Specific and Generic Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles with Magnetic Beads.

This chapter covers magnetic bead-based isolation and analysis of the smallest members of extracellular vesicles (EVs), the exosomes (30-150 nm), generally regarded to originate from the multivesicular bodies (MVBs). Also included, are descriptions of how to prepare samples prior to isolations. The magnetic bead-based isolation workflow is dramatically shortened both by omitting the pre-enrichment step and providing an option for a very short capture time. Three direct exosome isolation strategies are described: (1) "Specific and Direct," (2) "Semi Generic and Direct" and (3) "Generic and Direct" as well as exosome release from the magnetic beads. Detailed description of downstream exosome analysis is included covering flow cytometry, Western blot and electron microscopy. Finally, a description of exosome isolation from more complex starting material including urine and serum/plasma is discussed.

Size and concentration analyses of extracellular vesicles by nanoparticle tracking analysis: a variation study.

Current methods for characterisation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) need further standardisation in order to obtain an acceptable level of data comparability. Size and concentration of EVs can be determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). However, both the heterogeneity of EVs and the choice of instrument settings may cause an appreciable analytical variation. Intra-assay (within-day, n = 6) and inter-assay (day-to-day, n = 6) variations (coefficient of variation, % CV) of different preparations of EVs and artificial vesicles or beads were determined using two NanoSight NS500 instruments, located at different laboratories. All analyses were performed by the same operator. The effect of applying identical software settings or instrument-optimised settings for each sample type and instrument was also evaluated. Finally, the impact of different operators and the use of two different software versions were investigated. The intra-assay CVs were 1-12% for both EVs and artificial samples, measured on the same instrument. The overall day-to-day variation was similar for both instruments, ranging from 2% to 25%. However, significantly different results were observed between the two instruments using identical software settings. The effect of applying instrument-optimised settings reduced the mismatch between the instruments, resulting in little to no significant divergences. The impact of using different operators and software versions when analysing silica microspheres and microvesicles from monocytes using instrument-optimised settings on the same instrument did not contribute to significant variation compared to the overall day-to-day variation of one operator. Performance differences between two similar NTA instruments may display significant divergences in size and concentration measurements when analysing EVs, depending on applied instrument settings and technical conditions. The importance of developing a streamlined and standardised execution of analysis, as well as monitoring longitudinal variation parameters on both biological and synthetic samples, should be highlighted.

Magnetic bead-based isolation of exosomes.

Exosomes are here defined as extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the approximate size range of 30-100 nm in diameter, and are observed in most body fluids containing typical exosomal markers such as CD9, CD63, and CD81. Potential subpopulations of exosomes can be captured by targeting these markers using magnetic beads. Magnetic beads are versatile tools for exosome isolation and downstream analysis. Here, we describe the workflow of immuno magnetic isolation and analysis of exosomes by flow cytometry, Western immunoblotting, and electron microscopy.

Expression of B-cell surface antigens in subpopulations of exosomes released from B-cell lymphoma cells.

PURPOSE: Exosomes are small (30- to 100-nm) vesicles secreted by all cell types in culture and found in most body fluids. A mean of 1 mL of blood serum, derived from healthy donors, contains approximately 10(12) exosomes. Depending on the disease, the number of exosomes can fluctuate. Concentration of exosomes in the bloodstream and all other body fluids is extremely high. Several B-cell surface antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD24, CD37, CD40, and HLA-DR) and the common leukocyte antigen CD45 are interesting in terms of immunotherapy of hematologic malignant neoplasms. The established standard for exosome isolation is ultracentrifugation. However, this method cannot discriminate between exosome subpopulations and other nanovesicles. The main purpose of this study was to characterize CD81(+) and CD63(+) subpopulations of exosomes in terms of these surface markers after release from various types of B-cell lymphoma cell lines using an easy and reliable method of immunomagnetic separation. METHODS: Western blotting, flow cytometry, and electron microscopy were used to compare the total preenriched extracellular vesicle (EV) pool to each fraction of vesicles after specific isolation, using magnetic beads conjugated with antibodies raised against the exosome markers CD63 and CD81. FINDINGS: Magnetic bead-based isolation is a convenient method to study and compare subpopulations of exosomes released from B-cell lymphoma cells. The data indicated that the specifically isolated vesicles differed from the total preenriched EV pool. CD19, CD20, CD24, CD37, and HLA-DR, but not CD22, CD23, CD40, and CD45, are expressed on exosomes from B-cell lymphoma cell lines with large heterogeneity among the different B-cell lymphoma cell lines. Interestingly, these B-cell lymphoma-derived EVs are able to rescue lymphoma cells from rituximab-induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity. IMPLICATIONS: Distribution of exosomes that contain CD19, CD20, CD24, CD37, and HLA-DR may intercept immunotherapy directed against these antigens, which is important to be aware of for optimal treatment. The use of an immunomagnetic separation platform enables easy isolation and characterization of exosome subpopulations for further studies of the exosome biology to understand the potential for therapeutic and diagnostic use.

