Trauma Registry Professionals' Perspectives on the Secondary Traumatic Stress Component of Compassion Fatigue: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Secondary traumatic stress and compassion fatigue have been studied among trauma clinicians yet have not been explored in trauma registry professionals (TRPs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue among TRPs. METHODS: A qualitative, phenomenological study was conducted to examine TRPs' experiences with the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue. The primary investigator assembled a multidisciplinary team of researchers, including nursing leadership, registry educators, mental health experts, and qualitative researchers. Two focus groups were held virtually in January 2021, using an interview guide designed by the research team. Participants were recruited via an email sent to a list of colleagues known to the research team from training classes held nationally and selected for their diverse clinical experiences, years in the role, demographic background, and trauma center representation. The recorded sessions were independently transcribed and analyzed by a five-member subgroup of the research team; the analysis concluded in December 2022. RESULTS: Nine TRPs participated in the focus groups. Participants came from Level I, II, and III adult and pediatric trauma centers and military centers. Four themes emerged from the data: disquieting and rewarding work, reactions and emotional responses, the influence of personal histories and background, and coping strategies. CONCLUSION: A qualitative analysis of focus group discussions revealed the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue is present in the TRP.

Community of trauma care partnering with stakeholders to improve injury outcomes: focus group analysis.

Introduction: Engaging trauma survivors/caregivers results in research findings that are more relevant to patients' needs and priorities. Although their perspectives increase research significance, there is a lack of understanding about how best to incorporate their insights. We aimed to capture stakeholder perspectives to ensure research is meaningful, respectful, and relevant to the injured patient and their caregivers. Methods: A multiphase, inductive exploratory qualitative study was performed, the first phase of which is described here. Virtual focus groups to elicit stakeholder perspectives and preferences were conducted across 19 trauma centers in the USA during 2022. Discussion topics were chosen to identify patients' motivation to join research studies, preferences regarding consent, suggestions for increasing diversity and access, and feelings regarding outcomes, efficacy, and exception from informed consent. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed to identify the range of perspectives expressed and any common themes that emerged. Results: Ten 90-minute focus groups included patients/caregiver (n=21/1) and researchers (n=14). Data analysis identified common themes emerging across groups. The importance of trust and preexisting relationships with the clinical care team were the most common themes across all groups. Conclusion: Our findings reveal common themes in preferences, motivations, and best practices to increase patient/caregiver participation in trauma research. The project's next phases are distribution of a vignette-based survey to establish broad stakeholder consensus; education and dissemination activities to share strategies that increase research engagement and relevance for patients; and the formation of a panel of patients to support future research endeavors. Level of evidence: Level IV.

How to say "I don't know": development and evaluation of workshops for medical students and surgical residents on communicating uncertainty using the ADAPT framework.

Purpose: Uncertainty, or the conscious awareness of having doubts, is pervasive in medicine, from differential diagnoses and the sensitivity of diagnostic tests, to the absence of a single known recovery path. While openness about uncertainty is necessary for shared decision-making and is a pillar of patient-centered care, it is a challenge to do so while preserving patient confidence. The authors' aim was to develop, pilot, and evaluate an uncertainty communication curriculum to prepare medical students and residents to confidently navigate such conversations. Methods: The authors developed ADAPT, a mnemonic framework to improve student comprehension and recall of the important steps in uncertainty disclosure: assess the patient's knowledge, disclose uncertainty directly, acknowledge patient emotions, plan next steps, and temper expectations. Using this framework, the authors developed, piloted, and evaluated an uncertainty communications course as part of an ongoing communication curriculum for second year medical students in 2020 and with surgical residents in 2021. Results: Learner confidence in uncertainty communication skills significantly increased post-class. Resident confidence in disclosing uncertainty was significantly correlated with observer ratings of their related communication skills during simulation. Students expressed positive experiences of the class, noting particular appreciation for the outline of steps included in the ADAPT framework, and the ability to observe a demonstration prior to practice. Conclusions: The ADAPT communication curriculum was effective at increasing learner confidence and performance in communicating uncertainty. More rigorous evaluation of the ADAPT protocol will be important in confirming its generalizability. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00075-4.

Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury carries major public health consequences, with patients suffering long-term disability with physiological, cognitive, and behavioral changes. Animal-assisted therapy, the use of human and animal bonds in goal-directed interventions, has been a suggested therapy, but its efficacy in acute brain injury outcomes remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess animal-assisted therapy's effects on cognitive outcome scores of hospitalized severe traumatic brain-injured patients. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, prospective trial was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and examined the effects of canine animal-assisted therapy on the Glasgow Coma Scale, Rancho Los Amigo Scale, and Levels of Command of adult severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Patients were randomized to receive animal-assisted therapy or usual standard of care. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to study group differences. RESULTS: Study patients (N = 70) received 151 sessions with a hander and dog (intervention, n = 38) and 156 without (control, n = 32) from a total of 25 dogs and nine handlers. When comparing the patients' response during hospitalization to animal-assisted therapy versus control, we controlled for sex, age, baseline Injury Severity Score, and corresponding enrollment score. Although there was no significant change in Glasgow Coma Score (p = .155), patients in the animal-assisted therapy group reported significantly higher standardized change in Rancho Los Amigo Scale (p = .026) and change commands (p < .001) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with traumatic brain injury receiving canine-assisted therapy demonstrated significant improvement compared with a control group.

Expediting Treatment of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department: Rapid Trauma Evaluation (RTE).

BACKGROUND: Criteria for trauma determination evolves. We developed/evaluated a Rapid Trauma Evaluation (RTE) process for a trauma patient subset not meeting preestablished trauma criteria. METHODS: Retrospective study (July 2019 - May 2020) for patients either > 65 years with ground level fall within 24 hours or in a motorcycle collision (MCC) arriving by EMS not meeting ACS trauma-criteria. RTE process was immediate evaluation by nurse/EMT, room placement, physician notification, undressing/gowning, vital signs, head-to-toe assessment, upgrade trauma status. Number/type of admissions, discharges, trauma upgrades, LOS obtained via trauma-registry and chart-review. For comparison, historic controls (HC) were used [all patients meeting RTE criteria seen in the ED prior to RTE (Apr- June 2019)]. RESULTS: The RTE cohort (n=755) was 77% falls,23% MCCs, median age 82 [IQR 74-88] years; 42% male-Among falls, 3.2% required a modified-upgrade; 0.7% full-upgrade, 55% admitted [29.4% trauma). HC (n=575) was 92.3% falls, 7.7% MCCs, median age 81 (IQR: 67-88) years, 40.5% males-57.4% admitted (22% trauma). RTE MCC median age 42 (IQR:30-49) years, 84.4% male- 21.9% were upgraded [(6 modified-trauma; 1 full-trauma; 43.8% admitted (85.7% trauma)]. HC MCC median age 29 (IQR: 23-41) years, 95.5% male, 54.5% admitted (75% trauma]. No difference on demographics, admissions or discharges between groups (P>0.05) except HC MCC was younger (P<0.005). RTE median LOS was shorter than HC [203 (IQR: 147-278) minutes vs. 286 (IQR: 205-392) minutes, P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients > 65 years with a ground level fall or in a MCC arriving via EMS not meeting ACS trauma criteria may benefit from RTE.

Virtual Communication Across Differences: Development of a Workshop on Managing Patient Bias.

PROBLEM: Despite the prevalence and detrimental effects of racial discrimination in American society and its health care systems, few medical schools have designed and implemented curricula to prepare medical students to respond to patient bias and racism. APPROACH: During the summer of 2020, a virtual communication class was designed that focused on training medical students in how to respond to patient bias and racism. Following brief didactics at the start of the session, students practiced scenarios with actors in small groups and received direct feedback from faculty. For each scenario, students were instructed to briefly gather a patient's history and schedule an appointment with the attending whose name triggered the patient to request an "American" provider. In one scenario, the patient's request was motivated by untreated hearing loss and difficulty understanding accents. In another, it was motivated by racist views toward foreign physicians. Students were to use motivational interviewing (MI) to uncover the reasoning behind the request and respond appropriately. Students assessed their presession and postsession confidence on 5 learning objectives that reflect successful communication modeled after MI techniques. OUTCOMES: Following the session, student skills confidence increased in exploring intentions and beliefs ( P = .026), navigating a conversation with a patient exhibiting bias ( P = .019) and using nonverbal skills to demonstrate empathy ( P = .031). Several students noted that this was their first exposure to the topic in a medical school course and first opportunity to practice these skills under supervision. NEXT STEPS: The experience designing and implementing this module preparing students in responding to patient bias and racism suggests that such an effort is feasible, affordable, and effective. With the clear need for such a program and positive impact on student confidence navigating these discussions, including such training in medical school programs appears feasible and is strongly encouraged.

Acceptability of Deimplementing High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Pediatric Bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis does not significantly improve clinical outcomes but can increase costs and intensive care unit use. Given widespread HFNC use, it is imperative to reduce use. However, there is limited information on key factors that affect deimplementation. To explore acceptability of HFNC deimplementation, perceptions of HFNC benefits, and identify barriers and facilitators to deimplementation. METHODS: We conducted a study of health care providers that included quantitative survey data supplemented by semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using univariate tests and thematic content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 152 (39%) providers completed the survey; 9 participated in interviews. Eighty-three (55%) providers reported feeling positively about deimplementing HFNC. Reports of feeling positively increased as perceived familiarity with evidence increased (P = .04). Physicians were more likely than nurses and respiratory therapists to report feeling positively (P = .003). Hospital setting and years of clinical experience were not associated with feeling positively (P = .98 and .55, respectively). One hundred (66%) providers attributed nonevidence-based clinical benefits to HFNC. Barriers to deimplementation included discomfort with not intervening, perception that HFNC helps, and variation in risk tolerance and clinical experience. Facilitators promoting deimplementation include staff education, a culture of safely doing less, and enhanced multidisciplinary communication. CONCLUSIONS: Deimplementation of HFNC in children with bronchiolitis is acceptable among providers. Hospital leaders should educate staff, create a culture for safely doing less, and enhance multidisciplinary communication to facilitate deimplementation.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS: Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION: This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

Implementation of a skills-based virtual communication curriculum for medical students interested in surgery.

Background: Communication skills are essential to providing patient-centered care. The need for standardized communication skills training is at the forefront of medical school and residency education. We aimed to design and implement a curriculum teaching virtual communications skills to medical students. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience and to offer guidance for training programs developing similar curricula in the future. Methods: The curriculum was presented in weekly modules over 5 weeks using Zoom technology. We focused on proven strategies for interacting with patients and other providers, adapted to a virtual platform. Skill levels during role-play were assessed by the Simulated Participants and students observing the simulation using the 14-item, physician specific Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). The primary outcome of the CAT is the percentage of "excellent" for each item ranked both years. Participants provided feedback on what worked well or how the module could be improved in open-ended responses. Results: Twenty-eight and 25 students registered for the course in Year 1 and Year 2, respectively. Students' post-session confidence in their ability to perform target skills was statistically higher than their pre-session scores in most sessions. Modules with the lowest pre-session confidence for both years were "Disclosing a Medical Error" and "Responding to Patient Bias." The mean percentage of students receiving "excellent" scores on individual CAT items ranged from 5 to 73% over the course of both years. Verbal and written feedback in Year 1 provided direction for the curriculum developers to improve the course in Year 2. Conclusions: Developing and implementing a new education curriculum is a complex process. We describe an intensive curriculum for medical students as we strive to allow students extra "clinical" time during COVID-related restriction. We believe continued focus on patient and family communication skills will enhance patient care. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00054-9.

Effect of Obesity on Early, In-Hospital Amputation Risk Following Popliteal Artery Injury Using an Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery injury is associated with a high risk of limb loss; identifying factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality is hampered by its rare occurrence and confounding factors. Anecdotal observations suggest delay in diagnosis of obese patients may be associated with amputation. We aimed to determine whether there is an increased risk of early amputation and if diagnosis is delayed in obese patients with popliteal artery injuries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data from 2013 to 2017. We extracted those sustaining popliteal artery injury, assigning obesity class based on body mass index. We included select demographic and clinical variables, using time to imaging as a surrogate for time to diagnosis. Statistical models were used to calculate the impact of obesity on amputation rates and time to diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 4803 popliteal artery injuries in the data set; 3289 met inclusion criteria. We calculated an 8.5% overall amputation rate, which was not significantly different between obese (N = 1305; 39.7%) and nonobese (N = 1984; 60.3%) patients. Statistical analysis identified peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and smoking as risk factors for amputation. Time to imaging was similar for obese and nonobese patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Analysis of NTDB data suggests that obesity is associated with neither increased early amputation rate nor longer time to imaging in patients with popliteal artery injury. However, our study suggests that underlying comorbidities of peripheral vascular disease and diabetes are associated with an increased risk for amputation in these patients.

Managing Patient Bias: Teaching Residents to Navigate Racism and Bias in the Workplace.

BACKGROUND: Racial inequities are infused within American society and healthcare systems; notable events in 2020 highlighted an urgent need for change. Many organizations were inspired to examine the impacts of systemic racism. The impact of physician bias on patient experiences and outcomes has been well documented; biased patient behavior is now becoming more openly discussed. In response to the current climate and painful effects of discrimination on healthcare and providers, we aimed to provide training for our surgical residents to more comfortably respond to bias in the workplace. METHODS: We designed and piloted a simulation-based communication module focused on managing bias with medical students. We incorporated feedback received from students, facilitators, faculty, and simulated patients (SPs) to create an anti-bias workshop for surgical residents. Additionally, we worked with the pediatric and emergency departments to develop training videos depicting bias incidents, standardize debriefing processes, and implement anti-bias workshops for their residencies. RESULTS: Twenty students participated in the medical student pilot session. Student confidence increased in target skills; many noted this was their first exposure to the topic in a medical school course, and first opportunity to practice these skills. Sixteen surgical residents participated in an in-person module; learners self-identifying as "completely confident" increased in number significantly for "determining whether to respond" (p = 0.023), "knowing how to ensure follow up" (p = 0.041), and "self-care following an event" (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Our low-cost, high-impact anti-bias module provided learners with tools and practice, suggesting that such an effort is feasible, affordable, and effective. Our interdepartmental trainings have inspired our institution to develop approved statements clinicians may use when responding to race-based discrimination; offering a uniform approach to race-based microaggression or abuse can create a shared mental model for all team members, especially for those vulnerable to biased comments.

Predictive Value of the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swab for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Trauma Patient.

Background: Many trauma centers have empiric treatment algorithms for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) treatment prior to culture results that include antibiotic agents for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage that can have adverse effects. This is the only study to evaluate risk factors and MRSA nasal swabs to risk-stratify trauma patients for MRSA VAP, thereby potentially limiting the need for empiric vancomycin. Patients and Methods: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study. Adult patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2013 and December 2017 who had a MRSA nasal swab and subsequently met criteria for VAP were included. Demographics, risk factors for MRSA pneumonia, and culture results were collected. Results: A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria. The negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swab at predicting subsequent MRSA pneumonia was 97%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 50.0%, 96.2%, and 44.4%, respectively. Smokers were more likely to develop MRSA pneumonia, odds ratio: 7.0 (p = 0.02). When considering non-smokers with a negative MRSA nasal swab, NPV was 100%. Conclusions: This is the only study to date that assesses the utility of MRSA nasal swab and risk factor data to guide empiric VAP antibiotic therapy in trauma patients. Smoking was found to be a risk factor for MRSA pneumonia. The use of MRSA nasal swabs in combination with smoking status to guide empiric use of MRSA coverage antibiotic agents is recommended because of a 100% NPV. When utilized, as many as 68% of patients may safely be spared MRSA coverage antibiotic agents and the related adverse effects.

Protocol Use in Surgical Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Protocols are common in intensive care, however the association between protocol prevalence and outcomes in surgical ICU patients is unclear. We hypothesized that ICUs in a multicenter database using more protocols had better outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 2-d prevalence study with 30-d follow up, on surgical and trauma patients in ICUs at 42 trauma centers. Use of forty clinical protocols was queried. Protocol prevalence was categorized by quartile into Low (first), Moderate (second and third), or High (fourth) use ICUs. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were ventilator, ICU, and hospital days, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, renal replacement, transfusion, and hospital-acquired infections. RESULTS: Data from 1044 surgical and trauma patients were analyzed. Protocol use was not different for "closed" (n = 20), "open" (n = 9), or "semi-open" (n = 13) ICUs (P= 0.20). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 8.4%, and not associated with number of protocols (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.98-1.03], P= 0.65). There was no statistically significant difference between High and Low use ICUs for ventilator days (OR 0.86; 0.52-1.43), tracheostomy (OR 0.8; 0.47-1.38), renal replacement therapy (OR 0.66; 0.04-9.82), transfusion (OR 0.95; 0.58-1.57), or hospital-acquired infections (OR 1.07; 0.67-1.7). Higher mortality was seen in open (versusclosed; OR 1.74 [1.05-2.89], P= 0.033), and surgical/trauma (versustrauma; OR 1.86 [1.33-2.61]; P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter observational study of surgical ICU patients, no association was found between the number of protocols used and patient outcomes.

Training Surgical Residents to Communicate with Their Patients: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication is critical in surgical practice and the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education requires a focus on interpersonal and communication skills. Absent a national communication skills curriculum for surgical residents, individual programs have designed and implemented their own curricula. This scoping review explores communication training in North American surgical residency programs. DESIGN: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, and included articles identified through searches of 6 publication databases conducted on June 25, 2019 and updated on April 2, 2020. Eligible studies described patient or family communication skills education for surgical residents in North America. Published abstracts were excluded. Article abstracts were screened by 2 reviewers. For articles meeting criteria, data on study setting, participants, curriculum design, educational techniques, and skills focus were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2724 articles were identified after removing duplicates; 84 articles were reviewed in full text. Thirty-three met study criteria including 4 from 2006 to 2009 and 29 after 2010. The most common skills education focused on breaking bad news, followed by a range of topics, such as empathy, end of life and/or palliative care discussions, medical error disclosure, shared decision making, and informed consent. Some of the training was part of larger curriculum including team training or professionalism. Over half of the studies involved general surgery learners. The most common form of education included didactics followed by practice with peers or simulated patients. Only half of the programs described curricula involving multiple training sessions which is important for ongoing development and skill reinforcement. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication skills are important, necessary, and increasingly incorporated into surgical training programs. While the literature is expanding, few surgical residency programs have described communication curricula. This review serves as a guide for programs interested in developing their own communication curricula for surgical residents.

Building Rapport and Earning the Surgical Patient's Trust in the Era of Social Distancing: Teaching Patient-Centered Communication During Video Conference Encounters to Medical Students.

BACKGROUND: Effective physician communication improves care, and many medical schools and residency programs have adopted communication focused curricula. The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted the doctor-patient communication paradigm with the rapid adoption of video-based medical appointments by the majority of the medical community. The pandemic has also necessitated a sweeping move to online learning, including teaching and facilitating the practice of communication skills remotely. We aimed to identify effective techniques for surgeons to build relationships during a video consult, and to design and pilot a class that increased student skill in communicating during a video consult. METHODS: Fourth-year medical students matched into a surgical internship attended a 2-hour class virtually. The class provided suggestions for building rapport and earning trust with patients and families by video, role play sessions with a simulated patient, and group debriefing and feedback. A group debriefing generated lessons learned and best practices for telemedicine communication in surgery. RESULTS: Students felt the class introduced new skills and reinforced current ones; most reported higher self-confidence in target communication skills following the module. Students were particularly appreciative of opportunity for direct observation of skills and immediate faculty feedback, noting that the intimate setting was unique and valuable. Several elements of virtual communications required increased focus to communicate empathy and concern. Proper lighting and positioning relative to the camera were particularly important and body movement required "narration" to minimize misinterpretation. A patient's distress was more difficult to interpret; asking direct questions was recommended to understand the patient's emotional state. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to teach video-conference communication skills to enable surgical teams to build rapport in this distinct form of consultation. Our training plan appears effective at engaging learners and improving skills and confidence, and identifies areas of focus when teaching virtual communication skills.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Injury Prevention Programs: A Qualitative Exploration and Model Development.

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma mandated implementation of injury prevention programs as a requirement for Level I and II trauma center designation. Little is known about the factors that facilitate or create barriers to establishing evidence-based injury prevention program implementation. The purpose of this research is to generate hypotheses regarding processes used to implement injury prevention programs at trauma centers, identify the factors that facilitate and serve as a barrier to implementation, and develop a model reflecting these factors and relationships. METHODS: This is a qualitative study of injury prevention programs at trauma centers. Study participants were chosen from 24 sites representing trauma centers of different patient volumes, geographic regions, and settings in the United States. Subjects participated in phone interviews based on guides developed from pilot interviews with prevention coordinators. Transcribed interviews from eight subjects were analyzed using a system of member checking to code; analysis informed the identification of factors that influence the establishment of evidence-based injury prevention programs. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from the data analysis: external factors, internal organizational factors, program capacity, program selection, and program success. Analysis revealed that successful program implementation was related to supportive leaders and collaborative, interdepartmental relationships. Additional themes indicated that while organizations were motivated primarily by verification requirements (external factor), strong institutional leadership (internal factor) was lacking. Employee readiness (program capacity) was hindered by limited training opportunities, and programs were often chosen (selection) based on implementation ease rather than evidence base or local data. CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis reveals five emerging themes of program implementation; using these data, we suggest an initial model of barriers and facilitators for implementing evidence-based injury prevention programs that could serve as the springboard for additional research involving a larger representative sample.

Family Survey of Understanding and Communication of Patient Prognosis in the Intensive Care Unit: Identifying Training Opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Family members making medical decisions for critically ill patients depend on surgeons' high-quality communication. We aimed to assess family experience of communication in the trauma intensive care unit (TICU), identify opportunities for improvement, and tailor resident communication training to address deficiencies. DESIGN: We designed surveys based on our Conceptual Model of Surgeon Communication and Family Understanding, using items from previously validated tools to assess (1) family well-being, experiences of care, access to information, and assessment of patient condition and prognosis; and (2) surgeon and nursing assessment of patient condition and prognosis. SETTING: Level I TICU in an independent academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult family members of patients hospitalized in the TICU > 24 hours; 88 families, 22 residents, 9 attendings, 81 nurses completed surveys on 78 unique patients. RESULTS: Family indicated: (1) they had easy access to medical information (91%); (2) the doctors (89%) and nurses (99%) listened carefully (p = 0.013); (3) they were included in morning rounds (80%); and (4) the doctors (91%) and nurses (98%) explained things well (p = 0.041). Family-surgeon agreement regarding the patient's condition and chance of cure was poor (28%) and fair (58%) respectively; families were typically more pessimistic than the surgeon regarding the patient's condition (65%), and more optimistic regarding chance of cure (26%). Residents cited mentors and skills practice with simulated patients as most influential training elements on communication style. CONCLUSIONS: Although families reported high-quality communication with the surgical team and rated physicians well in attributes related to trust, significant discordance in surgeon-family understanding of the patient's condition and prognosis persisted. This may be related to physician difficulty communicating complex information, or a family member's distress resulting in cognitive compromise, coupled with coping through hope and optimism. We recommend ongoing communication training for residents, skills practice for mentors, and open communication between nursing and physicians to optimize family information access.

Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. METHODS: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. RESULTS: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability.

Dimensional Characterization of the Human Cervical Interlaminar Space as a Guide for Safe Application of Minimally Invasive Dilators.

BACKGROUND: The risk of interlaminar passage of a dilator into the cervical spinal canal in minimally invasive approaches is currently unknown. Among the various anthropometric data reported in the literature, there is no report of the interlaminar dimensions in the cervical spine. OBJECTIVE: To report the cervical interlaminar dimensions in neutral, flexion, and extension. METHODS: A total of 8 spines were sectioned into cervical (C2-T1) segments. Digitized coordinate data defining the locations and movements of chosen anatomic points on the laminar edges at a given spinal level were used to compute the dimensions during a static neutral posture, flexion, and extension positions to mimic the positions during surgery. Interlaminar dimensions were averaged and categorized for each vertebral level and spinal posture. RESULTS: Based on the reported measurements, the smallest diameter dilator in commonly used dilator sets has the potential to traverse the interlaminar space at all levels in flexion. In a neutral posture, the average interlaminar distance at C2-3, C6-7, and C7-T1 was still greater than 2.0 mm, the smallest diameter of the initial dilator. The largest interlaminar distance was at C6-7 in flexion (7.68 ± 1.60 mm). CONCLUSION: Because dilators pass directly onto the cervical lamina without visualization of the midline structures, the interlaminar distances have increased relevance in the minimally invasive cervical approaches of foraminotomy and laminectomy. The data in this report demonstrate the theoretical risk of interlaminar passage with small diameter dilators in posterior minimally invasive approaches to the cervical spine.