Bacterial infections after intestine and multivisceral transplantation. The experience of the University of Miami (1994-2001).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bacterial infections (BI) are frequent after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Bacteremia, intraabdominal and respiratory infections are the leading forms. The objective of this study is to analyze the occurrence, determinants and outcome of BI. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty-four patients with ITx (39 isolated, 33 liver-intestine, 63 multivisceral). Only major BI were considered, including bacteremia, pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, severe wound infections. RESULTS: BI occurred in 92.7% of patients during follow-up, with an average of 2.9 episodes per patient. Bacteremia was the commonest picture (1.7 per patient). More than 80% of patients had a BI before the end of the second month. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of BI was higher during the first 2 months after Itx in patients hospitalized before Tx [p=0.029, odds ratio (OR) 5.4] and during months 3 to 6 in those treated with Zenapax (p=0.003, OR 6.2). Occurrence of BI was increased with mycophenolate mofetil treatment (p=0.045 OR 4.2). Intraabdominal infection was more frequent when reTx was needed (p=0.0178 OR 15.2), admission before Tx (p=0.034 OR 2.7), IS with MMF (p=0.004 OR 6.2) and Zenapax (p=0.026 OR 3.6). BI was the direct cause of death in 17.8% of patients, and it was present in 76.2% of patients that died. An infectious episode during the first month, a clinically manifested abdominal infection and a positive intraabdominal culture were determinants of shorter patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: BI continue to be a frequent and dreadful complication after ITx. Pretransplant patient condition, IS used and postoperative complications are crucial on BI onset and outcome.

Intestinal transplantation: advances in immunosuppression and surgical techniques.

Campath-1H is being used as induction immunosuppression for intestinal/multivisceral transplantation. Patient and graft survival in this preliminary experience is similar to previous studies but there has been a significant decrease in the incidence and severity of acute rejections without increase of opportunistic infections. Collage of the abdominal wall (transplantation of a composite graft of the abdominal wall) can provide biologic coverage of the newly transplanted abdominal organs if necessary. Partial abdominal exenteration, ex vivo resection, and intestinal autotransplantation may be useful in removing otherwise unresectable lesions of the root of the mesentery.

Bacterial infections after intestine and multivisceral transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of bacterial infections (BI) in intestinal transplant (IT) patients is high with sepsis being the leading cause of death after this procedure. We herein report our experience with major BI to ascertain the incidence, microbiological and clinical factors, risk factors and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 124 patients (72 children and 52 adults) received 135 grafts: namely, 39 isolated intestine, 33 liver-intestine and 63 multivisceral. Only major BI were considered, namely, those associated with serious morbidity/mortality requiring specific therapy. Patient data were retrieved from computerized databases, flow-charts, and medical records. RESULTS: 92.7% patients showed BI. There were 327 episodes, representing 2.6 episodes/patient (2.8/patients with infection): 193 episodes of bacteremia (1.7/patient with BI) including 29.5% due to catheter related sepsis, 16.5% from abdominal source, 5.7% from respiratory origin and 4.1% from the wound. The organ locations includes 46 respiratory infections, 33 intraabdominal abscesses or infected fluid collections, 8 diffuse peritonitis, 34 wound infections and other miscellaneous sites: empyema, soft tissue infections, cholangitis em leader etc. Median time of infection was nine days after surgery (mean 22+/-3 days), with 67.7% patients having at least one BI before the end of the first month. Infection was present in 76.2% of the 63 deceased patients. An infectious episode during month 1, a clinically manifest abdominal infection and a positive intraabdominal culture had negative impacts on patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: BI are common and early complications after IT. The high rate of bacteremia, line sepsis and abdominal and respiratory infections reflect the recipient's condition, with chronic deterioration superimposed with the effects of prolonged abdominal visceral surgery.

