[Prevention of type 1 diabetes: what have we achieved? What should we say and propose next to families?]. / Prévention du diabète de type 1. Où en sommes-nous? Que dire et proposer aux familles?

Prevention of type 1 diabetes in high risk individuals presents with both positive and negative aspects. On one hand, the availability of reliable and convenient screening tools (antibodies) allows us to quantify the risk of diabetes in the short term. Large randomised studies have provided indisputable answers regarding the efficiency of selection of at risk patients. Unfortunately, both DPT-1 study (using insulin) and ENDIT trial (with nicotinamide) ruined the hopes raised from solid experimental data. These studies have also demonstrated the huge costs in terms of number of subjects, time for follow-up, and financial burden, requiring an international collaboration. Finally, only a small number of such studies can be conducted simultaneously. Progress and obstacles paving this research area must be explained to diabetic patients and their family. Current mitigated results should not drive us to give up screening campaigns. Rather, these results should prompt diabetes centers and families to participate in the selection of high risk individuals in order to explore new therapeutic options within future prevention trials.

Specific deficiency of p56lck expression in T lymphocytes from type 1 diabetic patients.

Peripheral T lymphocyte activation in response to TCR/CD3 stimulation is reduced in type 1 diabetic patients. To explore the basis of this deficiency, a comprehensive analysis of the signal transduction pathway downstream of the TCR/CD3 complex was performed for a cohort of patients (n = 38). The main result of the study shows that T cell hyporesponsiveness is positively correlated with a reduced amount of p56(lck) in resting T lymphocytes. Upon CD3-mediated activation, this defect leads to a hypophosphorylation of the CD3zeta-chain and few other polypeptides without affecting the recruitment of ZAP70. Other downstream effectors of the TCR/CD3 transduction machinery, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p85alpha, p59(fyn), linker for activation of T cells (LAT), and phospholipase C-gamma1, are not affected. In some patients, the severity of this phenotypic deficit could be linked to low levels of p56(lck) mRNA and resulted in the failure to efficiently induce the expression of the CD69 early activation marker. We propose that a primary deficiency in human type 1 diabetes is a defect in TCR/CD3-mediated T cell activation due to the abnormal expression of the p56(lck) tyrosine kinase.

Constitutive impaired TCR/CD3-mediated activation of T cells in IDDM patients co-exist with normal co-stimulation pathways.

IDDM is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease which is paradoxically associated with T cell functional deficiencies. The proliferative response of PBMC under CD3-, Vbeta2-, Vbeta8- and Vbeta7-stimulation was investigated in IDDM and NIDDM patients, non-diabetic first-degree relatives and control subjects. Despite normal surface expression of the TCR/CD3 complex, the TCR/CD3-mediated proliferation of PBMC from IDDM patients was significantly impaired compared to control subjects (P<0.05). This defect was specific for the autoimmune disease, constitutive and not linked to the class II MHC genotype, to metabolic disturbances or to presence of specific autoantibodies. Inefficient activation of T cells was not related to a lower capacity of CD28 to transduce co-stimulative signals because proliferative responses under CD2/CD28 stimulations were similar in IDDM and control groups. The IL-2/IL-2 receptor system was functional because unstimulated PBMC proliferated in response to increasing amounts of IL-2. Nevertheless, despite normal expression of CD25, addition of IL-2 did not normalize the proliferative defect linked to IDDM. In conclusion, excluding a faulty co-stimulation pathway, these results are in favour of a constitutive defect in the CD3/TCR transduction machinery, increasing sensitivity to apoptosis or anergy in T cells from IDDM patients.

Diverging evolution of anti-GAD and anti-IA-2 antibodies in long-standing diabetes mellitus as a function of age at onset: no association with complications.

Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GAD-A) and tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 autoantibodies (IA2-A) were measured in sera of 50 recently diagnosed (<6 wk, 33% younger than 15 yr), 19 short-term (1 to 9 yr, 35% with onset age below 15 yr) and 89 long-standing diabetic patients (>10 yr, 57% with onset age below 15 yr). Complications were assessed by clinical examination, retinal angiographs and microalbuminuria measurement. Both prevalences and levels of GAD-A and IA2-A decreased with increasing duration of diabetes. However even in those with long duration diabetes, 15 to 63% of the sera were still positive for one or two antibodies. In the group with onset after the age of 15 yr, significantly higher prevalences and levels of GAD-A (but not IA2-A) was observed in comparison with the group with earlier onset. No association was found with any microvascular complications in any group. We conclude that GAD-A and IA2-A persist in some diabetic patients, despite a long duration. Persistence of GAD-A was greatest in those with postpubertal disease onset. We speculate that persistence of some beta-cells or specific environmental factors can sustain one autoimmune reaction especially in some postpubertal-onset diabetic patients.