Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing radiofrequency (RF) electrical disconnection of multiple pulmonary veins (PVs), the incidence of late conduction recurrences has not been systematically determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a prospectively designed, multistep approach, we aimed at assessing the correlation between acute achievement and chronic maintenance of electrical conduction block across RF lesions disconnecting the distal tract of the PV in 43 patients (52.3+/-8.2 years) with AF. Forty-one left superior (LS), 42 right superior (RS), 25 left inferior (LI), and 9 right inferior (RI) PVs were targeted during 108 EP procedures (2.6+/-0.5 per patient). Seventeen patients underwent 2 procedures, 23 patients underwent 3 procedures, and 3 patients underwent 4 procedures. During the first attempt, electrical disconnection was achieved in 112 PVs (95.7%). During a next procedure (time interval, 4.6+/-1.9 months), conduction recurrence was observed in 32 of 39 LSPVs (82.1%), 29 of 40 RSPVs (72.5%), 20 of 24 LIPVs (83.3%), and 7 of 9 RIPV (77.8%). After reablation at gap sites, a later procedure (time interval, 5.1+/-2.4 months) revealed a second recurrence in 13 of 22 LSPVs (59.1%) and 14 of 19 RSPVs (73.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Conduction recurrence across disconnecting RF lesions can be observed in approximately 80% of cases 4 months after ablation. After reablation, similar recurrence rates are observed 5 months later. This high rate of late conduction recurrence may contribute significantly to AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation aiming at disconnection of multiple PVs.

Role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) accounts for about 10,000 deaths per year in western countries. Of these deaths, 8% to 51% occur suddenly, with more than half of the events due to a ventricular arrhythmia. Improvement in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies, together with changes in secular trends, have likely contributed to the reported trend toward improved survival in recent years. Identification of DCM patients at higher risk of sudden death is difficult. Poor left ventricular function is the strongest predictor of all-cause death, whereas a history of sustained unstable ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest identifies patients at high risk of sudden death. Recent data suggest that a history of syncope, regardless of inducibility at programmed electrical stimulation, may be a risk factor of sudden death. Despite the absence of controlled studies, use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for primary prevention can be considered in patients with unexplained syncope as well as subgroups of DCM patients awaiting transplantation. In patients who survive a cardiac arrest or an unstable ventricular tachycardia, use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy is associated with improved survival during follow-up and should be considered as a first-line therapy.