Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children and adolescents-Clinicopathological findings.

BACKGROUND: Barely two per million Belgian children/adolescents are diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) annually. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic features, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and treatment outcome of this rare entity. METHODS: Medical records of all pediatric CML patients (age ≤ 17 years) diagnosed at the University Hospitals Leuven between 1986 and 2021 were reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (median age at diagnosis 12.5 years) were included, all presenting in chronic phase. Five patients were diagnosed before 2003; main therapy included hydroxyurea (n = 5/5), interferon-alfa (n = 3/5) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-Tx) (n = 3/5). Complete hematologic response (CHR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) was reached in resp. 4/5, 4/5 and in 2/3 of evaluable patients. Three patients progressed to accelerated/blast phase (median time 19 months) and 1/5 is alive and disease-free at last follow-up. Nine patients were diagnosed after 2003 and were treated with first generation (1°G) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI): 3/9 subsequently underwent an allo-Tx, 4/9 were switched to 2°G TKI, one patient was additionally switched to 3°G TKI. CHR, CCyR and MMR was reached in 9/9, 9/9 and 8/9 of these patients. No progression to accelerated/blast phase was observed and none of these patients deceased. At last follow-up, 7/9 patients were in MMR or disease free, the two remaining patients did not reach or lost MMR, both related to compliance issues. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that TKI significantly improved the prognosis of pediatric CML. However, drug compliance poses a considerable challenge.

Serial measurement of circulating calprotectin as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19 patients in intensive care setting.

OBJECTIVES: Circulating calprotectin (cCLP) has been shown to be a promising prognostic marker for COVID-19 severity. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of serial measurements of cCLP in COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: From November 2020 to May 2021, patients with COVID-19, admitted at the ICU of the OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium, were prospectively included. For sixty-six (66) patients, blood samples were collected at admission and subsequently every 48 h during ICU stay. On every sample (total n=301), a cCLP (EliA™ Calprotectin 2, Phadia 200, Thermo Fisher Scientific; serum/plasma protocol (for Research Use Only, -RUO-) and C-reactive protein (CRP; cobas c501/c503, Roche Diagnostics) analysis were performed. Linear mixed models were used to associate biomarkers levels with mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, length of stay at ICU (LOS-ICU) and medication use (antibiotics, corticosteroids, antiviral and immune suppressant/modulatory drugs). RESULTS: Longitudinally higher levels of all biomarkers were associated with LOS-ICU and with the need for mechanical ventilation. Medication use and LOS-ICU were not associated with variations in cCLP and CRP levels. cCLP levels increased significantly during ICU hospitalization in the deceased group (n=21/66) but decreased in the non-deceased group (n=45/66). In contrast, CRP levels decreased non-significantly in both patient groups, although significantly longitudinally higher CRP levels were obtained in the deceased subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements of cCLP provides prognostic information which can be useful to guide clinical management of COVID-19 patients in ICU setting.

Severity of COVID-19 among Hospitalized Patients: Omicron Remains a Severe Threat for Immunocompromised Hosts.

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the general population in the context of a relatively high immunity gained through the early waves of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), and vaccination campaigns. Despite this context, a significant number of patients were hospitalized, and identifying the risk factors associated with severe disease in the Omicron era is critical for targeting further preventive, and curative interventions. We retrospectively analyzed the individual medical records of 1501 SARS-CoV-2 positive hospitalized patients between 13 December 2021, and 13 February 2022, in Belgium, of which 187 (12.5%) were infected with Delta, and 1036 (69.0%) with Omicron. Unvaccinated adults showed an increased risk of moderate/severe/critical/fatal COVID-19 (crude OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.09-2.16) compared to vaccinated patients, whether infected with Omicron or Delta. In adults infected with Omicron and moderate/severe/critical/fatal COVID-19 (n = 323), immunocompromised patients showed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality related to COVID-19 (adjusted OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.39-4.22), compared to non-immunocompromised patients. The upcoming impact of the pandemic will be defined by evolving viral variants, and the immune system status of the population. The observations support that, in the context of an intrinsically less virulent variant, vaccination and underlying patient immunity remain the main drivers of severe disease.

Serum free light chain analysis: persisting limitations with new kids on the block.

