Tumor bed boost omission after negative re-excision in breast-conservation treatment.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the necessity of a tumor bed boost after whole-breast radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and negative re-excision. METHODS: Of patients treated at the Virginia Commonwealth and Tufts Universities with breast-conservation therapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1983 and 1999, 205 required re-excision of the tumor cavity to obtain clear margins and were found to be without residual disease. Adjuvant conventionally fractionated whole-breast radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The tumor bed boost was omitted. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 98 months (range, 6-229 months). The tumor histological diagnosis was primarily infiltrating ductal carcinoma (183 cases; 89%). Nodal involvement was documented in 49 cases (24%). There were four documented recurrences at the tumor bed site. Five in-breast recurrences were documented to be in a location removed from the tumor bed. The overall Kaplan-Meier 15-year in-breast control rate was 92.4%, and the freedom from true recurrence rate was 97.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the concept that postlumpectomy radiotherapy can be tailored according to the degree of surgical resection. There is an easily identifiable subgroup of patients who can avoid a tumor bed boost, thus resulting in a reduced treatment time and improved cosmesis, while maintaining local control rates that approach 100%. The data suggest that in patients who undergo a negative re-excision, treatment with whole-breast radiotherapy to 50 Gy is a sufficient dose to maximally reduce the risk of local recurrence.

Loss of expression of the putative tumor suppressor NES1 gene in biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ predicts for invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery.

PURPOSE: The loss of expression of NES1, a novel putative tumor suppressor gene, is an early marker of breast tumorigenesis. NES1 is expressed in normal breast tissue and ductal hyperplasia but is absent or markedly diminished in invasive cancer. In cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), NES1 expression has been shown previously to be present in approximately 50% of specimens. This study examined the expression level of NES1 in diagnostic biopsy samples found to contain pure DCIS. These data were then correlated with the pathologic findings found at definitive local surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-nine cases with initial biopsy showing DCIS without invasive carcinoma followed by subsequent reexcision were discovered and archived. Formalin-fixed tissue specimens were obtained for analysis. Each biopsy specimen was subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining and reviewed by two pathologists to confirm the diagnosis of pure DCIS. NES1 cDNA (1069 bp), including 238 bp of 5' and 3' untranslated region and the entire protein-coding region, was cloned into a vector. To generate the antisense and sense RNA probes, the plasmid was linearized and the transcription reaction was carried out with polymerases T7 and T3, respectively. The detection of in situ hybridization probes was performed using an mRNAlocator-Biotin Kit. Staining was characterized as negative (0/1+) or positive (2+/3+). Subsequent to an initial biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, all cases had a definitive surgical procedure. Detailed sectioning of the resultant tissue was performed and subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining to determine the presence or absence of invasive carcinoma. RESULTS: The initial diagnostic biopsy specimens showed that 17 of 17 high-grade, 3 of 7 intermediate-grade, and 3 of 5 low-grade DCIS specimens were negative for NES1 expression. Of the 6 cases of DCIS found to be positive for NES1 expression, none (0%) were subsequently found to have invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery. In contrast, the loss of NES1 expression in the initial diagnostic biopsy was associated with a 40% incidence of invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery. Additional stratification by nuclear grade showed invasive carcinoma in 5 (83%) of 6 NES1-negative, low- to intermediate-grade DCIS (p

Limited resection for non-small cell lung cancer: observed local control with implantation of I-125 brachytherapy seeds.

BACKGROUND: Limited resection for lung cancer has been associated with a relatively high incidence of local recurrence. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of implanting radioactive iodine-125 (125I) seeds along the resection margin in these patients. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with lung cancer who were not candidates for lobectomy or pneumonectomy underwent a limited resection of 35 primary non-small cell lung cancers. 125I brachytherapy seeds were implanted along the resection margin to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and sites of recurrence were documented. Follow-up ranged from 20 to 98 months (median, 51 months). RESULTS: The 5-year survival was 47% for all patients. For patients with T1N0 tumors, it was 67%, and for patients with T2N0 tumors, it was 39%. However, the cancer-specific survivals were 77% and 53% for patients with T1N0 and T2N0 tumors, respectfully. Ten patients experienced recurrence, with two local (at the resection margin) and six regional recurrences (five mediastinum, one chest wall). Both local recurrences and one regional recurrence occurred in the 19 patients with T1N0 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: 125I seed implantation along the resected margin for compromised patients undergoing limited resection of lung cancer results in a relatively low incidence of local recurrence and may prolong survival.

