Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 22(4): 103-109, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37782621

ABSTRACT

Clinical pathways are useful tools for conveying and reinforcing best practices to standardize care and optimize patient outcomes across myriad conditions. The NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System has utilized a clinical chest pain pathway for more than 20 years to facilitate the timely recognition and management of patients presenting with chest pain syndromes and acute coronary syndromes. This chest pain pathway is regularly updated by an expanding group of key stakeholders, which has extended from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center to encompass the entire regional healthcare system, which includes 8 hospitals. In this 2023 update of the NewYork-Presbyterian clinical chest pain pathway, we present the key changes to the healthcare system-wide clinical chest pain pathway.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Critical Pathways , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Chest Pain/therapy , Delivery of Health Care
2.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(2): e0605, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35156046

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The utility and risks to providers of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19 patients have been questioned. Additionally, there are discrepancies in reported COVID-19 in-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates. We describe outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest in two COVID-19 patient cohorts. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York, NY. PATIENTS: Those admitted with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, as well as between March 1, 2021, and May 31, 2021, who received resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 103 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who were resuscitated after in-hospital cardiac arrest in spring 2020, most self-identified as Hispanic/Latino or African American, 35 (34.0%) had return of spontaneous circulation for at least 20 minutes, and 15 (14.6%) survived to 30 days post-arrest. Compared with nonsurvivors, 30-day survivors experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest later (day 22 vs day 7; p = 0.008) and were more likely to have had an acute respiratory event preceding in-hospital cardiac arrest (93.3% vs 27.3%; p < 0.001). Among 30-day survivors, 11 (73.3%) survived to hospital discharge, at which point 8 (72.7%) had Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1 or 2. Among 26 COVID-19 patients resuscitated after in-hospital cardiac arrest in spring 2021, 15 (57.7%) had return of spontaneous circulation for at least 20 minutes, 3 (11.5%) survived to 30 days post in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 2 (7.7%) survived to hospital discharge, both with Cerebral Performance Category scores of 2 or less. Those who survived to 30 days post in-hospital cardiac arrest were younger (46.3 vs 67.8; p = 0.03), but otherwise there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest had low survival rates. Our findings additionally show return of spontaneous circulation rates in these patients may be impacted by hospital strain and that patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest preceded by acute respiratory events might be more likely to survive to 30 days, suggesting Advanced Cardiac Life Support efforts may be more successful in this subpopulation.

3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(4): 508-516.e1, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whether to proceed with a medical intervention over the objection of a patient who lacks capacity is a common problem facing practitioners. Despite this, there is a notable gap in the literature describing how to proceed in such situations in an ethically rigorous and consistent fashion. We elaborate on the practical application of the 2018 Rubin and Prager 7-question algorithm for ethics consultations about treatment over objection and we describe the impact of each of the 7 questions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively review a series of consultations at Columbia University Irving Medical Center between April 2017 and May 2020 for treatment over objection in adult patients determined to lack capacity. Outcomes about the final ethics recommendation and the assessment of each of the 7 questions are reported. The statistical analysis was designed to determine which of the 7 questions in the algorithm were most predictive of the final ethics recommendation. RESULTS: In our series, there was an ethics recommendation to proceed over the objection of a patient in 63% of consultations. Although all 7 questions were considered to be important to the ethical analysis of a patient's situation, the presence of logistical barriers to treatment and the imminence of harm to a patient without treatment emerged as the most significant drivers of the recommendation of whether to proceed over objection or not. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of treatment over objection in a patient lacking capacity are frequently encountered problems that require a careful balance of patient autonomy and a physician's duty of beneficence. The application of the Rubin and Prager 7-question algorithm reliably guides a care team through such a complex ethical dilemma.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Medical , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Treatment Refusal/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Clin Ethics ; 31(3): 212-218, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773403

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic swept through New York City swiftly and with devastating effect. The crisis put enormous pressure on all hospital services, including the clinical ethics consultation team. This report describes the recent experience of the ethics consultants and Columbia University Irving Medical Center during the COVID-19 surge and compares the case load and characteristics to the corresponding period in 2019. By reporting this experience, we hope to supplement the growing body of COVID-19 scientific literature and provide details of the human toll the virus took on our hospitals and communities. We also aim to highlight the role of the clinical ethics consultant as well as areas of policy and law that may need to be addressed in order to be better prepared for a future public health crisis.


Subject(s)
Ethics Consultation , Pandemics/ethics , Academic Medical Centers , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 18(4): 167-175, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725507

ABSTRACT

Clinical pathways reinforce best practices and help healthcare institutions standardize care delivery. The NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center has used such a pathway for the management of patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndromes for almost 2 decades. A multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders serially updates the algorithm according to new data and recently published guidelines. Herein, we present the 2019 version of the clinical pathway. We explain the rationale for changes to the algorithm and describe our experience expanding the pathway to all the 8 affiliated institutions within the NewYork Presbyterian healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Chest Pain/therapy , Critical Pathways , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angina, Unstable/diagnosis , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Coronary Angiography , Electrocardiography , Heparin/therapeutic use , Humans , New York City , Nitroglycerin/therapeutic use , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Patient Transfer , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Triage , Troponin I/blood , Troponin T/blood , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 111(8): 1192-7, 2013 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23351460

ABSTRACT

The bilirubin level has been associated with worse outcomes, but it has not been studied as a predictor for the mode of death in patients with systolic heart failure. The Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Evaluation Study (PRAISE) cohort (including New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, n = 1,135) was analyzed, divided by bilirubin level: ≤0.6 mg/dl, group 1; >0.6 to 1.2 mg/dl, group 2; and >1.2 mg/dl, group 3. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association of bilirubin with the risk of sudden or pump failure death. Total bilirubin was entered as a base 2 log-transformed variable (log2 bilirubin), indicating doubling of the bilirubin level corresponding to each increase in variable value. The higher bilirubin groups had a lower ejection fraction (range 19% to 21%), sodium (range 138 to 139 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (range 111 to 120 mm Hg), a greater heart rate (range 79 to 81 beats/min), and greater diuretic dosages (range 86 to 110 furosemide-equivalent total daily dose in mg). The overall survival rates declined with increasing bilirubin (24.3, 31.3, and 44.3 deaths per 100 person-years, respectively, for groups 1, 2, and 3). Although a positive relation was seen between log2 bilirubin and both pump failure risk and sudden death risk, the relation in multivariate modeling was significant only for pump failure mortality (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.82, p = 0.0004), not for sudden death mortality (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.49, p = 0.08). In conclusion, an increasing bilirubin level was significantly associated with the risk of pump failure death but not for sudden death in patients with severe systolic heart failure.


Subject(s)
Bilirubin/blood , Heart Failure, Systolic/mortality , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Cause of Death , Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Female , Heart Failure, Systolic/blood , Heart Failure, Systolic/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
7.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 10(1): 9-16, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21562369

ABSTRACT

In 2008, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which includes primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2008, there have been changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. In particular, recent data on the novel antiplatelet agent prasugrel, dosing of clopidogrel after PCI, and interactions with clopidogrel and other medicines and substrates, which can lead to decreased platelet response to clopidogrel, have led us to update our ACS clinical pathway. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI, and provide rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be regularly updated and revised by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials to ensure optimal clinical care.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Chest Pain/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
8.
Am Heart J ; 160(5): 928-33, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21095282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have not extensively examined the association of hyperuricemia and adverse outcomes in systolic heart failure (HF) in relation to xanthine oxidase inhibitor therapy. METHODS: The Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation study included New York Heart Association class IIIB or IV patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30%. For analysis, the population was divided into uric acid quartiles among nonallopurinol users (2.2-7.1, >7.1-8.6, >8.6-10.4, >10.4 mg/dL) and those using allopurinol. Multivariate Cox regression modeling was performed to identify predictors of mortality. Uric acid quartile and allopurinol groups were referenced to the lowest uric acid quartile. RESULTS: A total of 1,152 patients were included. In general, patients in the allopurinol group and in the highest uric acid quartile had indicators of more severe HF, including worse renal function and greater proportion of New York Heart Association class IV patients, and greater diuretic use. The allopurinol group and highest uric acid quartile had the highest total mortality (41.7 and 42.4 per 100 person-years, respectively) and combined morbidity/mortality (45.6 and 51.0 per 100 person-years, respectively). Allopurinol use and highest uric acid quartile were independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-2.23, P = .001 and HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.72, P = .01, respectively) and combined morbidity/mortality (uric acid quartile 4 vs 1: HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.66, P = .02; allopurinol use: HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.99, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Elevated uric acid level was independently associated with mortality in patients with severe systolic HF, even when accounting for allopurinol use.


Subject(s)
Allopurinol/administration & dosage , Heart Failure, Systolic/blood , Uric Acid/blood , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure, Systolic/drug therapy , Heart Failure, Systolic/epidemiology , Humans , Hyperuricemia/blood , Hyperuricemia/complications , Hyperuricemia/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
11.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 7(4): 211-22, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19050417

ABSTRACT

In 2003, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which was primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2003, there have been numerous changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI and provide a rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be consistently updated and revises by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials in order to maintain clinical relevance.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Chest Pain/therapy , Critical Pathways/trends , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Angina, Unstable/diagnosis , Angina, Unstable/mortality , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/mortality , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Pathways/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States
12.
Am Heart J ; 144(1): 31-8, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12094185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), diuretic requirements increase as the disease progresses. Because diuretic resistance can be overcome with escalating doses, the evaluation of CHF severity and prognosis may be incomplete without considering the intensity of therapy. METHODS: The prognostic importance of diuretic resistance (as evidenced by a high-dose requirement) was retrospectively evaluated in 1153 patients with advanced CHF who were enrolled in the Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation (PRAISE). The relation of loop diuretic and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor doses (defined by their median values) and other baseline characteristics to total and cause-specific mortality was determined by proportion hazards regression. RESULTS: High diuretic doses were independently associated with mortality, sudden death, and pump failure death (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] 1.37 [P =.004], 1.39 [P =.042], and 1.51 [P =.034], respectively). Use of metolazone was an independent predictor of total mortality (adjusted HR = 1.37, P =.016) but not of cause-specific mortality. Low angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dose was an independent predictor of pump failure death (adjusted HR = 2.21, P =.0005). Unadjusted mortality risks of congestion and its treatment were additive and comparable to those of established risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The independent association of high diuretic doses with mortality suggests that diuretic resistance should be considered an indicator of prognosis in patients with chronic CHF. These retrospective observations do not establish harm or rule out a long-term benefit of diuretics in CHF, because selection bias may entirely explain the relation of prescribed therapy to death.


Subject(s)
Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Diuretics/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Chronic Disease , Drug Resistance , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...