Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.

BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin threshold at which postoperative red-cell transfusion is warranted is controversial. We conducted a randomized trial to determine whether a higher threshold for blood transfusion would improve recovery in patients who had undergone surgery for hip fracture. METHODS: We enrolled 2016 patients who were 50 years of age or older, who had either a history of or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and whose hemoglobin level was below 10 g per deciliter after hip-fracture surgery. We randomly assigned patients to a liberal transfusion strategy (a hemoglobin threshold of 10 g per deciliter) or a restrictive transfusion strategy (symptoms of anemia or at physician discretion for a hemoglobin level of <8 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was death or an inability to walk across a room without human assistance on 60-day follow-up. RESULTS: A median of 2 units of red cells were transfused in the liberal-strategy group and none in the restrictive-strategy group. The rates of the primary outcome were 35.2% in the liberal-strategy group and 34.7% in the restrictive-strategy group (odds ratio in the liberal-strategy group, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.22), for an absolute risk difference of 0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -3.7 to 4.7). The rates of in-hospital acute coronary syndrome or death were 4.3% and 5.2%, respectively (absolute risk difference, -0.9%; 99% CI, -3.3 to 1.6), and rates of death on 60-day follow-up were 7.6% and 6.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 1.0%; 99% CI, -1.9 to 4.0). The rates of other complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A liberal transfusion strategy, as compared with a restrictive strategy, did not reduce rates of death or inability to walk independently on 60-day follow-up or reduce in-hospital morbidity in elderly patients at high cardiovascular risk. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; FOCUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00071032.).

HIV-Selectest enzyme immunoassay and rapid test: ability to detect seroconversion following HIV-1 infection.

HIV-Selectest is a serodiagnostic enzyme immunoassay (EIA), containing p6 and gp41 peptides, designed to differentiate between vaccine-induced antibodies and true infections. A rapid test version of the HIV-Selectest was developed. Both assays detected HIV antibodies in men and women within 2 to 4 weeks of infection, with sensitivity similar to third-generation EIAs.

Basic science focus on blood substitutes: a summary of the NHLBI Division of Blood Diseases and Resources Working Group Workshop, March 1, 2006.

In March 2006, a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute was convened to identify the role of basic science research in clarifying issues that are impeding progress in the development of hemoglobin-based oxygen carrying (HBOC) solutions. These discussions resulted in a consensus that, although HBOCs have shown clinical promise, various side effects have inhibited further development and regulatory approval, with cardiovascular events being of particular concern. As a consequence, workshop participants focused on formulating research recommendations to better understand and mitigate these side effects. In addition, several important corollary issues were identified, including better understanding of the impact of HBOC infusion on human physiology; the need for rapid, noninvasive methods for the measurement of tissue oxygenation in human patients to better inform transfusion decisions; further investigation of routes and consequences of hemoglobin metabolism; optimization of clinical protocols for HBOC use; and assessment of the impact of HBOC formulation excipients. Also discussed was the possibility and desirability of developing new HBOCs with improved characteristics, such as prolonged functional intravascular persistence, greater stability, and a decreased propensity to generate reactive oxygen species. One practical limitation in this area is the consistent availability of pure, well-characterized HBOC solutions for the research community. This communication summarizes the opinion of workshop participants on these issues and concludes with a list of specific recommended areas of research that could positively impact the development of blood substitutes.

Novel approach for differential diagnosis of HIV infections in the face of vaccine-generated antibodies: utility for detection of diverse HIV-1 subtypes.

Because increasing numbers of HIV vaccine candidates are being tested globally, it is essential to differentiate vaccine- from virus-induced antibodies. Most of the currently tested vaccines contain multiple viral components. As a result, many vaccine recipients give positive results in FDA-licensed HIV serodetection tests. We have identified conserved sequences in Env-gp41 and Gag-p6, which are recognized soon after infection but are not included in most HIV vaccine candidates. A new HIV serodetection assay, the HIV-SELECTEST, was established that distinguishes between vaccine-induced antibodies and seroconversion due to true HIV infections. It is important to make this assay globally relevant, because many clinical trials are conducted around the world where most HIV infections are due to non-B subtype HIV-1. Therefore, the current study examined the reactivity of plasma samples from >3,000 infections with diverse HIV subtypes worldwide. The HIV-SELECTEST performed at >99% specificity and sensitivity. Both recent and established infections with clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J, and CRFs were detected. Antibodies elicited by other vaccinations or infections endemic to the clinical trial sites did not react in this assay. Therefore, HIV-SELECTEST could be an important differential diagnostic tool for HIV vaccine trials, blood banks, and population screening worldwide.

West Nile virus infections projected from blood donor screening data, United States, 2003.

National blood donor screening for West Nile virus (WNV) RNA using minipool nucleic acid amplification testing (MP-NAT) was implemented in the United States in July 2003. We compiled national NAT yield data and performed WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing in 1 WNV-epidemic region (North Dakota). State-specific MP-NAT yield, antibody seroprevalence, and the average time RNA is detectable by MP-NAT were used to estimate incident infections in 2003. WNV donor screening yielded 944 confirmed viremic donors. MP-NAT yield peaked in August with >0.5% of donations positive for WNV RNA in 4 states. Peak IgM seroprevalence for North Dakota was 5.2% in late September. The average time viremia is detectable by MP-NAT was 6.9 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-10.7). An estimated 735,000 (95% CI 322,000-1,147,000) infections occurred in 2003, with 256 (95% CI 112-401) infections per neuroinvasive case. In addition to preventing transfusion-transmitted WNV infection, donor screening can serve as a tool to monitor seasonal incidence in the general population.

