Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Global Health ; 16(1): 84, 2020 09 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957999

ABSTRACT

Nepal, a South Asian country, was in nationwide lockdown for nearly three months in 2020 with partial restrictions still in place. Much worryingly, COVID-19 induced restrictions have confined women and young girls in their home, increasing the risk of domestic violence. The available support system to respond to violence against women and girls (VAWG) has also been disrupted during this period. The figures of violence against women, and child sexual abuse are increasingly being reported during the lockdown and thereafter. To mitigate this, a response against VAWG should not be a missing agenda. This commentary focuses on the situation of VAWG during COVID-19 induced restrictions in Nepal and offers a way forward for addressing the issue.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Domestic Violence/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19 , Child , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Nepal/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Risk Assessment
2.
Int J Equity Health ; 19(1): 87, 2020 06 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503613

ABSTRACT

Due to the ongoing nationwide lockdown in Nepal, women and children face a greater risk of malnutrition and eventually leading to mortality and morbidity. To harness the progress made so far in improving the nutritional status of women and children, a focus on nutrition should be a part of the COVID-19 response plan.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Nutritional Status , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Child , Female , Humans , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Nepal/epidemiology , Pandemics
3.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 13: 80, 2015 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the past decades, various frameworks, methods, indicators, and tools have been developed to assess the needs as well as to monitor and evaluate (needs assessment, monitoring and evaluation; "NaME") health research capacity development (HRCD) activities. This systematic review gives an overview on NaME activities at the individual and organizational level in the past 10 years with a specific focus on methods, tools and instruments. Insight from this review might support researchers and stakeholders in systemizing future efforts in the HRCD field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Additionally, the personal bibliographies of the authors were scanned. Two researchers independently reviewed the identified abstracts for inclusion according to previously defined eligibility criteria. The included articles were analysed with a focus on both different HRCD activities as well as NaME efforts. RESULTS: Initially, the search revealed 700 records in PubMed, two additional records in Google Scholar, and 10 abstracts from the personal bibliographies of the authors. Finally, 42 studies were included and analysed in depth. Findings show that the NaME efforts in the field of HRCD are as complex and manifold as the concept of HRCD itself. NaME is predominately focused on outcome evaluation and mainly refers to the individual and team levels. CONCLUSION: A substantial need for a coherent and transparent taxonomy of HRCD activities to maximize the benefits of future studies in the field was identified. A coherent overview of the tools used to monitor and evaluate HRCD activities is provided to inform further research in the field.


Subject(s)
Capacity Building/standards , Health Services Research/standards , Needs Assessment/standards , Capacity Building/methods , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Health Services Research/methods , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Humans , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Program Evaluation/methods , Program Evaluation/standards
4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 59(10): 726-31, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19813695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the drug dispensing practices and patients' knowledge on drug use among the outpatients and to identify and analyze the problems in drug prescribing and dispensing. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using World Health Organization (WHO) core drug use indicators from July 13, 2008 to August 15, 2008 in Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. RESULTS: A total of 4231 prescriptions were encountered with the total of 10591 drugs prescribed. The average number of drug per prescription was 2.5. Only 13% (n=10591) of drugs were prescribed by generic name. Percentage of drug prescribed from WHO model list of Essential drugs, Essential drug list of Nepal and Nepalese National Formulary was 21.7%, 32.8% and 42.3% respectively. Antibiotics and injections encountered were 28.3% and 3.1% respectively. Average cost per prescription was found to be Nepalese Rupees (NRs) 285.99 (US $ 3.73). Patient knowledge on correct use of drugs and appropriate labeling was found to be 81% and 1.4% respectively. Average dispensing time per prescription was 52 seconds. CONCLUSION: The finding from current study shows a trend towards irrational prescribing and dispensing. Hence, there is a need for effective intervention programme to encourage the physicians and dispensing pharmacists in promoting more rational drug use.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nepal , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...