Serum citrulline and rejection in small bowel transplantation: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: There is no known serum marker for intestinal rejection. Serum concentrations of the amino acid citrulline arise almost exclusively from the intestinal mucosa. We examined the impact of acute cellular rejection (ACR) of intestinal allografts on serum citrulline levels. METHODS: Citrulline concentrations were assayed in serum samples of healthy volunteers (n=6) and seven patients who underwent small bowel transplants (SBTx). Trends in mean citrulline concentrations versus degree of ACR were assessed by matching posttransplantation citrulline concentrations with patients' grade of ACR at time of serum collection. Rejection was confirmed by biopsy and graded by following standardized criteria. An additional patient had citrulline concentrations determined for 31 sequential specimens 3-60 days posttransplant. RESULTS: Mean citrulline concentrations in controls were significantly higher than posttransplantation samples at any rejection grade. Mean concentrations declined significantly as rejection severity increased. The overall downward trend was statistically significant (P<0.05). In sequential measurements, citrulline levels increased significantly over time with declining severity of rejection. The increase in mean citrulline concentration between posttransplant days 3-16 and 52-60 was significant (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum citrulline levels decline with increasing grade of ACR and may be a useful serum marker for intestinal rejection.

Graft survival in pediatric liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Liver transplantation is standard therapy for children with a variety of liver diseases. The current shortage of organ donors has led to aggressive use of reduced or split grafts and living-related donors to provide timely liver transplants to these children. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of these techniques on graft survival in children currently treated with liver transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained on all patients less than 21 years of age treated with isolated liver transplants performed after January 1, 1996 in an integrated statewide pediatric liver transplant program, which encompasses 2 high-volume centers. Nonparametric tests of association and life table analysis were used to analyze these data (SAS v 6.12). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three children received 147 grafts (62 at the University of Florida, 85 at the University of Miami). Fifty-two (36%) children were less than 1 year of age at time of transplant, and 80 (55%) were less than 2 years of age. Patient survival rate was identical in the 2 centers (1-year actuarial survival rate, 88.4% and 87.1%). Twenty-five (17%) grafts were reduced, 28 (19%) were split, 6 were from living donors (4%), and 88 (60%) were whole organs. One-year graft survival rate was 80% for whole grafts, 71.6% for reduced grafts, and 64.3% for split grafts (P =.06). Children who received whole organs (mean age, 6.1 years) were older than those who received segmental grafts (mean age, 2.5 years; P <.01). Multifactorial analysis suggested that patient age, gender, and use of the graft for retransplant did not influence graft survival, nor did the type of graft used influence patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of children after liver transplantation is excellent independent of graft type. Use of current techniques to split grafts between 2 recipients is associated with an increased graft loss and need for retransplantation. Improvement in graft survival of these organs could reduce the morbidity and cost of liver transplantation significantly in children.

Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation.

HYPOTHESIS: Histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important prognostic factor affecting patient survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University-based teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Of 952 OLTs performed between June 1991 and January 1999, 56 OLT recipients had histologically proven HCC in the explant liver. Of those, 53 patients with complete clinicopathologic data were analyzed. A single pathologist blinded to the outcome of each patient reviewed all histological specimens. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 709 days. Overall survival for patients with tumors sized 5 cm or less at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87%, 78%, and 71%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier). Univariate analysis revealed the size, number, and distribution of tumors; the presence of microscopic vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis; histological differentiation; and pTNM stage to be statistically significant factors affecting survival. Multivariate analysis revealed histological differentiation and pTNM stage to be the independent and statistically significant factors affecting survival (P =.002 and.03, respectively). When pTNM stage was excluded from multivariate analysis, histological differentiation and size remained the significant independent factors (P =.02 and.03, respectively). Three-year survival for patients with small (5 cm) tumor with well- to moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated HCC was 62.5% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective experience, histological differentiation had a statistically significant effect on the prognosis of HCC after OLT. However, before altering the current OLT selection criteria for patients with HCC, prospective studies are required to confirm the impact of histological grade on clinical outcome.

