Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Psychol Rep ; 97(1): 161-6, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16279320

ABSTRACT

According to the Indian Health Service, substance abuse and Type 2 diabetes are serious problems among Native Americans. To assess substance use in a medical setting, valid screening tests are needed so the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), a simple brief screen for excessive drinking, and the CAGE-adapted to Include Drugs (CAGE-AID) for identifying primary care patients with alcohol and drug disorders were given 50 Northern Plains American Indians with diabetes. Both are short, easy to administer, have good sensitivity and specificity, and can be easily incorporated into a medical history protocol or intake procedure. Reliability coefficients were above .90 and appeared to have sufficient concurrent and divergent validity indicated by moderate correlations with the General Well-being Schedule (rs=-.39 and -.36), the Family-Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, & Resolve (r =-.47 and -.36), and the Beck Depression Inventory-IT (r = .36 and .29).


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/ethnology , Indians, North American/psychology , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnology , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Female , Humans , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics as Topic , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology
2.
Diabetes Care ; 27(8): 1885-91, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15277412

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To define incidence and predictors of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA) in a diverse cohort of American Indians with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Strong Heart Study is a study of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in 13 American-Indian communities. Data on the presence/absence of amputations were collected at each of three serial examinations (1989-1992, 1993-1995, and 1997-1999) by direct examination of the lower extremity. The logistic regression model was used to quantify the relationship between risk of LEA and potential risk factors, including diabetes duration, HbA(1c), peripheral arterial disease, and renal function. RESULTS: Of the 1,974 individuals with diabetes and without prevalent LEA at baseline, 87 (4.4%) experienced an LEA during 8 years of follow-up, and a total of 157 anatomical sites were amputated among these individuals. Amputation of toes was most common, followed by below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. Age-adjusted odds of LEA were higher among individuals with unfavorable combinations of risk factors, such as albuminuria and elevated HbA(1c). Multivariable modeling indicated that male sex, renal dysfunction, high ankle-brachial index, longer duration of diabetes, less than a high school education, increasing systolic blood pressure, and HbA(1c) predicted LEA risk. CONCLUSIONS: The 8-year cumulative incidence of LEA in American Indians with diabetes is 4.4%, with marked differences in risk by sex, educational attainment, renal function, and glycemic control.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/physiopathology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
3.
Diabetes Care ; 27(6): 1286-93, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15161777

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in people with a lower-extremity amputation (LEA) attributable to diabetes and people without an LEA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Strong Heart Study is a study of CVD and its risk factors in 13 American-Indian communities. LEA was ascertained at baseline by direct examination of the legs and feet. Mortality surveillance is complete through 2000. RESULTS: Of 2,108 participants with diabetes at baseline, 134 participants (6.4%) had an LEA. Abnormal ankle-brachial index (53%), albuminuria (87%), and long diabetes duration (mean 19.8 years) were common among diabetic subjects with LEA. Mean diabetes duration among diabetic participants without LEA and in those with toe and below-the-knee amputations was 11.9, 18.6, and 21.1 years, respectively. During 8.7 (+/-2.9) years of follow-up, 102 of the participants with LEA (76%) died from all causes and 35 (26%) died from CVD. Of the 1,974 diabetic participants without LEA at baseline, 604 (31%) died from all causes and 206 (10%) died from CVD. The unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and CVD mortality in diabetic participants with LEA compared with those without were 4.0 and 4.1, respectively. Adjusting for known and suspected confounders, LEA persisted as a predictor of all-cause (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.7-2.9) and CVD mortality (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9). We observed a significant interaction between baseline LEA and sex on CVD mortality, with female sex conferring added risk of CVD mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LEA is a potent predictor of all-cause and CVD mortality in diabetic American Indians. The combination of female sex and LEA is associated with greater risk of CVD mortality than either factor alone.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Indians, North American , Leg , Amputation, Surgical/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
4.
Psychol Rep ; 93(1): 49-58, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14563026

ABSTRACT

The General Well-being Schedule is a brief indicator of subjective feelings of psychological well-being and distress. It is easy to administer, reliable, and valid, although its validity with American Indians has not been established. This study then assessed reliability, validity, and factor structure for a sample of 88 diabetic American Indians, who sought care for diabetes at an Indian Health Service hospital. Cronbach alpha was .89. A factor analysis indicated four dimensions. Adequate concurrent and divergent validity were noted in association with scores on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition, the depression scale on the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, and Family-Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, & Resolve. These results suggest that the General Well-being Schedule is a reliable and valid measure of general well-being for this population of American Indians.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Health Status , Indians, North American/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...