OBJECTIVES: Serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements have inherent analytical limitations impacting sFLC clinical interpretation. We evaluated analytical and diagnostic performance of three polyclonal sFLC assays on four analytical platforms. METHODS: sFLC concentration was measured using Diazyme FLC assays (Diazyme) on cobas c501/c503 analyzer (Roche); Freelite assays (The Binding Site) on Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site) and cobas c501 analyzer and Sebia FLC ELISA assays (Sebia) on AP22 ELITE analyzer (DAS). Imprecision, linearity, method comparison vs. Freelite/Optilite, antigen excess detection and reference value verification were assessed. Diagnostic performance was compared on 120 serum samples and on follow-up samples of five patients with κ and λ monoclonal gammopathy. RESULTS: Method comparison showed excellent correlation with Freelite/Optilite method for all assays. A large proportional negative bias was shown for both Sebia κ and λ ELISA and a significant positive proportional bias for λ in the low (<10 mg/L) Freelite/cobas c501 method. Clinically relevant underestimation of κ sFLC levels due to antigen excess was shown for 7% of each Diazyme/cobas application and for 11 and 32.1% of λ sFLC assay of respectively Diazyme/cobas and Sebia/AP22. sFLC reference values revealed application specific. Cohen's κ values were (very) good for κ sFLC but only moderate to good for λ sFLC. In 4/10 follow-up patients, significant differences in clinical interpretation between sFLC assays were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Important analytical limitations remain for all sFLC applications. Differences in reference values and diagnostic performance hamper interchangeability of sFLC assays. Assay specific sFLC decision guidelines are warranted.

Early SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections within 60 Days and Implications for Retesting Policies.

Illustrated by a clinical case supplemented by epidemiologic data, early reinfections with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 after infection with Delta variant, and reinfection with Omicron BA.2 after Omicron BA.1 infection, can occur within 60 days, especially in young, unvaccinated persons. The case definition of reinfection, which influences retesting policies, should be reconsidered.

Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Compared with Delta among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Belgium during Autumn and Winter Season 2021-2022.

This retrospective multi-center matched cohort study assessed the risk for severe COVID-19 (combination of severity indicators), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients when infected with the Omicron variant compared to when infected with the Delta variant. The study is based on a causal framework using individually-linked data from national COVID-19 registries. The study population consisted of 954 COVID-19 patients (of which, 445 were infected with Omicron) above 18 years old admitted to a Belgian hospital during the autumn and winter season 2021-2022, and with available viral genomic data. Patients were matched based on the hospital, whereas other possible confounders (demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status, socio-economic status, and ICU occupancy) were adjusted for by using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The estimated standardized risk for severe COVID-19 and ICU admission in hospitalized patients was significantly lower (RR = 0.63; 95% CI (0.30; 0.97) and RR = 0.56; 95% CI (0.14; 0.99), respectively) when infected with the Omicron variant, whereas in-hospital mortality was not significantly different according to the SARS-CoV-2 variant (RR = 0.78, 95% CI (0.28-1.29)). This study demonstrates the added value of integrated genomic and clinical surveillance to recognize the multifactorial nature of COVID-19 pathogenesis.

Prognostic value of circulating calprotectin levels on the clinical course of COVID-19 differs between serum, heparin, EDTA and citrate sample types.

INTRODUCTION: During the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, circulating calprotectin (cCLP) gained interest as biomarker to predict the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cCLP measured in serum, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: COVID-19 patients were prospectively included, in parallel with two SARS-CoV-2 negative control populations. The prognostic value of cCLP was compared with IL-6, CRP, LDH, procalcitonin, and the 4C-mortality score by AUROC analysis. RESULTS: For the 136 COVID-19 patients, cCLP levels were higher compared to the respective control populations, with significantly higher cCLP levels in serum and heparin than in EDTA or citrate. Higher cCLP levels were obtained for COVID-19 patients with i) severe/critical illness (n = 70), ii) ICU admission (n = 66) and iii) need for mechanical ventilation/ECMO (n = 25), but iv) not in patients who deceased within 30 days (n = 41). The highest discriminatory power (AUC [95% CI]) for each defined outcome was i) CRP (0.835 [0.755-0.914]); ii) EDTA cCLP (0.780 [0.688-0.873]); iii) EDTA cCLP (0.842 [0.758-0.925]) and iv) the 4C-mortality score (0.713 [0.608-0.818]). CONCLUSION: Measuring cCLP in COVID-19 patients helps the clinician to predict the clinical course of COVID-19. The discriminatory power of EDTA and citrate plasma cCLP levels often outperforms heparin plasma cCLP levels.

