How is Integration Defined and Measured, and what Factors Drive Success in Brazil? An Integrative Review.

Introduction: Integration in health and care can improve quality and outcomes, but it is challenged by expansion of medical knowledge, social pressures on patient needs, and demands to deliver critical information. In Latin American and in other lower and middle-income countries integrated care remains in development. This paper examined the available literature on integrated care to understand how Latin American countries identify and measure integration, and what factors influence success. Methods: This integrative literature review included systematic searches in Global Health, PubMed, SciELO and BVSPsi databases for articles on integrated care in Spanish, Portuguese, and English in the period from January of 1999 to December 2020. The articles were screened for selection and assessed independently by five reviewers that used the inclusion criteria of papers about integration in health care systems. The sample excluded articles that did not deal with the integration of health care, which addressed issues related to public health campaigns, programs to control endemics and epidemics, reports on the experience of implementing health services, health promotion guidelines, food safety, oral health, and books evaluation. Results: 24 articles were included: qualitative (75%), quantitative (12,5%), and mixed-method research (4%) published between 2000 and 2017. All studies were undertaken in Brazil, and two of them were also conducted in Latin American countries. In 15 articles there was an interchangeable use between concepts of integration of services and integrated care, while nine studies did not define integration. Barriers to integration included absence of shared understanding of knowledge among members of interprofessional teams, lack of clarity on professional roles, missing consensus on a definition and measurement of integrated care, power struggles between professionals, poor institutional support, insufficient team preparation and training and unequal valuation of professions by society. Conclusion: Several types of integration and factors contributing to the success of implementation of integrated care in various contexts in Brazil were identified. The concept of integration reflected the varied local and regional realities including different health settings and levels of health and care, suggesting a need for further clarifications on its objective and components especially in LMIC contexts.

Breastfeeding success and its relation to maternal pain, behaviour, mental health, and social support.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand the maternal experience of breastfeeding onset and how psychological, social and clinical variables as pain during breastfeeding, may interfere with it. METHODS: A cross-sectional study investigated 395 post-delivery women able to breastfeed from 48 hours to 6 days for unpleasant breastfeeding, maternal stress during pregnancy and postnatal mental state. Social Readjustment Rating Scale evaluated prenatal maternal stress. Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Parent version, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale evaluated maternal mental state. RESULTS: Unpleasant breastfeeding experience showed to be positively related to the longer number of days the pain lasts; late onset of breastfeeding; less search for information about pregnancy and baby care (p < .01); lower catastrophizing behaviour towards infant´s stress and C-section delivery (p < .04). Pain levels were positively correlated to longer periods of pain, later onset of antenatal consultations and depression (p < .05). Binary logistic regression pointed to the effects of lower self-efficacy and pain in breastfeeding, higher depression levels, gestational stress, labour adversities and success in breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship among maternal perceived self-efficacy, anxious and depressive thoughts, catastrophizing behaviours, and unpleasant breastfeeding need to be evaluated to elucidate the best health professional intervention.

Adaptation and validation of the EVENDOL scale to assess pain in neonates in Portuguese language.

BACKGROUND: EVENDOL scale (from the French Evaluation Enfant Douleur) is used to evaluate pain in children in any situation covering a wider age group than other pain scales (birth up to seven years). This study aimed to evaluate pain in hospitalized newborns, to adapt and validate the EVENDOL to Brazilian Portuguese. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, cross-cultural adaptation and validation study in a convenience sample from a tertiary hospital, Brazil. EVENDOL was translated and tested for reliability and validity using the PIPP and NFCS scales for comparison. For reliability testing, two observers independently evaluated 117 nociceptive procedures from 87 newborns. Internal consistency coefficient Cronbach's alpha, internal class agreement coefficient, and Kappa factor were appropriately measured. RESULTS: The scale's internal consistency reached a value of 0.82, and the estimates of internal consistency and reliability also reached acceptable or very good values. Two-way ANOVA determined statistically significant effect of gestational age on the total score of the EVENDOL (F = 4.14; p = 0.045), younger infants had the lowest values, as lower values of Apgar-5° minute lowered the indicator "Interaction with the Environment" (F = 5.066; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: EVENDOL proved to be an easily applied tool and it was psychometrically robust, reliable and valid for use with both premature and term hospitalized newborns, who were clinically stable, being Apgar score and gestational age relevant factors. It is a reliable method of identifying pain in babies who need more support from the hospital staff and now is available for use in Portuguese language. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The EVENDOL pain scale is now validated for babies born at term and prematurely in Portuguese Language allowing its use in all Lusophone countries.