Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 48(1): 178, 2022 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36221102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation (CDG) are a large group of inborn errors of metabolism with more than 140 different CDG types reported to date (1). The first characterized, PMM2-CDG, with an autosomal recessive transmission, is also the most frequent. The PMM2 gene encodes a phosphomannomutase. Here, a novel genetic variation causing PMM2-CDG is reported.  CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a French child, from healthy and unrelated parents, presenting congenital ataxia with hypotonia, hyperlaxity, inverted nipples, as well as altered coagulation parameters and liver function. Transferrin isoelectrofocusing revealed a typical type I CDG profile. Direct Sanger sequencing and quantitative PCR of PMM2 revealed a unique and novel genotype. On one allele, the patient was heterozygote with a known missense variant NM_000303.3(PMM2):c.323C > T, p.Ala108Val in exon 4. On the second allele, whole genome sequencing (WGS) indicated the presence of a novel heterozygous 70 kb deletion. CONCLUSION: We report in the present paper the largest known heterozygous deletion of a PMM2 gene. The observation reveals the impact of a precise diagnostic on genetic counselling: by using WGS, an erroneous conclusion of homozygosity in the case of a relatively rare variant could be avoided, and an index patient with healthy and unrelated parents correctly identified.


Subject(s)
Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation , Child , Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation/diagnosis , Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation/genetics , Heterozygote , Humans , Mutation , Phosphotransferases (Phosphomutases)/deficiency , Transferrins/genetics
2.
Eur Cell Mater ; 29: 42-55; discussion 55-6, 2015 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25552428

ABSTRACT

A degradable, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), gentamicin-loaded prophylactic coating for hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cementless hip prostheses is developed with similar antibacterial efficacy as offered by gentamicin-loaded cements for fixing traditional, cemented prostheses in bone. We describe the development pathway, from in vitro investigation of antibiotic release and antibacterial properties of this PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coating in different in vitro models to an evaluation of its efficacy in preventing implant-related infection in rabbits. Bone in-growth in the absence and presence of the coating was investigated in a canine model. The PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coating showed high-burst release, with antibacterial efficacy in agar-assays completely disappearing after 4 days, minimising risk of inducing antibiotic resistance. Gentamicin-sensitive and gentamicin-resistant staphylococci were killed by the antibiotic-loaded coating, in a simulated prosthesis-related interfacial gap. PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coatings prevented growth of bioluminescent staphylococci around a miniature-stem mounted in bacterially contaminated agar, as observed using bio-optical imaging. PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coated pins inserted in bacterially contaminated medullary canals in rabbits caused a statistically significant reduction in infection rates compared to HA-coated pins without gentamicin. Bone ingrowth to PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coated pins, in condylar defects of Beagle dogs was not impaired by the presence of the degradable, gentamicin-loaded coating. In conclusion, the PLGA-gentamicin-HA-coating constitutes an effective strategy for infection prophylaxis in cementless prostheses.


Subject(s)
Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacology , Durapatite/chemistry , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Hip Prosthesis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bone Cements , Bone Nails , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacokinetics , Dogs , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Female , Femur/surgery , Gentamicins/chemistry , Gentamicins/pharmacokinetics , Lactic Acid/chemistry , Male , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Osseointegration/drug effects , Polyglycolic Acid/chemistry , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Rabbits , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/drug effects , Staphylococcus epidermidis/physiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 87(2): 272-6, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15736756

ABSTRACT

Clinical experience indicates the beneficial effects of antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Although in vitro studies have shown the formation of a biofilm on its surface they have not considered the gap between the cement and the bone. We have investigated bacterial survival in that gap. Samples with gaps 200 microm wide were made of different bone cements. These were stored dry ('pre-elution') or submersed in phosphate-buffered saline to simulate the initial release of gentamicin ('post-elution'). The gaps were subsequently inoculated with bacteria, which had been isolated from infected orthopaedic prostheses and assessed for their sensitivity to gentamicin. Bacterial survival was measured 24 hours after inoculation. All the strains survived in plain cements. In the pre-elution gentamicin-loaded cements only the most gentamicin-resistant strain, CN5115, survived, but in post-elution samples more strains did so, depending on the cement tested. Although high concentrations of gentamicin were demonstrated in the gaps only the gentamicin-sensitive strains were killed. This could explain the increased prevalence of gentamicin-resistant infections which are seen clinically.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/drug effects , Bone Cements , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Biofilms , Colony Count, Microbial , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus/drug effects
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 47(6): 885-91, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11389124

ABSTRACT

In two-stage orthopaedic revision surgery, high local levels of antibiotics are achieved after removal of an infected prosthesis through temporary implantation of gentamicin-loaded beads. However, despite their antibiotic release, these beads act as a biomaterial surface to which bacteria preferentially adhere, grow and potentially develop antibiotic resistance. Gentamicin-loaded beads were retrieved from 20 patients with prosthesis-related infections. Excised tissue samples were taken for routine culture, while beads were analysed in an extensive laboratory procedure. Extensive culture procedures indicated the presence of bacteria on gentamicin-loaded beads in 18 of the 20 patients involved, while 12 of these 18 patients were considered free of infection by routine culture. Nineteen of 28 bacterial strains isolated were gentamicin resistant and cultures from three patients yielded highly gentamicin-resistant sub-populations. It is concluded that routine culture of excised tissues in orthopaedic revision surgery is inadequate to ascertain full eradication of infection, especially as infecting, antibiotic-resistant bacteria preferentially adhere to and grow on gentamicin-loaded beads. Extensive examination of the bead surfaces is proposed as a more reliable indication that infection has been eradicated.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Polymethyl Methacrylate/metabolism , Prostheses and Implants/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Bacteria/drug effects , Biocompatible Materials , Cell Culture Techniques , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Orthopedics , Reoperation
5.
Biomaterials ; 22(12): 1607-11, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11374461

