Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(1)2021 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35011866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyze the pre-operative and intra-operative variables that can condition urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), as well as continence rate recovery during a pelvic floor rehabilitation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 cases with UI after RP were prospectively examined. All cases were homogeneously treated by the same surgeon, using the same RP technique. A combination of biofeedback (BF) and pelvic floor electric stimulation (PFES) performed by the same clinician and using the same protocol was used. Clinical, pathologic and surgical variables were analyzed in terms of 24 h pad test results (pad weight and pad-free status). RESULTS: Prostate volume (PV) strongly varied from 24 to 127 cc (mean ± SD 46.39 ± 18.65 cc), and the baseline pad weight varied from 10 to 1500 cc (mean ± SD 354.29 ± 404.15 cc). PV strongly and positively correlated with the baseline pad weight (r = 0.4215; p = 0.0269) and inversely with the three-month pad weight (r = - 0.4763; p = 0.0213) and pad-free status (r =- 0.3010; p = 0.0429). The risk of a residual pad weight >10 g after the rehabilitative program significantly increased according to PV (p = 0.001) and the baseline pad weight (p = 0.002 and < 0.0001). In particular, PV > 40 cc and a baseline pad weight >400 g significantly (p = 0.010 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and independently predicted a 5.7 and a 35.4 times increase in the risk of a residual pad weight at the three-month follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective trial whose primary objective is to verify the possible predictors, such as PV, that are able to condition the response to a pelvic floor rehabilitation program for UI after RP.

2.
Anticancer Res ; 30(11): 4737-42, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21115933

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to verify and to compare in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, the effect of finasteride versus dutasteride therapy on chromogranin A (CgA) serum levels, as a marker of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomised study in which 60 consecutive men with clinical diagnosis of BPH were randomised to a 6-month period of finasteride 5 mg/day versus dutasteride 4 mg/day versus control (no therapy). Total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), testosterone and CgA were analysed at randomisation and thereafter at one-, three- and six-month intervals. RESULTS: In both Group A (finasteride) and Group B (dutasteride), but not in Group C (no therapy), a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in serum CgA levels was found at the three- and six-month intervals of therapy when compared with the start. Comparing the three groups, at three- and six-month intervals, serum CgA was significantly (p<0.05) higher in Group A and B than in Group C. At each interval, no significant (p>0.05) difference between Group A and B was found. CONCLUSION: In this population, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, with no difference between finasteride and dutasteride, produced a significant increase in serum CgA levels, probably related to NE activation.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Azasteroids/pharmacology , Chromogranin A/blood , Finasteride/pharmacology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Aged , Dutasteride , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...