However, only scarce evidence on headache drug consumption during pregnancy is available. DESIGN: ATENA was a retrospective, self-administered questionnaire-based, cohort study on women in either pregnancy or who have just delivered and reporting headache before and/or during pregnancy. RESULTS: Out of 271 women in either pregnancy or who have just delivered, 100 (37%) reported headache before and/or during pregnancy and constituted our study sample. Before pregnancy, the attitude toward the use of symptomatic drugs was characterized by both a strong focus on their safety and the willingness to avoid possible dependence from them. Compared to the year before, pregnancy led to changes in behavior and therapeutic habits as shown by a higher proportion of patients looking for information about drugs (44/100 [44%] vs. 36/100 [36%]) and a lower proportion of those treating headache attacks (88/100 [88%] vs. 52/100 [52%]) and by a lower use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (68/100 [68%] vs. 5/100 [5%]) and a much higher use of paracetamol (33/100 [33%] vs. 95/100 [95%]). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy changes how women self-treat their headache, and leads to search for information regarding drug safety, mostly due to the perception of fetal risk of drugs. Healthcare providers have to be ready to face particular needs of pregnant women with headache.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Pregnancy Complications , Cohort Studies , Female , Headache/drug therapy , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
13.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 21(3): 277-285, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297780

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Headache is the fifth most common reason to visit an emergency department (ED). In most of the cases, headache is benign and has a primary origin, with migraine as the most common diagnosis. Inappropriate use of ED for non-emergency conditions causes overcrowding, unnecessary testing, and increased medical costs.Areas covered: All stages of headache management in ED, from the reasons to go there, the diagnosis that is made and the investigations necessary to make it, to get to the therapies administered and those prescribed at discharge, if there were any. Finally, the authors evaluated the habit of recommending medical follow-up and how often the headache is still present at discharge or returns within 24 hours.Expert Opinion: Primary headaches are underdiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and the majority do not receive drug therapy either in ED or on discharge, and in cases where the therapy is prescribed is not specific. Increase the number of primary care medical services, spread the 'headaches culture' among GPs and ED doctors, the adoption of ICHD in the diagnostic protocols used in EDs and a fast referral to a headache center could decrease the inappropriate use of ED and improve the headache management in the emergency units.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Physicians , Emergency Service, Hospital , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/therapy , Humans
14.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(7): 907-922, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369482

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders. Nowadays, the 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, namely triptans, are considered as the standard of care for migraine acute treatment. However, triptans have limitations in some patients, such as incomplete pain relief, headache recurrence, and cardiovascular contraindications. New 5-HT1F receptor agonists, namely ditans, and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, namely gepants, have been developed as migraine-specific treatments.Areas covered: This paper reviews the available data from RCTs to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine and atogepant for the prevention of migraine.Expert opinion: Available data suggest that lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant might not have a clinical efficacy similar to triptans. Lasmiditan did not cause the typical triptan side effects but was associated with central nervous system side effects, causing temporary driving impairment. On the contrary, the new generation of gepants showed a placebo-like tolerability profile and the absence of a specific pattern of side effects. Future studies on lasmiditan and gepants with respect to established effective comparators are mandatory to support phase III results and to help clinicians to balance the benefit/risk profiles of the various acute and preventive medications.


Subject(s)
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists , Migraine Disorders , Analgesics , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists , Tryptamines/therapeutic use
15.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 20(12): 1275-1286, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990477

