ABSTRACT
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the most prevalent cardiovascular emergencies in the world. The development of international protocols and the use of accessible devices such as automated external defibrillators (AEDs) allowed for the standardization and organization of medical care related to SCA. When defibrillation is performed within five minutes of starting ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), the victim survival rate has increased considerably. Therefore, training healthcare professionals to use AEDs correctly is essential to improve patient outcomes and response time in the intervention. In this technical report, we advocate simulation-based education as a teaching methodology and an essential component of drone adaptation, novel technology, that can deliver AEDs to the site, as well as a training scenario to teach healthcare professionals how to operate the real-time communication components of drones and AEDs efficiently. Studies have suggested that simulation can be an effective way to train healthcare professionals. Through teaching methodology using simulation, training these audiences has the potential to reduce the response time to intervention, consequently, increasing the patient's chance of surviving.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether a group programme for community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors and their carers is feasible in rural settings; to measure the impact of the programme on health-related quality of life and functional performance; and to determine if any benefits gained are maintained. DESIGN: Randomized, assessor blind, cross-over, controlled trial. SETTING: Rural outpatient. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five community-dwelling, chronic stroke survivors and 17 carers of participant stroke survivors. INTERVENTION: The intervention group undertook a once-a-week, seven-week group programme combining physical activity, education, self-management principles and a 'healthy options' morning tea. At completion, the control group crossed over to receive the intervention. MAIN MEASURES: Stroke Impact Scale (stroke survivors), Health Impact Scale (carers), Six Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go, Caregiver Strain Index. RESULTS: There were insufficient participants for results to reach statistical significance. However between-group trends favoured the intervention group in the majority of outcome measures for stroke survivors and carers. The majority of measures remained above baseline at 12 weeks post programme for stroke survivor participants. The programme was well attended. Of the seven sessions all participants attended four or more and 88% attended six or seven sessions. CONCLUSIONS: This novel programme incorporating physical activity, education and social interaction proved feasible to undertake by a stroke-specific multidisciplinary team in three rural Australian settings. This programme may improve and maintain health-related quality of life and physical functioning for chronic stroke survivors and their carers and warrants further investigation.
