Impact of Insurance Type on Access to Pediatric Surgical Care.

Background: This study aimed to measure the impact of insurance type on access to pediatric surgical care, clinical and surgical scheduling decisions, provider-driven cancelations, and missed care opportunities (MCOs). We hypothesize that patients with public health insurance experience longer scheduling delays and more frequently canceled surgical appointments compared with patients with private health insurance. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent a surgical procedure within the plastic and oral surgery department at our institution in 2019. Propensity score matching and linear regressions were used to estimate the effect of insurance type on hospital scheduling and patient access outcomes while controlling for procedure type and sex. Results: A total of 457 patients were included in the demographic and clinical characteristics analyses; 354 were included in propensity score matching analyses. No significant differences in the number of days between scheduling and occurrence of initial consultation or number of clinic cancelations were observed between insurance groups (P > 0.05). However, patients with public insurance had a 7.4 times higher hospital MCO rate (95% CI [5.2-9.7]; P < 0.001) and 4.7 times the number of clinic MCOs (P = 0.007). Conclusions: No significant differences were found between insurance groups in timely access to surgical treatment or cancelations. Patients with public insurance had more MCOs than patients with private insurance. Future research should investigate how to remove barriers that impact access to care for marginalized patients.

A Comparison of Parent Reports, the Mental Synthesis Evaluation Checklist (MSEC) and the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), with the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS).

This study compares two parent reports, the Mental Synthesis Evaluation Checklist (MSEC) and the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), with the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). The ATEC consists of four subscales, as follows: (1) expressive language, (2) sociability, (3) sensory awareness, and (4) health. The MSEC is complementary to the ATEC in measuring complex language comprehension. The parents of 143 autistic children, from 2 to 22 years of age (mean 6.7 ± 5.1 years), completed the MSEC and the ATEC questionnaires and a clinician assessed their CARS score. The CARS score correlated strongly with all parent reports, the complex language comprehension MSEC (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), expressive language (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001), sociability (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001), sensory awareness (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001), and health (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001), as well as the total ATEC score (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). The strongest correlation was between the CARS score and the composite of all five parent-reported scores (total ATEC + MSEC, r = 0.77, p < 0.0001). These results suggest a high fidelity of the MSEC and ATEC parent reports and especially of their composite score, total ATEC + MSEC.

Validation of the Short-Form 36 for Adolescents Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty.

Health-related quality of life improvements after reduction mammaplasty have been reported by patients. Although instruments exist for adults, a validated outcomes survey is not available for adolescents. This study aims to validate the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for adolescents undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Methods: Patients aged 12-21 years were prospectively recruited between 2008 and 2021 to unaffected or macromastia cohorts. Patients completed four baseline surveys: SF-36, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Breast-related Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating Attitudes Test. Surveys were repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (macromastia cohort), and at 6 and 12 months from baseline (unaffected cohort). Content, construct, and longitudinal validity were assessed. Results: A total of 258 patients with macromastia (median age: 17.5 years), and 128 unaffected patients (median age: 17.0 years) were included. Content validity was established, and construct validity was fulfilled: internal consistency was confirmed for all domains (Cronbach alpha >0.7); convergent validity was satisfied through expected correlations between the SF-36 and Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Breast-related Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating Attitudes Test, and known-groups validity was established through significantly lower mean scores in all SF-36 domains in the macromastia cohort compared with unaffected patients. Longitudinal validity was established by significant improvements in domain scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months postoperatively in patients with macromastia (P < 0.05, all). Conclusions: The SF-36 is a valid instrument for adolescents undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Although other instruments have been used for older patients, we recommend the SF-36 when assessing health-related quality of life changes in younger populations.

Trends in Outcomes and Variation by Race and Ethnicity in Pediatric Plastic Surgery in the United States.

The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Pediatric Data manages a multicenter dataset for monitoring outcomes in pediatric surgical care. We explored trends in outcomes in the most frequently sampled current procedural terminology codes related to craniofacial and cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgical procedures over a 7-year period. Methods: We used National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Pediatric Data on 28,147 pediatric patients who underwent plastic surgical procedures between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. Eighteen relevant current procedural terminology codes were selected and sorted into two procedure groups: CLP and craniofacial. For each group, we explored trends in readmission, reoperation, extended length of stay, morbidity, and racial and ethnic variation. Results: The proportion of readmissions following CLP repair saw a significant reduction per year (from 3.6% to 1.7%). African American or Black CLP patients had significantly higher rates of readmission and extended length of stay when compared to the overall cohort. Asian and White CLP patients had significantly lower rates of experiencing an extended length of stay. For craniofacial cases, extended length of stay decreased significantly per year (from 7.7% to 2.8%). One possible driver of this change was a decrease in transfusion rates during the study period from 59% to 47%. Conclusions: Pediatric CLP and craniofacial cases saw significant improvements in safety, as indicated by reductions in readmission and extended length of stay. Given the racial differences observed, especially among CLP patients, continued research to identify and address systems of racism in health care remains a priority.

Patient Experience with Virtual Preoperative Consultations in Pediatric Surgical Specialties.

BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the comparative effectiveness of virtual visits for preoperative evaluation and surgical decision-making in three pediatric surgical subspecialties. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical procedures in the departments of Urology, Ophthalmology, and Plastic and Oral Surgery at a tertiary care pediatric hospital over a one-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Patients were assigned to one of three clinical pathways based on their preoperative visit(s): only in-person visit(s) (IP), a combination of in-person and virtual visit(s) (IP/VV), and only virtual visit(s) (VV). Demographics, procedure information, and patient experience survey results were collected. We then assessed variations in procedure types and patient experience scores in these three patient groups. RESULTS: There were 431 patients who completed the modified patient experience survey. The most common procedures were circumcision (17%), excision of lesion (16%), and strabismus repair (11%). Survey results were positive, with 90% of participants rating that they would recommend the service to others. No significant differences were found among groups in their demographics, overall care rating, and duration between preoperative clinic visit and procedure. Post-hoc power analysis indicated 87% power to detect a 10% difference in survey ratings between IP and VV cases, confirming non-inferiority in patient satisfaction for virtual preoperative visits. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of preoperative virtual visits in three pediatric surgical subspecialties as measured by patient experience scores. Additional studies with more granular scope are necessary to further elucidate telemedicine's safety and efficacy for select diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Combinatorial Language parent-report Scores Differ Significantly Between Typically Developing Children and Those with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Prefrontal synthesis (PFS) is a component of constructive imagination. It is defined as the process of mentally juxtaposing objects into novel combinations. For example, to comprehend the instruction "put the cat under the dog and above the monkey," it is necessary to use PFS in order to correctly determine the spatial arrangement of the cat, dog, and monkey with relation to one another. The acquisition of PFS hinges on the use of combinatorial language during early childhood development. Accordingly, children with developmental delays exhibit a deficit in PFS, and frequent assessments are recommended for such individuals. In 2018, we developed the Mental Synthesis Evaluation Checklist (MSEC), a parent-reported evaluation designed to assess PFS and combinatorial language comprehension. In this manuscript we use MSEC to identify differences in combinatorial language acquisition between ASD (N = 29,138) and neurotypical (N = 111) children. Results emphasize the utility of the MSEC in distinguishing language deficits in ASD from typical development as early as 2 years of age (p < 0.0001).

The Family Impact of a Robin Sequence Prenatal Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of prenatal diagnosis of Robin sequence (RS) on parental experience during gestation and early infancy. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. An online survey was administered via email to 44 parents representing 34 unique patients with RS. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of children diagnosed with RS and who received mandibular distraction at our tertiary care children's hospital. Participants were separated by the timing of RS diagnosis into prenatal and control postnatal groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effects of timing of diagnosis on parents' preparation, caregiver support, education about the condition, stress, and overall mental health. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 44 parents representing 34 unique patients (50% response rate): prenatal, n = 17; postnatal, n = 27. Prenatal diagnosis improved parents' satisfaction regarding time to prepare for treatment (P = .001), stress of uncertainty about their child's health (P = .018), and stress about the operation(s) their child would need (P = .001). Both the prenatal (82%) and postnatal (78%) groups reported a negative impact on mental health based on diagnosis timing. All parents in the prenatal group preferred having received a prenatal diagnosis and the majority of the postnatal group (85%) would have preferred to have received the diagnosis prenatally. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal diagnosis of RS provided tangible benefits for parents by allowing them to mentally prepare, make plans for delivery and treatment, and become educated about the condition. Parents in both groups reported a negative impact on their mental health based on diagnosis timing and the majority of parents consistently preferred prenatal diagnosis.

Boston cognitive assessment (BOCA) - a comprehensive self-administered smartphone- and computer-based at-home test for longitudinal tracking of cognitive performance.

Longitudinal cognitive testing is essential for developing novel preventive interventions for dementia and Alzheimer's disease; however, the few available tools have significant practice effect and depend on an external evaluator. We developed a self-administered 10-min at-home test intended for longitudinal cognitive monitoring, Boston Cognitive Assessment or BOCA. The goal of this project was to validate BOCA. BOCA uses randomly selected non-repeating tasks to minimize practice effects. BOCA evaluates eight cognitive domains: 1) Memory/Immediate Recall, 2) Combinatorial Language Comprehension/Prefrontal Synthesis, 3) Visuospatial Reasoning/Mental rotation, 4) Executive function/Clock Test, 5) Attention, 6) Mental math, 7) Orientation, and 8) Memory/Delayed Recall. BOCA was administered to patients with cognitive impairment (n = 50) and age- and education-matched controls (n = 50). Test scores were significantly different between patients and controls (p < 0.001) suggesting good discriminative ability. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.87 implying good internal consistency. BOCA demonstrated strong correlation with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (R = 0.90, p < 0.001). The study revealed strong (R = 0.94, p < 0.001) test-retest reliability of the total BOCA score one week after participants' initial administration. The practice effect tested by daily BOCA administration over 10 days was insignificant (ß = 0.03, p = 0.68). The effect of the screen size tested by BOCA administration on a large computer screen and re-administration of the BOCA to the same participant on a smartphone was insignificant (ß = 0.82, p = 0.17; positive ß indicates greater score on a smartphone). BOCA has the potential to reduce the cost and improve the quality of longitudinal cognitive tracking essential for testing novel interventions designed to reduce or reverse cognitive aging. BOCA is available online gratis at www.bocatest.org .