Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) ; 73(6): 725-735, Nov.Dec. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1520381

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: Ultra-low-dose Spinal Anesthesia (SA) is the practice of employing minimal doses of intrathecal agents so that only the roots that supply a specific area are anesthetized. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultra-low-dose spinal anesthesia with that of Perineal Blocks (PB). Methods: A two-arm, parallel, double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing two anesthetic techniques (SA and PB) for hemorrhoidectomy and anal fistula surgery was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain, complementation and/or conversion of anesthesia, and hemodynamic changes. Results: Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The mean pain values were similar in the first 48 h in both groups (p > 0.05). The individuals allocated to the SA group did not need anesthetic complementation; however, those in the PB group required it considerably (SA group, 0% vs. PB group, 25%; p = 0.005). Hemodynamic changes were more pronounced after PB: during all surgical times, the PB group showed lower MAP values and higher HR values (p < 0.05). Postoperative urinary retention rates were similar between both groups (SA group 0% vs. PB group 3.1%, p = 0.354). Conclusion: SA and PB are similarly effective in pain control during the first 48 h after hemorrhoidec-tomy and anal fistula surgery. Although surgical time was shorter among patients in the PB group, the SA technique may be preferable as it avoids the need for additional anesthesia. Furthermore, the group that received perineal blocks was under sedation with a considerable dose of propofol.


Subject(s)
Humans , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthetics , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Anesthesia, Local
2.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 27: 8-13, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34801927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5-7 % of pregnant women have hypertension during pregnancy, requiring antihypertensive drug treatment. There have been a lack of studies evaluating how drug-related problems (DRPs) affect morbidity or mortality in the postpartum period among women with a history of preeclampsia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of drug-related problems on length of hospital stay of postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included postpartum women diagnosed with preeclampsia, from June to November 2016, in two teaching maternity hospitals in Brazil. The outcomes assessed were, length of hospital stay of postpartum women. The DRPs were classified through the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Foundation (PCNE) v 8.01. RESULTS: 600 women were included, and 354 (59%) were exposed to at least one DRP. The most frequent DRPs were no administration of the prescribed medication, lack of prescription of a medication, although the indication was clear, and ineffectiveness (unknown reason). In patients exposed to DRP, the average length of hospital stay after labour was 5.4 (S.D. 3.6) days versus 4.4 (S.D. 3.3) days in patients non-exposed to DRP (p = 0.0001). The period (in days) to achieve blood pressure control after labour was 4.5 (S.D. 3.5) 3.5 (S.D. 3.2), respectively (p = 0.0001). There were no deaths during the study. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Drug-related problems significantly increased the length of hospital stay in postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Eclampsia/drug therapy , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Postpartum Period , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
3.
Rev. enferm. UFPE on line ; 12(9): 2334-2340, set. 2018. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-995760

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: avaliar o grau de satisfação dos usuários em relação ao acesso e ao acolhimento da Estratégia de Saúde da Família. Método: estudo quantitativo, transversal, descritivo e exploratório com 202 indivíduos cadastrados na Unidade de Saúde que responderam ao questionário de Kloetzel. Sistematizaram-se os dados com o auxílio do Google Documentos, do Microsoft Excel e do SPSS, versão 13.0. Avaliaram-se a relação entre os dados categóricos pelo teste qui-quadrado e a comparação de média entre os grupos pelo teste de T para amostras independentes. Resultados: a maior parte dos usuários classifica os serviços como "muito bom" ou "bom". Os pontos de maior satisfação foram a "forma de agendamento da consulta" (59%) e a "facilidade de acesso" à unidade (54,5%), enquanto que o "tempo despendido na sala de espera" foi o único ponto de insatisfação (62,4%). O grau de satisfação dos usuários não sofreu alterações segundo o perfil sociodemográfico. Conclusão: o grau de satisfação dos usuários foi positivo. O estudo contribui para a reflexão de profissionais da Estratégia de Saúde da Família e gestores quanto às relações existentes entre o acesso, o acolhimento e a satisfação do usuário na perspectiva de melhoria dos serviços de saúde.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Primary Health Care , Professional-Patient Relations , Patient Satisfaction , National Health Strategies , User Embracement , Health Services Accessibility , Quality of Health Care , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies
4.
Saudi Pharm J ; 25(7): 1073-1077, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, there is still very limited information about the risk and safety of prescription drugs during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in high-risk pregnant women after hospital admission. A prospective study was carried out in a teaching maternity hospital in Brazil during six months. Causality of ADRs was assessed through the Naranjo Algorithm and Korean Algorithm for ADR Causality Assessment. Severity of ADRs was assessed using Hartwig's Severity Assessment Scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of ADRs among the 294 inpatients studied was 8.8%. The mean age was 27.14 (±7.5) y.o. Patient's age was related to the presence of ADRs, while the manifestation of these events was not associated with any adverse pregnancy outcome. 75.9% of the ADRs reported in the study were of mild severity and 24.1% were of moderate severity. No ADR was caused by drug-drug interaction; however, a significant increase in blood pressure was observed in all patients using concurrent methyldopa and ferrous sulfate. CONCLUSION: Overall, ADRs were not common events among high-risk pregnant women and no adverse pregnancy outcomes following these events were observed.

