Síndrome de Nicolau por fármacos autoinyectables en la esclerosis múltiple / Nicolau syndrome due to self-injectable drugs in multiple sclerosis

Introducción y objetivos: El síndrome de Nicolau, o embolia cutis medicamentosa, es una complicación cutánea infrecuente de los fármacos inyectados que se ha descrito escasamente en relación con los fármacos empleados en la esclerosis múltiple. Pacientes y métodos: Es un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes afectos de síndrome de Nicolau que reciben fármacos autoinyectables para la esclerosis múltiple desde 2010 hasta octubre de 2022. Resultados: Desde enero de 2010 hasta octubre de 2022 se ha seguido en nuestra consulta de patología desmielinizante a 449 pacientes con fármacos autoinyectables –317 con interferón beta y 132 con acetato de glatiramer (AG)–. En este período de tiempo se han recogido 10 episodios de síndrome de Nicolau en siete pacientes (seis hombres y una mujer) que recibían AG, lo que supone un 5,3% del total de pacientes bajo ese tratamiento. Las zonas más afectadas fueron el glúteo (n = 4) y el brazo (n = 3). Tres pacientes (42,8%) sufrieron un segundo episodio. Conclusión: El síndrome de Nicolau es una complicación exclusiva del AG y más frecuente en hombres en nuestra cohorte de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple. La recurrencia de esta complicación cutánea es frecuente en un mismo paciente, lo que es un factor que hay que tener en cuenta en la decisión de mantener el fármaco o cambiar a otra estrategia terapéutica.(AU)

Introduction and aims: Nicolau syndrome, or embolia cutis medicamentosa, is a rare cutaneous complication of drug injection that has been rarely described in relation to medication used in multiple sclerosis. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with Nicolau syndrome receiving self-injectable multiple sclerosis medication from 2010 to October 2022. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 449 patients were followed up in our demyelinating pathology unit with self-injectable drugs - 317 with beta interferons and 132 with glatiramer acetate (GA). In this period of time, 10 episodes of Nicolau syndrome were recorded in seven patients (six men and one woman) receiving GA, which represents 5.3% of the total number of patients receiving this treatment. The most commonly affected areas were the buttocks (n = 4) and the arms (n = 3). Three patients (42.8%) suffered a second episode. Conclusion: Nicolau syndrome is a complication unique to GA and more frequent in men in our cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. This cutaneous complication frequently recurs in the same patient, which is a factor to be taken into account in the decision to maintain the drug or switch to another therapeutic strategy.(AU)

[Nicolau syndrome due to self-injectable drugs in multiple sclerosis]. / Síndrome de Nicolau por fármacos autoinyectables en la esclerosis múltiple.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Nicolau syndrome, or embolia cutis medicamentosa, is a rare cutaneous complication of drug injection that has been rarely described in relation to medication used in multiple sclerosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with Nicolau syndrome receiving self-injectable multiple sclerosis medication from 2010 to October 2022. RESULTS: From January 2010 to October 2022, 449 patients were followed up in our demyelinating pathology unit with self-injectable drugs - 317 with beta interferons and 132 with glatiramer acetate (GA). In this period of time, 10 episodes of Nicolau syndrome were recorded in seven patients (six men and one woman) receiving GA, which represents 5.3% of the total number of patients receiving this treatment. The most commonly affected areas were the buttocks (n = 4) and the arms (n = 3). Three patients (42.8%) suffered a second episode. CONCLUSION: Nicolau syndrome is a complication unique to GA and more frequent in men in our cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. This cutaneous complication frequently recurs in the same patient, which is a factor to be taken into account in the decision to maintain the drug or switch to another therapeutic strategy.

TITLE: Síndrome de Nicolau por fármacos autoinyectables en la esclerosis múltiple.Introducción y objetivos. El síndrome de Nicolau, o embolia cutis medicamentosa, es una complicación cutánea infrecuente de los fármacos inyectados que se ha descrito escasamente en relación con los fármacos empleados en la esclerosis múltiple. Pacientes y métodos. Es un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes afectos de síndrome de Nicolau que reciben fármacos autoinyectables para la esclerosis múltiple desde 2010 hasta octubre de 2022. Resultados. Desde enero de 2010 hasta octubre de 2022 se ha seguido en nuestra consulta de patología desmielinizante a 449 pacientes con fármacos autoinyectables ­317 con interferón beta y 132 con acetato de glatiramer (AG)­. En este período de tiempo se han recogido 10 episodios de síndrome de Nicolau en siete pacientes (seis hombres y una mujer) que recibían AG, lo que supone un 5,3% del total de pacientes bajo ese tratamiento. Las zonas más afectadas fueron el glúteo (n = 4) y el brazo (n = 3). Tres pacientes (42,8%) sufrieron un segundo episodio. Conclusión. El síndrome de Nicolau es una complicación exclusiva del AG y más frecuente en hombres en nuestra cohorte de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple. La recurrencia de esta complicación cutánea es frecuente en un mismo paciente, lo que es un factor que hay que tener en cuenta en la decisión de mantener el fármaco o cambiar a otra estrategia terapéutica.

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and natalizumab-Is it possible before removing the drug?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with natalizumab have a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate; in these patients, a relapse is uncommon but not unexpected. In contrast, the appearance of a severe exacerbation is striking and requires the differential diagnosis with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Here, we describe a case of a 22-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting MS who developed an unexpected response after the patient׳s fifth natalizumab infusion with an aggressive radiological and clinical evolution. Changing the patient׳s treatment to fingolimod resulted in the absence of new clinical relapses and the absence of active lesions on brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) during the first 12 months of follow-up. We hypothesize that the appearance of natalizumab antibodies in this patient triggered lymphocyte migration to the central nervous system in a rebound phenomenon; this is similar to what occurs during immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after removal of natalizumab.

[Change of treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis and its consequences in clinical practice]. / Cambio de tratamiento en pacientes con esclerosis multiple y sus consecuencias en la practica clinica.

INTRODUCTION: Thirty per cent of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) present a suboptimal response to treatment in the first few years. The real impact of the change of treatment has still not been well established. AIMS: To describe our clinical practice with regard to the change of treatment in MS patients with a suboptimal response and to analyse their progress depending on our therapeutic decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is observation-based and retrospective. The sample was made up of patients with relapsing-remitting MS and at least one event after establishing immunomodulatory treatment. Both the intention to change treatment and the delays until the actual change took place were taken into account. The theoretical consequences of these strategies were measured by the changes in the expected curve of the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS). RESULTS: A comparison of those who changed immunomodulator with those that did not showed that 64.3% versus 35.3%, respectively, improved on the expected curve of the MSSS (p > 0.05). Patients who improved the expected curve of the MSSS had changed treatment before those who did not improve (1.9 months versus 6 months), although the differences were not significant. The mean time that elapsed between taking the decision to change and actually changing the treatment was 2.70 ± 3.55 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations due to the size of the sample, the patients with a suboptimal response who changed treatment early could benefit from an improvement in their expected progression on the MSSS.