ABSTRACT

In this in vitro study, the formation of a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm on six gentamicin-loaded bone cements (CMW1, CMW3, CMW Endurance, CMW2000, Palacos, and Palamed) was determined in a modified Robbins device over a 3 days time span and related with previously (Van de Belt et al., Biomaterials 21 (2000) 1981) measured kinetics of antibiotic release by these cement brands. The influence of gentamicin release on biofilm formation was quantified by expressing the number of colony-forming units on gentamicin-loaded cement relative to the number of viable organisms on unloaded cement of the same brand. Biofilms formed on all gentamicin-loaded cements, despite the release of antibiotics, followed a consistent pattern in time with a maximum number of colony-forming units per unit cement area found between 24 and 30 h after inoculation. None of the gentamicin-loaded cements showed a reduction in biofilm formation relative to unloaded cements within 6 h after inoculation, whereas only gentamicin-loaded CMW1 and Palacos reduced biofilm formation 24 h after inoculation. Alternatively, CMW Endurance, CMW2000, and Palamed did not exhibit any initial reductions in biofilm formation, but effects started after 72, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Biofilm reduction by gentamicin-loaded CMW3 lasted the longest from 24 to 72 h. Interestingly, each cement seemed to have a different "window-of-effectiveness" with regard to reduction in biofilm formation that did not relate with the gentamicin-release kinetics. Summarising, this study demonstrates that although gentamicin loading of bone cements yields reductions in biofilm formation, S. aureus is able to grow on gentamicin-loaded bone cements.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials , Biofilms/growth & development , Bone Cements , Gentamicins , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Biofilms/drug effects , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Materials Testing , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
6.
Acta Orthop Scand ; 72(6): 557-71, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11817870

ABSTRACT

Infections by bacteria are a serious complication following orthopedic implant surgery, that can usually only be cured by removing the implant, since the biofilm mode of growth of infecting bacteria on an implant surface protects the organisms from the host immune system and antibiotic therapy. Over the past few decades, attempts have been made to prevent and cure orthopedic implant infections by incorporating antibiotics in polymethylmethacrylate bone cements, in primary and revision surgery. However, the clinical efficacy of antibiotic-releasing bone cements is not accepted by all and the long-term exposure to low doses from antibiotic-releasing bone cements in patients is strongly related to the emerging threat of antibiotic resistance in medicine today. In this article, we start by reviewing the mechanisms governing the formation of an infectious biofilm on orthopedic implant materials, the release mechanisms and properties of clinically-used, antibiotic-loaded bone cements. The clinical efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cements is evaluated analyzing separatedly the prophylactic and therapeutic uses of these products.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Biofilms , Bone Cements , Infection Control/methods , Prostheses and Implants/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Biocompatible Materials , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Primary Prevention/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Biomaterials ; 21(19): 1981-7, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10941919

ABSTRACT

In this study, the release of gentamicin as a function of time was measured for six different gentamicin-loaded bone cements and related with the surface roughness, porosity and wettability of the cements. Initial release rates varied little between the six bone cements (CMW1, CMW3, CMW Endurance, CMW 2000, Palacos, and Palamed) and ranged from 8.6 to 14.1 microg/cm2/h. The total amounts of gentamicin released after 1 week varied between 4.0 and 5.3% of the total amount of antibiotic incorporated for the CMW cements and was 8.4% for Palacos. Palamed released after 1 week significantly more of the gentamicin incorporated (17.0%). The wettability of all cements was similar (water contact angles between 70 and 80 degrees), but the surface roughness and the porosity of the cements varied markedly. Initial release rates increased with surface roughness, although the correlation coefficient was low (0.64), while total amounts released increased linearly (correlation coefficient 0.97) with the bulk porosity of the cements. Consequently, it can be concluded that the release kinetics of gentamicin from bone cements is controlled by a combination of surface roughness and porosity.


Subject(s)
Bone Cements/chemistry , Gentamicins , Kinetics , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Structure-Activity Relationship , Surface Properties , Time Factors
8.
Acta Orthop Scand ; 71(6): 625-9, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11145392

ABSTRACT

We measured the formation of a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro on unloaded and gentamicin-loaded bone cements (CMW3 and Palacos R) and related the formation to antibiotic release rates. All experiments were done in triplicate. Microbial growth on gentamicin-loaded cements occurred despite the release of antibiotic. Biofilm formation on gentamicin loaded CMW3 bone cement was one fourth to one fifth less than on the unloaded bone cement, while biofilm formation on Palacos R bone cement was not significantly affected by antibiotic loading. More gentamicin was released from CMW3 (79 mg) than from Palacos R (70 mg), but the percentage gentamicin released after one week relative to the total amount incorporated was significantly lower for CMW3 (4.7%) than for Palacos R (8.4%). After one day, subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics were eluted from the cements. We concluded that antibiotic-loaded bone cement does not necessarily inhibit the formation of an infectious biofilm in vitro.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Biofilms , Bone Cements , Drug Delivery Systems , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Staphylococcus aureus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Gentamicins/pharmacokinetics , In Vitro Techniques , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...