7.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 10(3): 554-61, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24268603

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) remains one of the most widely used mechanisms to assess patient adherence. Its translation and testing on languages in addition to English would be very useful in research and in practice. OBJECTIVE: To translate and examine the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the structured self-report eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale among patients with hypertension. METHODS: The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey conducted in six Family Health Units of the Brazilian Unified Health System, in Maceió, between March 2011 and April 2012. After a standard "forward-backward" procedure to translate MMAS-8 into Portuguese, the questionnaire was applied to 937 patients with hypertension. Reliability was tested using a measure of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and test-retest reliability. Validity was confirmed using known groups validity. Three levels of adherence were considered based on the following scores: 0 to <6 (low); 6 to <8 (medium); 8 (high). RESULTS: The mean age of respondents was 57.1 years (SD = 12.7 years), and 71.5% were female. The mean number of prescribed antihypertensives per patient was 1.62 (SD = 0.67). The mean score for the medication adherence scale was 5.78 (SD = 1.88). Moderate internal consistency was found (Cronbach's alpha = 0.682), and test-retest reliability was satisfactory (Spearman's r = 0.928; P < 0.001). A significant relationship between MMAS-8 levels of adherence and BP control (chi-square, 8.281; P = 0.016) was found. 46.0%, 33.6%, and 20.4% of patients had low, medium, and high adherence, respectively. The self-report measure sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 86.1%, 31.2%, 57.4% and 68.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the MMAS-8 indicates that it is a reliable and valid measure to detect patients at risk of non-adherence. The MMAS-8 could still be used in routine care to support communication about the medication-taking behavior in hypertensive patients.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/methods
8.
Rev Saude Publica ; 47(4): 759-67; discussion 768, 2013 Aug.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24346667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze medication use and associated factors among the elderly. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 400 elderly people aged over 60 living in the urban area covered by the Family Health Strategy program in Recife, Northeastern Brazil in 2009. Individuals were selected by systematic random sampling and household data were collected. Demographic, socio-economic, lifestyle factors including nutrition practices and health variables were evaluated. Medication use was the independent variable. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of medication use was 85.5%. Polypharmacy (> 5 drugs) occurred in 11% of cases. Of the 951 drugs reported, 98.2% were prescribed by doctors and 21.6% were considered unsafe for the elderly. The most commonly prescribed groups were: cardiovascular drugs (42.9%), central nervous system agents (20.2%) and drugs with an effect on the digestive tract and metabolism (17.3%). The use of polypharmacy was associated with education (p = 0.008), self-reported health (p = 0.012), self-reported chronic disease (p = 0.000) and the number of doctor appointments per year (0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a high proportion of medication use among the elderly, including of those considered unsuitable, and inequality among groups of elderly individuals regarding the use of medication, when education, number of doctor appointments and self-reported health are considered.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Polypharmacy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Self Medication , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
9.
Rev. saúde pública ; 47(4): 759-768, ago. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-695417

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO Analisar o uso de medicamentos entre idosos e os fatores associados. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal com 400 indivíduos maiores de 60 anos residentes na área de abrangência da Estratégia Saúde da Família, em Recife, PE, em 2009. Os indivíduos foram selecionados por amostra probabilística sistemática, com coleta de dados de base domiciliar. Foram avaliadas variáveis socioeconômicas e demográficas, estilo de vida, condições de saúde e nutricionais. A variável independente foi uso de medicamentos. O diagrama analítico envolveu análises estatísticas uni e multivariadas. RESULTADOS A prevalência de uso de medicamentos foi de 85,5%. A polifarmácia (> 5 medicamentos) ocorreu em 11% dos casos. Dos 951 medicamentos relatados, 98,2% foram por prescrição médica e 21,6% foram considerados inseguros para idosos. Os medicamentos de uso nos sistemas cardiovascular (42,9%), nervoso central (20,2%), digestório e no metabolismo orgânico (17,3%) foram os mais utilizados. O uso de polifarmácia associou-se à escolaridade (p = 0,008), à saúde autorreferida (p = 0,012), à doença crônica autorreferida (p = 0,000) e ao número de consultas médicas ao ano (0,000). CONCLUSÕES A proporção de uso de medicamentos é elevada entre idosos, inclusive daqueles considerados inadequados, e há desigualdades entre grupos de idosos quando se considera escolaridade, quantidade de consultas médicas e saúde autorreferida. .


OBJETIVO Analizar el uso de medicamentos entre ancianos y los factores asociados MÉTODOS Estudio transversal con 400 individuos mayores de 60 años residentes en área abarcada por la Estrategia Salud de la Familia, en Recife, PE, Brasil, 2009. Los individuos fueron seleccionados por muestreo probabilístico sistemático, con colecta de datos de tipo domiciliar. Se evaluaron variables socioeconómicas y demográficas, estilo de vida, condiciones de salud y nutricionales. La variable independiente fue el uso de medicamentos. El diagrama analítico involucró análisis estadísticos uni y multivariados. RESULTADOS La prevalencia del uso de medicamentos fue de 85,5%. La polifarmacia (> 5 medicamentos) ocurrió en 11% de los casos. De los 951 medicamentos relatados, 98,2% fueron por prescripción médica y 21,6% fueron considerados inseguros para ancianos. Los medicamentos de uso en los sistemas cardiovascular (42,9%), nervioso central (20,2%), digestivo y en el metabolismo orgánico (17,3%) fueron los más utilizados. El uso de polifarmacia se asoció con la escolaridad (p=0,008), la salud auto-referida (p=0,012), la enfermedad crónica auto-referida (p=0,000) y el número de consultas médicas por año (p=0,000). CONCLUSIONES La proporción de uso de medicamentos es elevada entre ancianos, inclusive en aquellos considerados inadecuados, y desigualdades entre grupos de ancianos al considerarse la escolaridad, cantidad de consultas médicas y la salud auto-referida. .


OBJECTIVE To analyze medication use and associated factors among the elderly. METHODS A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 400 elderly people aged over 60 living in the urban area covered by the Family Health Strategy program in Recife, Northeastern Brazil in 2009. Individuals were selected by systematic random sampling and household data were collected. Demographic, socio-economic, lifestyle factors including nutrition practices and health variables were evaluated. Medication use was the independent variable. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS : The prevalence of medication use was 85.5%. Polypharmacy (> 5 drugs) occurred in 11% of cases. Of the 951 drugs reported, 98.2% were prescribed by doctors and 21.6% were considered unsafe for the elderly. The most commonly prescribed groups were: cardiovascular drugs (42.9%), central nervous system agents (20.2%) and drugs with an effect on the digestive tract and metabolism (17.3%). The use of polypharmacy was associated with education (p = 0.008), self-reported health (p = 0.012), self-reported chronic disease (p = 0.000) and the number of doctor appointments per year (0.000). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate a high proportion of medication use among the elderly, including of those considered unsuitable, and inequality among groups of elderly individuals regarding the use ofmedication, when education, number of doctor appointments and self-reported health are considered. .


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Polypharmacy , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Self Medication , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
10.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 99(1): 649-658, jul. 2012. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-647737

ABSTRACT

FUNDAMENTO: A não adesão terapêutica é um importante e frequentemente não reconhecido fator de risco que contribui para o reduzido controle da Pressão Arterial (PA). OBJETIVO: Determinar a relação entre a adesão terapêutica mensurada a partir de uma versão validada em português da MMAS-8 e o controle da PA em pacientes ambulatoriais hipertensos. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo transversal com pacientes hipertensos maiores de 18 anos atendidos em seis unidades da Estratégia de Saúde da Família, em Maceió (AL), por meio de entrevistas e mensuração da pressão arterial em domicílio, entre janeiro e abril de 2011. A adesão foi determinada por meio de versão da MMAS-8 traduzida para realização deste estudo. Foram considerados aderentes aqueles pacientes com pontuação igual a 8 na MMAS-8. RESULTADOS: A prevalência da adesão terapêutica entre os 223 pacientes investigados foi de 19,7%, enquanto 34% apresentaram PA controlada (> 140/90 mmHg). O valor médio de adesão segundo a MMAS-8 foi 5,8 (±1,8). Os pacientes aderentes se revelaram mais propensos (OR = 6,1; IC [95%] = 3,0 a 12,0) a ter a pressão arterial sob controle do que aqueles que atingiram valores médios (6 a <8) ou baixos (<6) no score de adesão. A versão em português da MMAS-8 apresentou associação significativa com o controle da PA (p = 0,000). CONCLUSÃO: O diagnóstico do comportamento não aderente por meio da aplicação da MMAS-8 em pacientes sob uso de medicamentos anti-hipertensivos foi fator preditivo de valores elevados de PA sistólica e diastólica.


BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to treatment is an important and often unrecognized risk factor that contributes to reduced control of blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between treatment adherence measured by a validated version in Portuguese of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and BP control in hypertensive outpatients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with hypertensive patients older than 18 years, treated at six of the Family Health Strategy Units in Maceió (AL), through interviews and home blood pressure measurements, between January and April 2011. Adherence was determined by MMAS-8 version translated for this study. The patients were considered adherent when they had a score equal to 8 at the MMAS-8. RESULTS: The prevalence of adherence among the 223 patients studied was 19.7%, while 34% had controlled BP (> 140/90 mmHg). The average adherence value according to the MMAS-8 was 5.8 (± 1.8). Adherent patients showed to be more prone (OR = 6.1, CI [95%] = 3.0 to 12.0) to have blood pressure control than those who reached mean (6 to <8) or low values (<6) at the adherence score. The Portuguese version of MMAS-8 was showed a significant association with BP control (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of non-adherent behavior through the application of MMAS-8 in patients using of antihypertensive medications was predictive of elevated systolic and diastolic BP.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/prevention & control , Medication Adherence , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Language , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Translating
11.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 99(1): 649-58, 2012 Jul.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22688844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to treatment is an important and often unrecognized risk factor that contributes to reduced control of blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between treatment adherence measured by a validated version in Portuguese of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and BP control in hypertensive outpatients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with hypertensive patients older than 18 years, treated at six of the Family Health Strategy Units in Maceió (AL), through interviews and home blood pressure measurements, between January and April 2011. Adherence was determined by MMAS-8 version translated for this study. The patients were considered adherent when they had a score equal to 8 at the MMAS-8. RESULTS: The prevalence of adherence among the 223 patients studied was 19.7%, while 34% had controlled BP (> 140/90 mmHg). The average adherence value according to the MMAS-8 was 5.8 (± 1.8). Adherent patients showed to be more prone (OR = 6.1, CI [95%] = 3.0 to 12.0) to have blood pressure control than those who reached mean (6 to <8) or low values (<6) at the adherence score. The Portuguese version of MMAS-8 was showed a significant association with BP control (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of non-adherent behavior through the application of MMAS-8 in patients using of antihypertensive medications was predictive of elevated systolic and diastolic BP.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/prevention & control , Medication Adherence , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Translating
12.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet ; 34(4): 147-52, 2012 Apr.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22584809

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess medication adherence therapeutic during pregnancy in a sample of Brazilian women during the post-partum period. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the obstetric unit of a university hospital, Brazil, between August and November 2010. We recruited patients aged 18 years or more, with a gestational age of more than 22 weeks whose newborns weighed more than 500 g. Patients were excluded if they used sedatives or other mind-altering drugs. Data were collected after labor using a structured questionnaire containing questions about sociodemographic characteristics, medication use, number of previous pregnancies, contraceptive methods, prenatal care, and medication adherence. Medication adherence was assessed using the four-item Morisky medication adherence scale - MMAS-4, groups were compared by the Fisher exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test and Χ2 de Pearson Test. RESULTS: Mean age was 22.5 years (SD=6.5), and 53.8% of the pregnant women had initiated prenatal care during the first trimester of pregnancy. Of the 130 patients interviewed, 96.9% had used at least one prescribed drug during pregnancy, with an average of 2.8 drugs per patient. The major classes prescribed were antianemics (55.1%), analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and antipyretics (19.0%) and anti-infectives (7.2%). 71.6% took two to four drugs. Only 19.2% of patients were considered adherent. The variables that showed a negative influence on adherence were: higher level of education, having one's own income, earlier prenatal care and previous abortion. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that, although most of the patients used prescribed drugs during pregnancy, the rate of medication adherence was low, which indicates the need for further investigation about the impact of non-adherence during pregnancy and its causes.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Self Report , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
13.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 34(4): 147-152, abr. 2012. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-624742

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a adesão terapêutica autorreferida durante a gestação em amostra de mulheres brasileiras. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo transversal com puérperas internadas no serviço de obstetrícia de um hospital universitário, entre agosto e novembro de 2010. Foram incluídas puérperas com 18 anos ou mais, idade gestacional superior a 22 semanas e peso do feto igual ou maior que 500 g. Foram excluídas puérperas em uso de sedativos e/ou outros medicamentos capazes de alterar o estado de consciência. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevista face a face, com uso de questionário estruturado contendo perguntas sobre características sociodemográficas, uso de medicamentos, número de gestações anteriores, métodos contraceptivos utilizados, atendimento pré-natal e adesão terapêutica. Para a determinação da adesão, foi utilizada a escala de adesão terapêutica de Morisky - MMAS-4 de quatro itens. Foram utilizados o Teste H de Kruskal-Wallis e o Teste de Χ2 de Pearson e exato de Fisher para análise estatística. RESULTADOS: A média de idade das gestantes foi de 22,5 anos (DP=6,5), das quais 53,8% iniciaram acompanhamento pré-natal no primeiro trimestre da gravidez. Das 130 pacientes entrevistadas, 96,9% fizeram uso de algum medicamento durante o período gestacional, com média de 2,8 medicamentos por paciente. As principais classes prescritas foram: antianêmicos (55,1%); analgésicos, anti-inflamatórios e antipiréticos (19,0%); e anti-infecciosos (7,2%). Fizeram uso de dois a quatro medicamentos 71,6% das pacientes. Apenas 19,2% das pacientes foram consideradas aderentes. As pacientes com menores taxas de adesão foram aquelas com maior escolaridade, renda própria, início do acompanhamento pré-natal no primeiro trimestre de gravidez e aborto prévio. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar de a maioria das gestantes fazer uso de medicamentos prescritos durante a gestação, a taxa de adesão ao tratamento foi baixa, indicando uma necessidade de investigações adicionais sobre o impacto da não adesão durante a gestação e suas causas.


PURPOSE: To assess medication adherence therapeutic during pregnancy in a sample of Brazilian women during the post-partum period. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the obstetric unit of a university hospital, Brazil, between August and November 2010. We recruited patients aged 18 years or more, with a gestational age of more than 22 weeks whose newborns weighed more than 500 g. Patients were excluded if they used sedatives or other mind-altering drugs. Data were collected after labor using a structured questionnaire containing questions about sociodemographic characteristics, medication use, number of previous pregnancies, contraceptive methods, prenatal care, and medication adherence. Medication adherence was assessed using the four-item Morisky medication adherence scale - MMAS-4, groups were compared by the Fisher exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test and Χ2 de Pearson Test. RESULTS: Mean age was 22.5 years (SD=6.5), and 53.8% of the pregnant women had initiated prenatal care during the first trimester of pregnancy. Of the 130 patients interviewed, 96.9% had used at least one prescribed drug during pregnancy, with an average of 2.8 drugs per patient. The major classes prescribed were antianemics (55.1%), analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and antipyretics (19.0%) and anti-infectives (7.2%). 71.6% took two to four drugs. Only 19.2% of patients were considered adherent. The variables that showed a negative influence on adherence were: higher level of education, having one's own income, earlier prenatal care and previous abortion. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that, although most of the patients used prescribed drugs during pregnancy, the rate of medication adherence was low, which indicates the need for further investigation about the impact of non-adherence during pregnancy and its causes.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Self Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...