[THE FORMS OF DELIBERATION INVOLVED IN THE FIELD OF BIOETHICS: TECHNIQUE DELIBERATION AND ETHICS DELIBERATION]. / LES FORMES DE DÉLIBÉRATION IMPLIQUÉES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA BIOÉTHIQUE: LA DÉLIBÉRATION TECHNIQUE ET LA DÉLIBÉRATION ÉTHIQUE.

In this article the author examines the formulation of the problem of new technologies with their ethical limits and legal. To do this, in a first it is d'assess the contribuitions of the two most important contemporary philosophers who have treated this subject: Jürgen Habermas and Ronald Dworkin, while trying to put them into dialog with the one who has been one of the founders of l'classic ethics: Aristotle. Then, it tries to answer the question of how could we understand this notion that Dworkin nome "moral dislocation" between the random and the choice or well, as the appointed Habermas, "l'extension of the contingency". Finally, we questioned how the Aristotelian distinction between the technical deliberation and deliberative ethical-moral can contribute to a better understanding of the questions on the decisions and choices that will make the moral agents (such as patients or the judges), as well as those relating to the type of deliberation technique chosen by the doctor or by the health professional.

Desde la Ética a la Bioética / From Ethics to Bioethics

La Bioética está en permanente expansión en lo que se refiere a las nuevas cuestiones morales y jurídicas, pero aún es incipiente en su fundamentación filosófica. Se presenta como una ética nueva para un nuevo hombre, donde las nociones de la ética clásica parecen no justificar las exigencias de las nuevas cuestiones emergentes. Este trabajo aborda la cuestión de las nuevas tecnologías y de sus límites éticos y jurídicos. Se evalúan las contribuciones de dos de los más importantes jus-filósofos contemporáneos, Jürgen Habermas y Ronald Dworkin, estableciendo un posible diálogo entre ellos con aquél que fue uno de los fundadores de la ética clásica, Aristóteles (AU)

Bioethics is in constant expansion to new moral and legal issues, but it is still incipient in its philosophical grounds. It presents itself as a new ethic for a new man, where classical ethics´ notions seem not justify the demands of the new questions raised by bioethics. This paper addresses the issue of new technologies and their ethical and legal boundaries. Assesses the contributions of two of the most important contemporary philosophers, Jürgen Habermas and Ronald Dworkin, establishing a possible dialogue between them and one of the founders of classical ethics, Aristotle (AU)