Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 60(249): 439-443, 2022 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633244

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Surgical site infection is defined by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention as a wound infection that occurs within 30 days of an operative procedure or within a year if an implant is left in place and the infection is thought to be secondary to surgery. It occupies 20% to 39% of all the infections acquired in hospitals. The aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of postoperative surgical site infections in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study on a total of 384 post-operative patients of abdominal surgery was conducted in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care centre from August 1, 2020 to July 30, 2021 with ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 267). Convenience sampling was done. Post-operative patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.0. Point estimate was done at a 95% Confidence Interval along with frequency and percentages for binary data and mean with standard deviation for continuous data. Results: Among 384 patients, the prevalence of surgical site infection was found to be 65 (16.92%) (13.15-20.65 at a 95% Confidence Interval). The patients had a mean age of 42.06±21.92 years. Conclusions: The prevalence of surgical site infection was higher in our study in comparison to other similar studies conducted in similar settings. Keywords: cross-sectional studies; prevalence; surgical wound infection.


Subject(s)
Surgical Wound Infection , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prevalence , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 94: 107100, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35468381

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Penile strangulation is one of the rarest clinical findings. So, we aimed to present the clinical case of two cases that we encountered at our institute. PRESENTATION OF CASES: Case 1. A 26-year-male with bipolar disorder presented to emergency room with complaints of metallic ring entrapment in the penis for 4 days. A gold-plated metallic ring measuring 1 × 0.25 cm was found encircling the coronal sulcus along with foul-smelling pus and slough underneath as a result of necrosis of the skin. Jumbo cutter was used to cut the ring. Loose sutures were applied to the injured part with debridement. CASE 2: A 66-year-old man presented to emergency with complaints of penile swelling and poor urinary stream for the last 2 days. Local examination showed a plastic ring of water bottle seen stuck at the root of penis. Distal penis was edematous with multiple areas of skin discoloration and petechia. The ring was cut with simple surgical scissor. DISCUSSION: This clinically emergency condition may lead to wide range of vascular and mechanical injuries if the treatment is delayed. Plastic rings can be easily cut out whilst metallic objects which are thick and hard are difficult to remove. Pliers' application or use of jumbo cutter as in one of our cases is beneficial for prompt release of edematous pressure and salvage of the penis. CONCLUSION: Penile strangulation due to foreign body is a rare clinically emergency condition. Urgent intervention is necessary to remove the object causing constriction along the penis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...