ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To investigate the performance of a reconstruction algorithm, single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR), against standard reconstruction in cardiac computed tomography (CT) studies of patients with implanted metal and in a defibrillator lead phantom. METHODS: From a retrospective, cross-sectional clinical study with institutional review board approval of 118 patients with implanted metal, 122 cardiac CT studies from November 2009 to August 2016 performed on a 320-detector row scanner with standard and SEMAR reconstructions were included. The maximum beam hardening artifact radius, artifact attenuation variation surrounding the implanted metal, and image quality on a 4-point scale (1-no/minimal artifact to 4-severe artifact) were assessed for each reconstruction. A defibrillator lead phantom study was performed at different tube potentials and currents with both reconstruction methods. Maximum beam hardening artifact radius and average artifact attenuation variation were measured. RESULTS: In the clinical study, SEMAR markedly reduced the maximum beam hardening artifact radius by 77% (standard: 14.8 mm [IQR 9.7-22.2] vs. SEMAR: 3.4 mm [IQR 2.2-7.1], p < 0.0001) and artifact attenuation variation by 51% (standard: 130.0 HU [IQR 75.9-184.4] vs. SEMAR: 64.3 HU [IQR 48.2-89.2], p < 0.0001). Image quality improved with SEMAR (standard: 3 [IQR 2-3.5] vs. SEMAR: 2 [IQR 1-2.5], p < 0.0001). The defibrillator lead phantom study confirmed these results across varying tube potentials and currents. CONCLUSIONS: SEMAR reconstruction achieved superior image quality and markedly reduced maximum beam hardening artifact radius and artifact attenuation variation compared to standard reconstruction in 122 clinical cardiac CT studies of patients with implanted metal and in a defibrillator lead phantom study.
Subject(s)
Artifacts , Computed Tomography Angiography/instrumentation , Coronary Angiography/instrumentation , Metals , Phantoms, Imaging , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Defibrillators, Implantable , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis Design , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of adult congenital heart disease patients is limited due to concerns of high radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess whether low radiation dose cardiac CT is feasible to evaluate ventricular systolic function in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: The study group included 30 consecutive patients with significant congenital heart disease who underwent a total of 35 ECG-gated cardiac CT scans utilizing a 320-detector row CT scanner. Each study included a non-contrast scan and subsequent contrast-enhanced retrospectively-gated acquisition. Effective radiation dose was estimated by multiplying the dose length product by a k-factor of 0.014mSv/mGycm. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 34.4±8.9years, 60% were men, and mean body mass index was 24.2±4.3kg/m2. A majority of patients (n=28, 93.3%) had contraindications to cardiac MRI. A tube potential of 80kV was used in 27 (77.1%) of the contrast-enhanced scans. The mean signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were 11.5±3.9 and 10.3±3.7, respectively. The median radiation dose for non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images were 0.1mSv (0.07-0.2mSv) and 0.94mSv (0.5-2.1mSv), respectively. All 35 CT scans were successfully analyzed for ventricular systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: A low radiation contrast-enhanced, retrospectively-gated cardiac CT with a median radiation dose of less than 1mSv was successful in evaluating ventricular systolic function in 30 consecutive adult congenital heart disease patients who underwent a total of 35 scans.
