Costing analysis of a digital first-line treatment platform for patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis in Sweden.

Osteoarthritis (OA) constitutes a major and increasing burden on patients, health care systems and the broader society. It is estimated that around a quarter of the adult population is affected by OA in the knee and hip and that the prevalence of OA will increase over the coming decades largely due to aging and adverse life-style factors. Prevention and effective care are critical to manage the challenges posed by OA. Digital technologies offer opportunities to deliver cost-effective care for chronic diseases, including for OA. We report the results of a costing analysis of a new digital platform for delivering first-line care including disease information and physiotherapy to patients with OA and compare this with an existing face-to-face model of treatment. Both models are in accordance with National Treatment Guidelines in Sweden. The results show that overall the digital model costs around 25% of the existing face-to-face model of care. Based on existing evidence on the effects of these models, our findings also suggest that the digital platform offers a cost-effective alternative to the existing model of OA care. Depending on the extent to which the digital model substitutes for the existing model of care, significant resources can be saved.

On the waiting list for joint replacement for knee osteoarthritis: Are first-line treatment recommendations implemented?

Objective: To investigate to what extent individuals participated in guideline-based first-line treatments before being assigned to a wait list for knee replacement for osteoarthritis (OA), and to what extent they were recommended such treatments once on the list. Factors associated with participation in first-line management were also investigated. Design: All patients on the waiting list ≥ three months for knee replacement due to knee OA (n = 229) at a public hospital in Sweden were invited to participate in this cross-sectional survey study. 136 individuals (mean age 70 ± 9 years, 59% women) answered self-reported questionnaires including demographics, physical activity level, knee function and treatments before and during their time on the waiting list. Results: Before being referred to the waiting list, 40% had participated in guideline-based OA management (Better management of patients with OsteoArthritis (BOA)), 53% in physiotherapy, 67% in either BOA or physiotherapy whilst 23% of those overweight (BMI≥25) had received weight-management advice. Women had participated in BOA and physiotherapy twice as often as men (51% vs. 25%, p = 0.002 and 66% vs. 34%, p < 0.001) prior to waiting list referral. During their time on the waiting list, only 10% were recommended BOA, 30% physiotherapy and 15% weight-management. 38% of the patients that had never participated in BOA indicated that they were interested in participating while waiting for their knee replacement. Conclusion: Our results suggest that recommended treatment guidelines for OA may not be adequately implemented in Swedish health-care. Further exploration of implementation barriers and lack of equality of care appears warranted.

"I was considering surgery because I believed that was how it was treated": a qualitative study on willingness for joint surgery after completion of a digital management program for osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore, using a qualitative approach, reasons for patients' continued willingness or their shift in willingness for total joint replacement (TJR) surgery, following participation in Joint Academy, a Swedish, digital, non-surgical treatment program for osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Nineteen patients with hip or knee OA were interviewed after finishing their first 6 weeks in the treatment program, using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a systematic text condensation method. RESULTS: Analysis of the interview data revealed three main categories of reasons provided for the participants' decisions regarding surgery: 1) Various reasons for participating in Joint Academy with three sub-categories: (a) longstanding pain affects daily life, (b) last chance for improvement and (c) mandatory treatment to be eligible for total joint replacements (TJR); 2) Willingness for TJR following treatment, which included four sub-categories: (a) surgery - the last resort, (b) reduced pain and improved functioning, (c) no perceived improvements after treatment, and (d) trust in healthcare providers; and 3) Expectations of TJR. The shift in willingness towards or away from TJR was mainly due to the perceived success of Joint Academy in improving their functioning. CONCLUSION: Several patients reconsidered their options and had changed their attitude to TJR after participation in a digital program aimed at reducing OA symptoms and improving functioning. These results highlight the importance of providing patients with adequate information about non-surgical management options to facilitate shared decision-making, and possibly reduce the need for surgery.

Calibration and cross-validation of a wrist-worn Actigraph in young preschoolers.

OBJECTIVE: To calibrate the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer for wrist-worn placement in young preschoolers by developing intensity thresholds for sedentary, low- and high-intensity physical activity. Furthermore, to cross-validate the developed thresholds in young preschoolers. METHODS: Actigraph GT3X+ was used to measure physical activity during structured activities and free play in 38 children (15-36 months). Activity was video recorded and scored into sedentary, low- and high-intensity physical activity based on Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS) and combined with accelerometer data using a 5 s epoch. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to develop intensity thresholds in 26 randomly selected children. The remaining 12 children were used for cross-validation. RESULTS: Intensity thresholds for sedentary were ≤89 vertical counts (Y) and ≤221 vector magnitude (VM) counts per 5 s and ≥440 Y counts and ≥730 VM counts per 5 s for high-intensity physical activity. Sensitivity and specificity were 60-100% for the developed intensity thresholds. Strong correlations (Spearman rank correlation 0.69-0.91) were found in the cross-validation sample between the developed thresholds for the accelerometer and CARS scoring time in all intensity categories. CONCLUSION: The developed intensity thresholds appear valid to categorize sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensity categories in children 2 years of age.

Infant growth is associated with parental education but not with parental adiposity - Early Stockholm Obesity Prevention Project.

AIM: To explore the simultaneous impact of parental adiposity and education level on infant growth from birth to 12 months, adjusting for known early-life risk factors for subsequent childhood obesity. METHODS: Baseline data for 197 one-year-old children and their parents, participating in a longitudinal obesity intervention, were used. Obesity risk groups, high/low, were defined based on parental body mass index (n = 144/53) and parental education (n = 57/139). Observational data on infant growth between 0 and 12 months were collected. The children's relative weight (body mass index standard deviation score) at 3, 6 and 12 months and rapid weight gain 0-6 months were analysed in regression models, with obesity risk as primary exposure variables, adjusting for gestational weight gain, birth weight, short exclusive breastfeeding and maternal smoking. RESULTS: Relative weight at 3, 6 and 12 months was associated with low parental education but not with parental adiposity. No significant associations were observed with rapid weight gain. None of the early-life factors could explain the association with parental education. CONCLUSION: Low parental education level is independently associated with infant growth, whereas parental obesity does not contribute to a higher weight or to rapid weight gain during the first year.

The bone-anchored auricular episthesis.

Total ablation of the pinna gives an unsatisfactory cosmetic result which has to be corrected. Plastic surgery procedures are generally not very successful and some sort of episthesis is preferred by many. The attachment of an episthesis is, however, often a problem. This paper is a case report of a new type of episthesis fixation arrangement. In a first session four titanium screws were implanted into the temporal bone above and behind the external meatus with a technique ensuring minimal tissue violation. Three months later when these screws were firmly integrated in the living bone, skin-penetrating titanium abutments were connected and a gold bridge was adapted to the abutments. A silicon rubber episthesis was attached to the bridge with a snap fastener. Behind this new method of episthesis attachment are several years of clinical experience of titanium implants directly anchored into various living bones and allowed to permanently penetrate skin or mucous membrane.