Transplantation of a cadaveric liver allograft with right lobe cavernous hemangioma, without back-table resection: a case report.

UNLABELLED: The use of extended criteria liver donors has become a necessity in an era of organ scarcity for transplantation. We present here a case report of orthotopic liver transplantation using a liver with a giant right lobe hemangioma without backtable resection. CASE REPORT: There were no data regarding the liver mass before organ procurement. The donor liver function tests and electrolyte profile were normal. During donor exploration a hemangioma was identified in segments V-VI, occupying approximately 20% of the total liver volume. It was prepared for transplantation on a sterile backtable without performing backtable hemangioma resection. A standard orthotropic liver transplant procedure was performed uneventfully, without veno-veno bypass. There was no bleeding from the hemangioma. The ischemic time was 9 hours and 20 minutes. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged at 19 days after the operation. The hemangiomas showed evolution with some decrease in size upon later follow-ups. No clinically important complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Our case and other previous reports show that even large hemangiomas should not be considered to be a contraindication to organ procurement. These benign lesions either could be left in situ and observed or resected.

Does donor's fatty liver change impact on early mortality and outcome of liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The effect of donor fatty liver on graft survival is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of steatosis on the outcomes of OLT among our recipients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of donor liver steatosis on postoperative liver function and prognosis. Data obtained from liver transplantation data registry of our organ transplant center. Liver biopsies taken before transplantation were reviewed by two pathologists. Pathology reports were divided into four groups: normal pathology; mild fatty change (10%-30%); moderate (30%-60%); and severe steatosis (>60%). Livers with severe steatosis were excluded from transplantation. Factors determining transplantation outcome, such as early mortality, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, clinical rejection episodes, and graft surgical complications, were compared between subjects who received donor liver, with various degrees of steatosis. RESULTS: Three-month survival rates in recipients without donor liver fatty change, subjects with mild fatty change (10%-30%) and those with moderate (30%-60%) steatosis were 68%, 72%, and 76%, respectively, which were not significantly different (P>.05). Furthermore, short-term (hospital) mortality (20%, 14.3%, and 21.2%), hospital stay (30.89, 29.93, and 23.62 days), and length of ICU admission (5.06, 5.89, and 4.39 days) were not significantly different. In addition, Child score of recipients, pre- and postoperative liver function enzyme changes were similar. CONCLUSION: Mild-to-moderate (up to 60%) liver fatty change was not found to be associated with a worse prognosis in OLT.

Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) occurs in 3% to 9% of all liver transplantations with acute graft failure as a possible sequel. METHODS: Eleven episodes of HAT were identified among 256 orthotropic liver transplantations (whole, LDCT, split) performed on 253 patients between April 1993 and July 2006. HAT was suspected clinically and confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, angiography, or reexploration. One patient was excluded due to poor follow-up. Treatment options included exploration with HA thrombectomy plus thrombolysis, retransplantation, or conservative treatment of hepatic and biliary complications. RESULTS: Among 11 patients of mean age 29.98 +/- 17.14 years (range, 10 months to 56 years). 2 had split right lobe liver transplantations and 9 received whole organs. None of LDLTs were identified to have HAT. The causes of liver cirrhosis among HAT patients were autoimmune hepatitis (n=3), cryptogenic (n=3), Wilson (n=1), PBC (n=1), biliary atresia (n=1), and HBs (n=1). HAT was diagnosed at 5.9 +/- 4.43 (range, 2 to 16) days after operation. Most patients developed right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain at presentation. Two patients developed acidosis, fever, or SIRS and underwent retransplantation. Four underwent exploration of HA and 1 was treated conservatively. Three cases expired due to HAT complications. CONCLUSION: We found RUQ pain to be the presenting sign of early HAT in majority of cases. RUQ pain has been reported to occur in late HAT. Whenever HAT is confirmed, liver transplanted patients should be revascularized or even retransplanted. Intra-arterial thrombolysis and thrombolytic therapy for HAT should be done cautiously due to the potential risk of hemorrhage.

The effect of clamping of inferior vena cava and portal vein on urine output during liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension, massive transfusion, liver disease, coexistent renal dysfunction, and decreased glomerular filtration rate during the anhepatic phase are major hazards for kidney function. We undertook this study to determine the change in urine output during clamping. METHOD: Twenty-four patients without preexistent renal disease, who were undergoing liver transplantation using the piggyback method, were enrolled in this study. Patients with a serum creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL were excluded. Urine output was monitored over 30 minutes before inferior vena cava and portal vein clamping, during clamping, and for 30 minutes after declamping. None of the patients had a clamping time >70 minutes. Our goal was to maintain mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate just by fluid administration diuretics were avoided. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 39.12 +/- 13.52 years (range, 15-67 years) with a male to female ratio of 1:4. Urine output 30 minutes before clamping was 3.64 +/- 3.58 (range, 1.25-15.18) mL/kg/h, decreased to 1.28 +/- 2.58 (range, 0-11.39) mL/kg/h during clamping (P=.00), and increased to 3.56 +/- 3.64 (range, 0.51-15.18) mL/kg/h 30 minutes after declamping (P=.00). CONCLUSION: Urine output was significantly reduced in all patients after clamping of the IVC and portal veins. This observation may be explained by increased venous pressure leading to decreased renal perfusion pressure. It has been stated that one of the advantages of veno-veno bypass (VVB) is increased renal perfusion pressure. However, if the clamping time in the piggyback method is <70 minutes and patients have normal preoperative renal function, the decreased renal perfusion pressure will not cause postoperative kidney dysfunction.