Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Biochem ; 87: 93-99, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33188774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Bovine alkaline phosphatase (BALP) mediated interference is a potential issue in the Beckman Access unconjugated estriol (uE3) assay. As the uE3 assay is a component of second trimester maternal serum screening characterizing this interference is essential for delivering accurate trisomy 18 and trisomy 21 risks. DESIGN AND METHODS: Residual serum samples (n = 517) were measured by two different lots of uE3 assay. Scavenger BALP (sBALP) was added to all samples to remove potential BALP dependent interference and assessed using both lots of uE3 reagent. RESULTS: BALP mediated interference was observed in similar frequency in both lots of reagent (~3%), although the patterns of positive and negative interference differed between the lots. Pretreatment with sBALP improved lot-to-lot comparison. The presence of BALP related interference was not related to the concentration of endogenous human alkaline phosphatase. The use of polyethylene glycol and sBALP treatment appeared to mitigate BALP mediated interference equally well, and resulted in concordance in measured uE3 concentrations between reagent lots. Additionally, heterophile antibody interference was observed in two samples affected with BALP interference, and the heterophile antibody interference was resolved by both PEG and heterophile antibody blocking reagent treatment, but not sBALP treatment. While the maternal screen numeric risk for affected samples changed, the risk classification changed from a negative to positive screen in two samples. CONCLUSIONS: Interference in the uE3 assay has the potential to affect maternal serum risk calculations in different reagent lots, and pretreatment of samples with scavenger BALP or PEG should be considered in cases of unexplained uE3 concentrations.


Subject(s)
Alkaline Phosphatase/chemistry , Biomarkers/blood , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Estriol/blood , Maternal Serum Screening Tests/standards , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Alkaline Phosphatase/metabolism , Animals , Cattle , Down Syndrome/blood , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second
2.
Clin Biochem ; 50(13-14): 768-771, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28322754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Verification of new reagent lots is a required laboratory task. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP26-A guideline provides a lot-to-lot verification protocol to detect significant changes in test performance. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of EP26-A with our laboratory reagent lot verification protocol. METHODS: Prospective evaluations for two reagent lots each for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (fT3), and thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) were performed. The laboratory's lot verification process included evaluation of 20 patient samples with the current and new lots and acceptability based on a predefined criteria. For EP26-A, method imprecision data and critical differences based on previously defined lot-to-lot consistency goals were used to define sample size requirements and rejection limits. RESULTS: EP26-A required the following number of samples: 23 for TSH, 17 for Tg, 33 for T4, 31 for T3, 48 for fT3, and 1 for TPOAb. Our current protocol and EP26-A were in agreement in 9 of the 12 (75%) paired verifications. Of the 3 discrepant verifications, Tg and TSH reagent lots were rejected by EP26-A due to significant differences at medical decision points; whereas TPOAb was rejected by the current laboratory protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The EP26-A protocol arrived at the same conclusions as our protocol in 75% of the evaluations and required more samples for 4 of the 6 analytes tested. Challenges associated with determining rejection limits and the need for increased sample sizes may be critical factors that limit the utility of EP26-A.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Indicators and Reagents/chemistry , Iodide Peroxidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Iron-Binding Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Thyroglobulin/blood , Thyrotropin/blood , Thyroxine/blood , Triiodothyronine/blood , Academic Medical Centers , Autoantigens , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Immunoassay/standards , Indicators and Reagents/standards , International Agencies , Minnesota , Quality Control , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Solubility , Time Factors , Triiodothyronine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...