Integrative oncology research in the Middle East: weaving traditional and complementary medicine in supportive care.

INTRODUCTION: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has an important role in supportive cancer care in the Middle East and is often used in association with traditional medicine. This article provides a comprehensive review of published data on CAM research in supportive cancer care in the Middle East. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-disciplinary Middle-Eastern Research Group in Integrative Oncology (MERGIO) was established in six countries. Authors independently searched Medline database for articles in Arabic, Hebrew, French, and Turkish using oncology and CAM-related keywords. Articles were recorded according to the first author's affiliation with an academic or clinical institution in the Middle East. RESULTS: We identified 143 articles on CAM and cancer care that had been published in 12 Middle-Eastern countries. Eighty-five articles were directly related to cancer supportive care. The latter included studies on the prevalence of CAM use by patients with cancer, aspects related to of doctor-patient communication, ethics and regulation, psychosocial aspects of CAM, CAM safety and quality assurance, studies of CAM education for health care providers, and ethno-botanical studies and reviews. Twenty-eight articles referred to clinical research on supportive care, and the use of specific CAM modalities that included acupuncture, anthroposophic medicine, dietary and nutritional therapies herbal medicine, homeopathy, mind-body medicine, shiatsu, therapeutic touch, and yoga. CONCLUSIONS: CAM-related supportive care research is prevalent in the Middle East, a fact that may serve as a basis for future multinational-multidisciplinary research work in supportive care in oncology.

Validation and application of the Arabic version of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory in Moroccan patients with cancer.

CONTEXT: Little is known about symptom burden-a concept encompassing both symptom severity and the degree of symptom interference with daily living-in patients with cancer in Morocco or other countries with Arabic-speaking populations. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to psychometrically validate the Arabic version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-A), a tool for measuring multiple symptoms in patients with cancer, and to test its utility in a sample of patients with late-stage cancer in Morocco. METHODS: The MDASI-A was developed by standard forward-backward translation of the English MDASI. We used nonidiomatic Arabic in the MDASI-A to enhance its possible usefulness for all Arabic-speaking patients with cancer. One hundred sixty-five Arabic-speaking patients with various cancer types were recruited from a city hospital in Rabat, Morocco. The MDASI-A was administered by interview, as only 5% of the patients had a high school education. RESULTS: Psychometric analysis demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach alpha values of 0.85 for all 19 items, 0.78 for symptom severity items, and 0.79 for interference items; known-group validity was demonstrated by significant differences in mean symptom severity and interference between patients with good vs. poor performance status. All patients had moderate to severe pain and were taking pain medications. Additional severe symptoms included fatigue, lack of appetite, and disturbed sleep. Patients with gastrointestinal or gynecological cancer reported relatively more symptom severity than patients with breast or lung cancer. Poor performance status, male gender, and current infection were significant predictors of high symptom interference (R(2)=0.48, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The MDASI-A is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument that can be used to assess Moroccan Arabic-speaking cancer patients' multiple symptoms. Its utility for use in other Arab countries needs to be tested.