Opioid-free anesthesia: a practical guide for teaching and implementation.

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) represents an innovative approach that prioritizes patient safety, reduces the risks associated with opioid use, and seeks to enhance recovery. Few descriptions regarding the practical and implementation aspects exist. This review serves as a practical guide on OFA teaching and application. We briefly discuss the historical use of opioids in anesthesia, side effects and their consequences. We discuss pedagogical avenues and challenges, as well as implementation of OFA in less experienced settings. Opioid use in anesthesia originally coexisted with OFA. During the last decades, the advent of multimodal analgesia has resulted in decreased opioid dosages both before and after surgery. Recently, OFA increased in popularity, supported by meta-analyses, due to reduced nausea and vomiting, with a potential, even if limited, impact on pain. OFA, as part of rational prescribing, may contribute to a more patient-centered approach. Different strategies for OFA implementation coexist. Educational aspects, leadership, guidelines, local guidance, and training are all important. We propose a framework for OFA implementation with concrete options, including patient preparation, choice of OFA pharmacological agents (according to type of surgery and patient), and postoperative care. Whilst opioids still have an important place in pain management, they have brought harms that we cannot ignore. Evidence for using opioid-sparing and OFA techniques continues to emerge and there is a need to personalize more approaches. In this review, we provide evidence-based, relatively simple methods that can be used in implementing and delivering OFA.

Systemic Hypertension and Postoperative Symptomatic Spinal Epidural Hematoma: A Scoping Review.

Postoperative symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma (PSSEH) is a serious complication of spinal surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. Studies suggest that hypertension is a risk factor for the development of PSSEH. The aim of this review was to evaluate the literature reporting associations between hypertension and PSSEH. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that investigated PSSEH and reported data on preoperative hypertension status and/or perioperative blood pressure (BP). Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion in the review. Observational data suggested that uncontrolled/untreated preoperative hypertension, extubation-related increases in systolic BP, and elevated postoperative systolic BP were associated with an increased risk of PSSEH. The overall quality of evidence was low because of the retrospective nature of the studies, heterogeneity, and lack of precision in reporting. Despite the limitations of the current evidence, our findings could be important in establishing preoperative BP targets for elective spine surgery and inform perioperative clinical decision-making, while allowing consideration of risk factors for PSSEH. Well-controlled studies are required to investigate further the relationship between BP and PSSEH.

Developing expert international consensus statements for opioid-sparing analgesia using the Delphi method.

INTRODUCTION: The management of postoperative pain in anaesthesia is evolving with a deeper understanding of associating multiple modalities and analgesic medications. However, the motivations and barriers regarding the adoption of opioid-sparing analgesia are not well known. METHODS: We designed a modified Delphi survey to explore the perspectives and opinions of expert panellists with regard to opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. 29 anaesthetists underwent an evolving three-round questionnaire to determine the level of agreement on certain aspects of multimodal analgesia, with the last round deciding if each statement was a priority. RESULTS: The results were aggregated and a consensus, defined as achievement of over 75% on the Likert scale, was reached for five out of eight statements. The panellists agreed there was a strong body of evidence supporting opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. However, there existed multiple barriers to widespread adoption, foremost the lack of training and education, as well as the reluctance to change existing practices. Practical issues such as cost effectiveness, increased workload, or the lack of supply of anaesthetic agents were not perceived to be as critical in preventing adoption. CONCLUSION: Thus, a focus on developing specific guidelines for multimodal analgesia and addressing gaps in education may improve the adoption of opioid-sparing analgesia.

Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method.

Introduction: The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been well established as an anaesthetic technique over the last few decades. Significant variation in practice exists however, and volatile agents are still commonly used. This study aims to determine the motivations and barriers for using TIVA over the use of volatile agents by analysing the opinion of several international anaesthetists with specific expertise or interests. Methods and participants: The Delphi method was used to gain the opinions of expert panellists with a range of anaesthetic subspecialty expertise. Twenty-nine panellists were invited to complete three survey rounds containing statements regarding the use of TIVA. Anonymised data were captured through the software REDCap and analysed for consensus and prioritisation across statements. Starting with 12 statements, strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Stability was assessed between rounds. Results: Strong consensus was achieved for four statements regarding considerations for the use of TIVA. These statements addressed whether TIVA is useful in paediatric anaesthesia, the importance of TIVA in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, its positive impact on the environment and effect on patient physiology, such as airway and haemodynamic control. Conclusions: Using the Delphi method, this international consensus showed that cost, lack of familiarity or training and the risk of delayed emergence are not considered obstacles to TIVA use. It appears, instead, that the primary motivations for its adoption are the impact of TIVA on patient experience, especially in paediatrics, and the benefit to the overall procedure outcome. The effect of TIVA on postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient physiology, as well as improving its availability in paediatrics were considered as priorities. We also identified areas where the debate remains open, generating new research questions on geographical variation and the potential impact of local availability of monitoring equipment.

Twelve tips for introducing simulation based assessment in the objective structured clinical examination.

The use of simulation as a tool for assessment in medical examinations is expanding. We describe 12 practical tips for the implementation of simulation based critical evaluation for the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The material in this article is a combination of personal experience and the available literature. Three themes are discussed encompassing simulation theory for the OSCE, practical features of simulation for the clinical examination and contingency planning. As clinical assessment evolves, the utility for simulation-based practice will advance alongside. An improved understanding of the processes for incorporating simulation into the OSCE will be of benefit to both the medical educator and the student.

Effect of chronic vagal nerve stimulation on interictal epileptiform discharges.

We evaluated the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in 32 epileptic patients (18 females; 14 males) with an average age of 42.2+/-11.4 years, all of whom had been suffering from epilepsy for an average of 29.2+/-14.5 years. All of the patients had received VNS for 5 years. The first EEG was performed prior to the initiation of stimulation; the second EEG was performed at the 5-year follow-up visit. The duration of each EEG was 30 min. We compared these two EEGs in terms of the number of IEDs present in each patient and correlated them to other variables. The average total number of IEDs during EEG and the total number of seconds in which IEDs were present decreased significantly after 5 years of stimulation from 97.3+/-106.9 resp. 80.6+/-86.1 to 49.4+/-94.0 resp. 37.8+/-65.0. Although there was no positive correlation between the reduction of IEDs and the percent of seizure reduction, we found a greater decrease of IEDs in patients who responded to VNS in comparison to those who did not. The decrease of IEDs was more pronounced in patients suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy than in patients suffering from extratemporal epilepsy. No other significant correlations were found. VNS reduced IEDs in patients chronically simulated for epilepsy. The reduction of IEDs was greater in patients who responded to VNS and in patients suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy.