ABSTRACT
Vertebral collapse is a common fracture associated with osteoporosis. Subsequent pain may be severe and often requires medications and bed rest. Several studies have suggested the use of calcitonin for the treatment of fracture pain. We sought to determine the analgesic efficacy of calcitonin for acute and chronic pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). We searched for randomized, placebo, and controlled trials that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of calcitonin for pain attributable to OVCFs. We performed meta-analyses to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) using a fixed or random effects model. The combined results from 13 trials (n = 589) determined that calcitonin significantly reduced the severity of acute pain in recent OVCFs. Pain at rest was reduced by week 1 [mean difference (MD) = -3.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.02 to -2.76), with continued improvement through 4 weeks. At week 4, the difference in pain scores with mobility was even greater (SMD = -5.99, 95% CI = -6.78 to -5.19). For patients with chronic pain, there was no statistical difference between groups while at rest; there was a small, statistically significant difference between groups while mobile at 6 months (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = -0.85 to -0.13, p = 0.008). Side effects were mild, with enteric disturbances and flushing reported most frequently. Although calcitonin has proven efficacy in the management of acute back pain associated with a recent OVCF, there is no convincing evidence to support the use of calcitonin for chronic pain associated with older fractures of the same origin.
Subject(s)
Back Pain/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Calcitonin/therapeutic use , Fractures, Compression/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/complications , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Back Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Humans , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of pregnancy-induced hypertension on fetal growth. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the basis of 16,936 births from January 1, 1989, through December 31, 1990, by means of data from a population-based perinatal database in Suzhou, China. Pregnancy-induced hypertension was classified as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or severe preeclampsia-eclampsia. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of the various types of pregnancy-induced hypertension on gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. RESULTS: Gestation was 0.6 week shorter in women with severe preeclampsia than in normotensive women (P <.01). However, the risk of preterm birth was not increased with any classification of pregnancy-induced hypertension (for severe preeclampsia: adjusted odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-3.47). After adjustment for duration of gestation and other confounders, preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia increased the risk of intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight. The adjusted odds ratios of low birth weight were 2.65 (1.73-4.39) for preeclampsia and 2.53 (1.19-4.93) for severe preeclampsia. However, the risk of low birth weight was not increased significantly for gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio 1.56 [1.00-2.41]). CONCLUSION: Preeclampsia increases the risk of intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight.