First detection of ivermectin resistance in oesophagostomum dentatum in pigs.

In 2016 suspected reduced ivermectin (IVM) efficacy in Oesophagostomum species in pigs was reported in England. Following this initial report, APHA raised awareness amongst private pig veterinary practitioners of the need to monitor the efficacy of the worm control on pig units. In 2017 another veterinary practitioner highlighted a potential in-field lack of IVM efficacy in treating Oesophagostomum species in sows on another breeder-finisher unit. In this trial, the efficacy of IVM against Oesophagostomum species worms has been investigated to determine whether suspected reduced efficacy (52% reduction in mean faecal egg count 14 days post ivermectin administration) on a mixed indoor and outdoor breeder-finisher pig farm in England reflected true IVM resistance under controlled experimental conditions. On days 0 and 40 of the trial, twenty helminth-naive pigs were artificially infected per os with 5000 Oesophagostomum L3 obtained from the farm under investigation. The pigs were allocated to treatment or control groups (n = 10 per group). Treatment group pigs received IVM (0.3 mg kg body weight) by sub-cutaneous injection as per manufacturer's instructions on day 44. Control group animals were left untreated. Faecal worm egg counts were monitored throughout the trial from day 15 post infection to determine time to patency. On day 50 all pigs were euthanased to assess the worm burdens. Resistance to IVM was confirmed in Oesophagostomum dentatum based on the results of a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and a controlled efficacy test (CET). Efficacy based on mean reduction in faecal egg count of IVM-treated pigs compared to untreated control pigs was 86%. Mean reduction in IVM-treated pig worm burdens was 5% against an adult worm population and 94% against an L3/L4 population. The apparent discrepancy between FECRT and CET efficacy results appears to be due to egg development and/or oviposition suppression in IVM-treated female worms. The detection of IVM resistance in Oesophagostomum species worms for the first time in UK pigs is particularly important considering the global situation where resistance to pyrantel, levamisole and benzimidazole anthelmintics in Oesophagostomum species in pigs have already been reported. The results also provide an opportunity to discuss the wider issue of anthelmintic usage and efficacy on pig farms and highlight the need for wider surveillance for the occurrence of anthelmintic resistance in pigs.

Animal influence on water, sanitation and hygiene measures for zoonosis control at the household level: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Neglected zoonotic diseases (NZDs) have a significant impact on the livelihoods of the world's poorest populations, which often lack access to basic services. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) programmes are included among the key strategies for achieving the World Health Organization's 2020 Roadmap for Implementation for control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). There exists a lack of knowledge regarding the effect of animals on the effectiveness of WASH measures. OBJECTIVES: This review looked to identify how animal presence in the household influences the effectiveness of water, hygiene and sanitation measures for zoonotic disease control in low and middle income countries; to identify gaps of knowledge regarding this topic based on the amount and type of studies looking at this particular interaction. METHODS: Studies from three databases (Medline, Web of Science and Global Health) were screened through various stages. Selected articles were required to show burden of one or more zoonotic diseases, an animal component and a WASH component. Selected articles were analysed. A narrative synthesis was chosen for the review. RESULTS: Only two studies out of 7588 met the inclusion criteria. The studies exemplified how direct or indirect contact between animals and humans within the household can influence the effectiveness of WASH interventions. The analysis also shows the challenges faced by the scientific community to isolate and depict this particular interaction. CONCLUSION: The dearth of studies examining animal-WASH interactions is explained by the difficulties associated with studying environmental interventions and the lack of collaboration between the WASH and Veterinary Public Health research communities. Further tailored research under a holistic One Health approach will be required in order to meet the goals set in the NTDs Roadmap and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.