Circulating calprotectin as biomarker in neutrophil-related inflammation: Pre-analytical recommendations and reference values according to sample type.

BACKGROUND: Calprotectin (CLP) is a promising biomarker for the evaluation of neutrophil-related inflammation. Our aim was to establish reference values for circulating CLP in different sample types and to study the effect of pre-analytical variables. METHODS: Reference values were determined in 100 healthy individuals. Pre-analytical variables were evaluated in 10 healthy controls and four rheumatoid arthritis patients with active disease and covered sample type (serum with/without gel separator, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma), pre-centrifugation time (<2 h, 6 h, 24 h), storage condition (2-8 °C, 18-25 °C, 30 °C) and storage time (24 h, 72 h, 7 days). CLP measurements were performed with the EliA™Calprotectin 2 assay on Phadia™200 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RESULTS: In healthy controls, baseline CLP concentrations in serum were more than double the concentration in EDTA and citrate plasma (0.909 µg/mL versus 0.259 µg/mL and 0.261 µg/mL respectively). Heparin, EDTA and citrate stabilized CLP concentrations for up to 6 h before centrifugation, whereas significant increases in CLP levels were observed when serum was left untreated during that time period. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies on circulating CLP need to apply sample type-specific reference values and decision limits. To obtain reproducible CLP results in serum, more stringent pre-analytical sample handling instructions are needed.

Diagnostic and analytical performance evaluation of ten commercial assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune response.

OBJECTIVE: Analytical validation of newly released SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in the clinical laboratory is crucial to ensure sufficient performance in respect to its intended use. We aimed to assess analytical and diagnostic performance of 8 (semi-)quantitative assays detecting anti-nucleocapsid IgG (Euroimmun, Id-Vet) or total Ig (Roche), anti-spike protein IgG (Euroimmun, Theradiag, DiaSorin, Thermo Fisher) or both (Theradiag) and 2 rapid lateral flow assays (LFA) (AAZ-LMB and Theradiag). METHODS: Specificity was evaluated using a cross-reactivity panel of 85 pre-pandemic serum samples. Sensitivity was determined at both the manufacturer's and a 95% specificity cut-off level, using 81 serum samples of patients with a positive rRT-PCR. Sensitivity was determined in function of time post symptoms onset. RESULTS: Specificity for all assays ranged from 92.9% to 100% (Roche and Thermo Fisher) with the exception of the Theradiag IgM LFA (82.4%). Sensitivity in asymptomatic patients ranged between 41.7% and 58.3%. Sensitivity on samples taken <10 days since symptom onset was low (23.3%-66.7%) and increased on samples taken between 10 and 20 days and > 20 days since symptom onset (80%-96% and 92.9%-100%, respectively). From 20 days after symptom onset, the Roche, Id-vet and Thermo Fisher assays all met the sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (>97%) targets determined by the WHO. Antibody signal response was significantly higher in the critically ill patient group. CONCLUSION: Antibody detection can complement rRT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19, especially in the later stage, or in asymptomatic patients for epidemiological purposes. Addition of IgM in LFAs did not improve sensitivity.

Pyelonephritis and bacteremia caused by Haemophilus parainfluenzae: case-report of an unusual pathogen.

We present a case of a young man with known urinary tract abnormalities who developed pyelonephritis and bacteremia caused by Haemophilus parainfluenzae. Since routine urine culture usually does not include enriched media for Haemophilus spp., the true incidence of urinary tract infections caused by H. parainfluenzae is currently unknown. Our case, however, demonstrates that H. parainfluenzae is a potential urinary pathogen, at least in patients with urinary tract anomalies. Clinical laboratories should consider expanding their culture efforts to detect unusual pathogens in patients with underlying risk factors.