Applying the mixed-blessings model and labeling theory to stigma in inclusive education: An experimental study of student and trainee teachers' perceptions of pupils with ADHD, DLD, and intellectual disability.

Institutional and individual stigmatization represent major barriers that prevent children with disabilities from accessing education. It can be presumed that children with disabilities are labeled as such even in inclusive educational settings and that teachers' attitudes toward inclusive education and children with disabilities play a crucial role in this context. Against this background, the present study aims to (a) apply and conceptualize the mixed-blessings model in the context of stigma-related reactions to children's disability labels in inclusive education and (b) shed light on the causal attributions of teachers that underlie stigma-related attitudes toward children with various disabilities. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 online experiment examined the ways in which disability-specific causes and symptoms, the type of disability in question, the children's sex, and efficacy cues regarding educational efforts affect future teachers' attitudes toward and expectations of inclusive education as well as their social distance toward children with disabilities. The participants in this experiment were N = 605 German student and trainee teachers representing different types of teaching professions. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that, in particular, the cause attributed to the disability, the depicted type of disability and the probability of learning success led to changes in attitudes. Respondents' teaching self-efficacy and their status as students or trainees emerged as moderators of the effect of pupils' type of disability. As a result, teacher education and training as well as communication regarding pupils with disabilities require a high degree of sensitivity to disability-specific and efficacy-related cues to prevent (accidental) professional or institutional stigmatization.

[Gradients in Mental Health and Health Consciousness by the Degree of Disabilities - Results from representative GEDA-Survey in Germany]. / Behinderungsspezifischer Gradient in der psychischen Gesundheit und dem Gesundheitsbewusstsein.

PURPOSE: People with disabilities belong to a vulnerable population group, especially with regard to their economic and health situation. In the social-epidemiological research, hardly any studies on mental health and health awareness among people with disabilities are available using representative data, in particular not differentiated according to their degree of disability (DoD). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate 1) differences in mental health and health awareness between people with disabilities compared to people without disabilities. In addition, the study 2) shows differences mental health outcomes and health awareness, differentiated according to the DoD. METHODS: Data is used from the representative study "Gesundheit in Deutschland Aktuell (GEDA) 2012" (N=19,294). Outcomes were self-reported health, health awareness, depression or depressive mood, mental discomfort, vitality and psychological well-being. The exposure variable used was the recognized disability (DoD≥50 vs. DoD<50 vs. no disability). Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted using cross-tables and multivariate analyses using binary logistic regression models, controlled for socio-demographic, economic and health-related features. RESULTS: People with disabilities often rate their mental health worse than people without disabilities. The bi- and multivariate analyses revealed a disability-specific gradient for all outcome measures according to the DoD (p<0,001). People with disabilities had a significantly higher likelihood of poor mental health compared to people without disabilities. People with severe disabilities (DoD≥50) had a more than 4,6-fold increased likelihood risk of poor self-reported health and 2,5-fold likelihood of depression or depressed mood compared to people without disabilities. A high level of health awareness was more prevalent in PWD than in those without disabilities. CONCLUSION: The study highlights that People with disabilities more frequently reported mental health problems than people without disabilities. Targeted measures are necessary, which address in particular the target group of the people with disabilities. There is further need to strengthen access to health services and programs, assistive technologies and support services, and to make health of people with disabilities to the subject of research and health promotion in line with the WHO Action Plan on "Better health for all people with disabilities" (2014-2021).