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are two of the few treatments that ameliorate chronic migraine (CM) in randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Separate clinical practice guidelines have been developed for the management of CM with OBT-A or CGRP-targeting mAbs. AREAS COVERED: Considering the concomitant availability of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs as therapeutic treatment options, Italian migraine experts reviewed the evidence supporting the efficacy of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs in CM in order to rationalize the management of CM patients treated with OBT-A. Experts addressed everyday practice needs to shape the optimal pharmacological management by balancing adherence to regulatory indications, ethical considerations, and clinical expertise. Considering the remarkable challenge of improving the health and quality of life of patients with CM, even partial improvements may be clinically meaningful, particularly for those who are resistant or intolerant to oral migraine treatments. EXPERT OPINION: In this collaborative effort, we propose a treatment algorithm that integrates the relevant aspects of managing patients with CM to provide ready-to-use practical guidance regarding the appropriate use of OBT-A.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Italy
16.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 86, 2020 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common headache disorder, with cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) considered as the underlying electrophysiological event. CSD is a slowly propagating wave of neuronal and glial depolarization. Sleep disorders are well known risk factors for migraine chronification, and changes in wake-sleep pattern such as sleep deprivation are common migraine triggers. The underlying mechanisms are unknown. As a step towards developing an animal model to study this, we test whether sleep deprivation, a modifiable migraine trigger, enhances CSD susceptibility in rodent models. METHODS: Acute sleep deprivation was achieved using the "gentle handling method", chosen to minimize stress and avoid confounding bias. Sleep deprivation was started with onset of light (diurnal lighting conditions), and assessment of CSD was performed at the end of a 6 h or 12 h sleep deprivation period. The effect of chronic sleep deprivation on CSD was assessed 6 weeks or 12 weeks after lesioning of the hypothalamic ventrolateral preoptic nucleus. All experiments were done in a blinded fashion with respect to sleep status. During 60 min of continuous topical KCl application, we assessed the total number of CSDs, the direct current shift amplitude and duration of the first CSD, the average and cumulative duration of all CSDs, propagation speed, and electrical CSD threshold. RESULTS: Acute sleep deprivation of 6 h (n = 17) or 12 h (n = 11) duration significantly increased CSD frequency compared to controls (17 ± 4 and 18 ± 2, respectively, vs. 14 ± 2 CSDs/hour in controls; p = 0.003 for both), whereas other electrophysiological properties of CSD were unchanged. Acute total sleep deprivation over 12 h but not over 6 h reduced the electrical threshold of CSD compared to controls (p = 0.037 and p = 0.095, respectively). Chronic partial sleep deprivation in contrast did not affect CSD susceptibility in rats. CONCLUSIONS: Acute but not chronic sleep deprivation enhances CSD susceptibility in rodents, possibly underlying its negative impact as a migraine trigger and exacerbating factor. Our findings underscore the importance of CSD as a therapeutic target in migraine and suggest that headache management should identify and treat associated sleep disorders.


Subject(s)
Migraine without Aura/physiopathology , Sleep Deprivation/physiopathology , Animals , Cortical Spreading Depression/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
17.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 44, 2020 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32366217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cluster headache (CH) is the most frequent trigemino-autonomic cephalgia. CH can manifest as episodic (ECH) or chronic cluster headache (CCH) causing significant burden of disease and requiring attack therapy and prophylactic treatment. The few data available on the economic burden of CH come from retrospective studies based on questionnaires, population surveys and medical insurance claims database. Although all these studies showed an important economic burden, they provided different estimates depending on variability of CH awareness and management, healthcare systems, available therapies and use of treatments according to different guidelines. METHODS: This prospective study aimed to quantify the total direct and indirect cost of ECH and CCH over a cluster period, both for the patient and for the National Health System (NHS), using data from subjects who consecutively attended an Italian tertiary headache centre between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. RESULTS: A total 108 patients (89 ECH, 19 CCH) were included. Mean attack frequency was 2.3 ± 1.4 per day. Mean total cost of a CH bout was €4398 per patient and total cost of CCH was 5.4 times higher than ECH (€13,350 vs. €2487, p <  0.001). Direct costs represented the 72.1% of total cost and were covered for the 94.8% by the NHS. The costs for any item of expense were higher for CCH than for ECH (p <  0.001). Mean indirect costs for a CH bout were €1226 per patient and were higher for CCH compared to ECH (€3.538 vs. €732), but the difference was not significant. Days with reduced productive capacity impacted for the 64.6% of the total indirect costs. The analysis of the impact CH on work showed that 27%% of patients felt that CH had limited their career, 40% had changed their work pattern, 20% had changed their place of employment and 10% had lost a job due to the disease. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a valuable estimate of the direct and indirect costs of ECH and CCH in the specific setting of a tertiary headache centre and confirm the high economic impact of CH on both the NHS and patients.