Long-term follow-up of a prospective policy of margin-directed radiation dose escalation in breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: A prospectively applied treatment policy for breast-conserving therapy used margin assessment as the exclusive guide to the intensity of radiation therapy directed at the tumor bed. METHODS: From 1982 to 1994, 498 women with 509 Stage I/II breast carcinomas with a median follow-up of 121 months were treated. Final margin status (FMS) categories were defined as greater than 5 mm, greater than 2-5 mm, greater than 0-2 mm, and positive. For margins less than or equal to 2 mm or indeterminate, reexcisions were performed if feasible. All patients received whole breast irradiation to 50.0-50.4 Gy. Final tumor bed boosts as a function of FMS were as follows: no residual on reexcision, no boost performed; FMS greater than 5 mm, boost of 10 Gy; FMS greater than 2-5 mm, boost of 14 Gy; FMS greater than 0-2 mm or positive, boost of 20 Gy. Cases were analyzed for local failure with respect to histology, age, tumor size, excision volume, reexcision, and total dose. RESULTS: FMS was positive, greater than 0-2 mm, greater than 2-5 mm, and greater than 5 mm, and no residual tumor on reexcision in 21%, 20%, 17%, 14%, and 28% of cases, respectively. At 12 years, Kaplan-Meier local failure rates were 17% for FMS positive, 9% for FMS greater than 0-2 mm, 5% for FMS greater than 2-5 mm, 0% for FMS greater than 5 mm, and 6% for specimens without evidence of residuum on reexcision (P = 0.009). Patients 45 years old and younger had a 12-year local failure rate of 15% whereas patients older than 45 years had a 12-year local failure rate of 6% (P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, young age (P = 0.03) predicted increased local failure rate, whereas margins that were less than or equal to 2 mm or positive predicted late (> 5 years) but not early (< or = 5 years) recurrence (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Graded tumor bed dose escalation in response to FMS results in very low rates of local failure over the first 5 years for all FMS categories. However, tumors with close/positive margins have significantly increased local failure rates after 5 years of follow-up even with increased radiation boost dose. In addition, graded tumor bed dose escalation does not fully overcome the adverse influence of young age.

The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Margin width is considered the most important risk factor for local recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The purpose of this report is to assess the predictive utility of lumpectomy specimen margin assessment for the presence and extent of residual DCIS. METHODS: Specimens from 253 DCIS cases with lumpectomy and reexcision were studied to determine to the probability of residual DCIS on reexcision. The probability of residual tumor was evaluated with respect to tumor size, margin status, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, patient age, and the extent of specimen processing (number of sections/volume tissue). Lesions were grouped by size: less than or equal to 2 mm, greater than 2-15 mm, greater than 15-40 mm, or greater than 40 mm. Margin width was recorded as the distance of DCIS to the closest specimen edge or, for positive margins, scored as: extensive (margin involvement in > or =8 sections or >4 low-power fields [LPFs]), moderate (5-7 sections or 2-4 LPFs), minimal (2-4 sections or 1 LPF), or focal (1 section, single focus). The amount of residual tumor was graded by maximum dimension on a semiquantitative basis. RESULTS: Initial excision margin significantly predicted for the presence of residual tumor on reexcision. Residual tumor was found on reexcision in 85% of extensively positive, 68% of moderately positive, 46% of minimally positive, 30% of focally positive, 41% of greater than 0-1 mm, 31% of greater than 1-2 mm, and 0% of greater than 2 mm margins (P < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, margin width and lesion size of initial excision specimens significantly predicted for the presence of residual DCIS on reexcision. Age, grade, necrosis, and extent of specimen processing were not significant prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, both initial margin width (P < 0.0001) and lesion size (P = 0.02) significantly predicted for residual DCIS. As for amount of residual tumor, margin width and initial lesion dimension both significantly predicted for medium to large residuum, whereas age 45 years or younger was of borderline significance on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, margin width and lesion size on initial excision both remained significant predictors of larger volume residual tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The margin status of a DCIS lumpectomy specimen is the most important predictive factor for both the presence and amount of residual disease.