Methods for the extraction and RNA profiling of exosomes.

AIM: To develop protocols for isolation of exosomes and characterization of their RNA content. METHODS: Exosomes were extracted from HeLa cell culture media and human blood serum using the Total exosome isolation (from cell culture media) reagent, and Total exosome isolation (from serum) reagent respectively. Identity and purity of the exosomes was confirmed by Nanosight(®) analysis, electron microscopy, and Western blots for CD63 marker. Exosomal RNA cargo was recovered with the Total exosome RNA and protein isolation kit. Finally, RNA was profiled using Bioanalyzer and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) methodology. RESULTS: Here we describe a novel approach for robust and scalable isolation of exosomes from cell culture media and serum, with subsequent isolation and analysis of RNA residing within these vesicles. The isolation procedure is completed in a fraction of the time, compared to the current standard protocols utilizing ultracentrifugation, and allows to recover fully intact exosomes in higher yields. Exosomes were found to contain a very diverse RNA cargo, primarily short sequences 20-200 nt (such as miRNA and fragments of mRNA), however longer RNA species were detected as well, including full-length 18S and 28S rRNA. CONCLUSION: We have successfully developed a set of reagents and a workflow allowing fast and efficient extraction of exosomes, followed by isolation of RNA and its analysis by qRT-PCR and other techniques.

Cell isolation and expansion using Dynabeads.

This chapter describes the use of Dynabeads for cell isolation and expansion. Dynabeads are uniform polystyrene spherical beads that have been made magnetisable and superparamagnetic, meaning they are only magnetic in a magnetic field. Due to this property, the beads can easily be resuspended when the magnetic field is removed. The invention of Dynabeads made, by Professor John Ugelstad, has revolutionized the separation of many biological materials. For example, the attachment of target-specific antibodies to the surface of the beads allows capture and isolation of intact cells directly from a complex suspension such as blood. This is all accomplished under the influence of a simple magnetic field without the need for column separation techniques or centrifugation. In general, magnetic beads coated with specific antibodies can be used either for isolation or depletion of various cell types. Positive or negative cell isolation can be performed depending on the nature of the starting sample, the cell surface markers and the downstream application in question. Positive cell isolation is the method of choice for unprocessed samples, such as whole blood, and for downstream molecular applications. Positive cell isolation can also be used for any downstream application after detachment and removal of the beads. Negative cell isolation is the method of choice when it is critical that cells of interest remain untouched, i.e., no antibodies have been bound to any cell surface markers on the cells of interest. Some cell populations can only be defined by multiple cell surface markers. Such populations of cells can be isolated by the combination of negative and positive cell isolation. By coupling Dynabeads with antibodies directed against cell surface activation molecules, the beads can be used both for isolation and expansion of the cells. Dynabeads are currently used in two major clinical applications: 1) In the Isolex 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System for CD34 Stem Cell Isolation--2) For ex vivo T cell isolation and expansion using Dynabeads ClinExVivo CD3/CD28 for clinical trials in novel adoptive immunotherapy.