Abdominal wall closure after intestinal transplantation.

Successful surgical closure of the abdominal wall after either combined or isolated intestinal transplantation may present a challenging dilemma for the plastic and reconstructive surgeon because of the following factors: restricted volume of the recipient abdominal cavity; donor-recipient size discrepancies as expressed by the donor to recipient weight ratio; and significant intraoperative edema. The purpose of this investigation is to present clinical experience with 51 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 57 sequential intestinal transplantations at the University of Miami-Jackson Memorial Hospital. A retrospective chart review of 36 pediatric (63 percent) and 21 adult (37 percent) transplantations was performed. Age of the pediatric population ranged from 1 month to 13 years (mean, 2.4 years) and of the adult population from 22 to 55 years (mean, 33.5 years). Several diagnostic classifications necessitated organ transplantation. Because of insufficient donor graft size for the recipient abdominal cavity in 19 transplantations (33 percent), several technical modifications were used to achieve anatomic and functional abdominal wall closure in all patients. In summary, the plastic and reconstructive surgeon should have a significant role in the comprehensive planning and management of abdominal wall closure in this challenging group of patients.

Graft failure secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis in multi-visceral transplantation recipients: two case reports.

We report on two recipients of multi-visceral grafts who exhibited sudden onset of acute abdomen discomfort 2 weeks post-transplantation after a fairly uneventful immediate post-operative course. Both patients were shown to have pneumatosis intestinalis and one had air in the portal vein. Both patients underwent exploration, which showed non-viable intestine (terminal ileum and colon in the first patient and the entire small intestine distal to the ligament of Treitz in the second patient). There was no vascular thrombosis. The necrotic intestine was resected in both cases. The first patient developed sepsis and died 15 days later despite the rescue efforts. The second patient was re-transplanted twice and is doing well. The histopathology of the segments involved revealed cryptitis, vasculitis, and features of transmural necrosis. Accordingly, both clinical and pathologic features are diagnostic of necrotizing enterocolitis. To our knowledge this is the first report of this complication following intestinal or multi-visceral transplantation.

Inclusion of entire pancreas in the composite liver and intestinal graft in pediatric intestinal transplantation.

An entire pancreatico-duodenal complex was included in the liver and intestinal graft in eight children who received small-size grafts. This method showed several advantages compared to the traditional approach. They included reducing time for graft preparation by eliminating donor pancreas resection, no necessity of biliary reconstruction and leaving natural tissue support for blood vessels. The method was not associated with an increased risk of complications such as pancreatitis or rejection. It should be considered in pediatric liver and intestinal transplant recipients who require small-size grafts.

Multivisceral transplantation for megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder causing a functional neonatal bowel obstruction. Its etiopathogenesis is not fully understood. The prognosis is poor in the majority of cases; most patients die before the age of 6 months. In this report, we describe our experience with three patients with MMIHS in whom multivisceral transplantation was performed. METHODS: Three patients with MMIHS underwent multivisceral transplantation. All patients were females with a history of long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with TPN-related cholestatic liver disease. RESULTS: Patient 1 died 17 months after transplantation because of aspiration after revision of her feeding gastrostomy. At the time of death, the graft was functioning and the patient was completely off TPN. Patient 2 is alive 17 months after transplant. She is a fully functional, active 2-year-old and has also recently begun oral feeding after intensive rehabilitation. Patient 3 died on day 44 of multisystem failure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report in the literature of multivisceral transplantation for MMIHS. Although one of the three patients died 44 days after surgery from multiorgan system failure, the other two patients had long-term survival after transplant and both grew well on enteral feeding alone. One patient died 17 months from a non-transplant-related complication, while the other is living at home off of TPN, with almost complete dietary rehabilitation 17 months after transplant. Our case reports suggest that multivisceral transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for patients affected by MMIHS with TPN-induced liver failure.