Subject(s)
Cluster Headache/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , National Health Programs/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Adult , Cluster Headache/epidemiology , Cluster Headache/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Health Care Costs/trends , Health Expenditures/trends , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/trends , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Care Centers/trends , Young Adult
18.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 25, 2020 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32169031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Headache is one of the most common reason for medical consultation to emergency department (ED). The inappropriate use of ED for non-emergency conditions is a problem in terms of overcrowding of emergency facilities, unnecessary testing and treatment, increased medical costs, burden on medical service providers and weaker relationships between patient and primary care provider. The aim of this study was to analyze the different stages of ED management of headache to identify those deficiencies that can be overcome by a fast referral to a headache clinic. METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of patients discharged from an academic ED between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and referred to the tertiary level headache centre of the same hospital. We analyzed all aspects related to the permanence in ED and also assessed whether there was a match between the diagnosis made in ED and ours. RESULTS: Among our sample of 244 patients, 76.2% were admitted as "green tag", 75% underwent a head computed tomography, 19.3% received a neurological consultation, 43% did not receive any pharmacological treatment and 62.7% still had headache at discharge. The length of stay in ED was associated with reporting the first aura ever (p = 0.014) and whether patients received consultations (p < 0.001). The concordance analysis shown a significant moderate agreement only for the diagnosis of migraine and only between triage and headache centre. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who went to ED complaining of headache received the same treatment regardless of their diagnosis and in many cases the headache had not yet resolved at the time of discharge. Given the many shortcomings in headache management in ED, rapid referral to the headache centre is of paramount importance to help the patient achieve a definiteve diagnosis and appropriate treatment.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Headache/diagnosis , Referral and Consultation/standards , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
19.
Neurol Sci ; 41(3): 583-589, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31720898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nummular headache (NH) is a rare headache disorder characterized by a small, circumscribed painful area of the scalp. The description of many cases in the last years has supported its re-classification as a primary headache from the International Headache Society, moving it from its previous placement in the Appendix of the International Criteria of Headache Disorders. METHODS: Data were collected from a retro-prospective observational study about rare headaches promoted by the RegistRare Network, a collaborative group of seven Italian Headache Centres. According to the gender-biased profile of certain primary headaches, we have looked further NH patients from a gender perspective. RESULTS: Nineteen NH patients (11 men, 8 women) have been enrolled in the study. Headache onset was at 39 years and preceded approximately 8 years the diagnosis. No clinically evident differences between men and women have been found, including treatment prescriptions and headache resolution. Of note, the mean time from the onset of NH to the first visit in a Headache Centre was longer in men, compared with women (13.5 vs. 0.9 years). NH attacks were efficaciously treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 60% of patients receiving treatment. Headache prophylaxis with pregabalin and amitriptyline has been reported as effective in 40% and 67% of the treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NH is a primary headache clinically heterogeneous in terms of temporal patterns and pain characteristics. Further research is needed to investigate the existence of male and female phenotypes, by clarifying whether it may be relevant for therapeutic purposes.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Headache Disorders, Primary/drug therapy , Headache Disorders, Primary/epidemiology , Headache Disorders, Primary/physiopathology , Registries , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Female , Headache Disorders, Primary/prevention & control , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Rare Diseases , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510071

ABSTRACT

Migraine headache is the cause of an estimated 250,000,000 lost days from work or school every year and is often associated with decreased work productivity. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the relationship between perceived disability, job satisfaction and work productivity in patients affected by chronic migraineurs. Participants were 98 consecutive adult outpatients admitted to the Regional Referral Headache Centre of the Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome, Italy. Patients were administered the Italian Perceived Disability Scale, The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Work Subscale and The Endicott Work Productivity Scale. Perceived disability is significantly associated with job satisfaction and work productivity. Job satisfaction is significantly related to work productivity and mediates the association between perceived disability and work productivity in patients affected by chronic migraineurs. Our results confirm that patients suffering from migraine headaches who have negative perceptions of their disability are less satisfied with their job, which in turn, decreases their work productivity.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/psychology , Efficiency , Job Satisfaction , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personal Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Rome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...