The 2003 West Nile virus United States epidemic: the America's Blood Centers experience.

BACKGROUND: A detailed assessment of West Nile virus (WNV) yield is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the WNV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) screening implemented in 2003. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WNV NAT screening and donation data were compiled from members of America's Blood Centers, which collect nearly 50 percent of the US blood supply. WNV RNA screening was performed with either the Gen-Probe/Chiron Procleix transcription-mediated amplification assay or the Roche TaqScreen polymerase chain reaction. Results of alternate NAT and WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody assays conducted on index and follow-up samples were obtained from test manufacturers. Presumed WNV positivity was based on NAT repeat reactivity of the individual index donation whereas confirmatory status was based on additional IgM testing of the index donation and NAT and serology testing of follow-up samples. RESULTS: From July through October 2003, 2.5 million donations were screened for WNV RNA. Of 877 NAT-reactive donations (screening positivity rate of 3.5 per 10,000 units), 430 (49%) were confirmed positive, whereas 68 (8%) lacking follow-up data remained presumed positive. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of a presumed viremic result relative to final confirmatory status were 92 and 99 percent, respectively. WNV activity was highest in the central plains with prevalence per 10,000 peaking August 1 to 15 in Colorado (67.7) and South Dakota (77.5) and August 16 to 31 in Wyoming (74.1) and North Dakota (102.0). CONCLUSIONS: WNV screening interdicted many viremic units, thereby reducing transfusion-transmitted infections. This study demonstrates that a national collaborative effort facilitates timely surveillance of blood donor infectious disease prevalence rates.

Progression of HIV disease among women following delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patterns of HIV disease progression among HIV-1-infected women following delivery. METHODS: Four hundred ninety-seven women enrolled in PACTG 185, a phase 3 trial of passive immunoprophylaxis in addition to zidovudine (ZDV) for the prevention of perinatal transmission, were included. Visits occurred twice during pregnancy; at delivery; and at 12, 26, 48, and 78 weeks postpartum. Repeated-measures linear regression and proportional hazards models were applied. RESULTS: Trial treatment (HIV hyperimmune globulin vs. immune globulin) was not related to postpartum disease progression. Longitudinal analysis of HIV-1 RNA demonstrated stable levels during pregnancy, significantly increased HIV-1 RNA by 12 weeks postpartum even on stable therapy, and a gradual increase thereafter. Changes in CD4+ lymphocyte percentage over 18 months of follow-up were similar for women continuing or stopping ZDV postpartum. Compared with those receiving no therapy, the hazard ratio for AIDS or death among women who received monotherapy postpartum was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.04), 0.17 (CI: 0.06-0.49) for women who received combination therapy, and 0.24 (CI: 0.06-1.01) for women who received highly active antiretroviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: RNA levels increased significantly from delivery to 12 weeks postpartum. Changes in HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ lymphocyte percentage were similar among women continuing or stopping therapy after delivery, and response to antiretroviral therapy was as expected postpartum.

Comparative sensitivity of HBV NATs and HBsAg assays for detection of acute HBV infection.

BACKGROUND: A study was designed to estimate relative analytic sensitivity and window-period (WP) closure and to project incremental yield of newer HBsAg tests, pooled-sample NAT, and single-sample NAT, compared to currently licensed HBsAg tests. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HBV DNA and HBsAg test results for 23 HBV seroconversion (SC) panels were first analyzed to construct a model of primary HBV viremia. One-hundred representative samples were then selected from 10 panels and coded with 28 analytical controls. All 128 samples were tested by seven HBsAg tests and by four pooled-sample and three single-sample NAT assay formats. Results were analyzed to obtain differential times to HBV detection and combined with HBV incidence rates to project comparative yields. RESULTS: HBV doubling time during the ramp-up phase was estimated at 2.56 days. HBsAg concentrations at cutoff for new tests ranged from 0.07 to 0.12 ng per mL, compared with 0.13 to 0.62 ng per mL for licensed tests. Estimated viral load at cutoff ranged from 102 to 267 IU per mL for new tests and from 363 to 1069 IU per mL for licensed tests. HBsAg tests detected 31 to 63 percent of early ramp-up phase samples in the 100-member seroconversion panel study, while pooled-sample NAT detected 55 to 71 percent and single-sample NAT, 82 to 99 percent. Compared with currently licensed HBsAg assays, newer HBsAg assays would reduce the WP by 2 to 9 days; pooled-sample NAT would reduce the WP by 9 to 11 days; and single-sample NAT would reduce the WP by 25 to 36 days. CONCLUSION: Newer HBsAg tests would be expected to detect an additional 15 to 21 infected units per 107 donations, compared to licensed HBsAg tests. Sensitivity, WP closure, and yield projections for newer HBsAg assays and pooled-sample NAT are comparable. Single-sample NAT would increase yield by 13 to 15 units per 107 donations over pooled-sample NAT and newer HBsAg assays and by 35 to 50 units per 107 donations over currently licensed HBsAg assays.