Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ACS ES T Eng ; 4(6): 1492-1506, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899163

ABSTRACT

As water treatment technology has improved, the amount of available process data has substantially increased, making real-time, data-driven fault detection a reality. One shortcoming of the fault detection literature is that methods are usually evaluated by comparing their performance on hand-picked, short-term case studies, which yields no insight into long-term performance. In this work, we first evaluate multiple statistical and machine learning approaches for detrending process data. Then, we evaluate the performance of a PCA-based fault detection approach, applied to the detrended data, to monitor influent water quality, filtrate quality, and membrane fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane system for indirect potable reuse. Based on two short case studies, the adaptive lasso detrending method is selected, and the performance of the multivariate approach is evaluated over more than a year. The method is tested for different sets of three critical tuning parameters, and we find that for long-term, autonomous monitoring to be successful, these parameters should be carefully evaluated. However, in comparison with industry standards of simpler, univariate monitoring or daily pressure decay tests, multivariate monitoring produces substantial benefits in long-term testing.

2.
ACS ES T Water ; 4(3): 913-924, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482339

ABSTRACT

Unsupervised process monitoring for fault detection and data cleaning is underdeveloped for municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) due to the complexity and volume of data produced by sensors, equipment, and control systems. The goal of this work is to extensively test and tune an unsupervised process monitoring method that can promptly identify faults in a full-scale decentralized WWTP prior to significant system changes. Adaptive dynamic principal component analysis (AD-PCA) is a dimension reduction method modified to address autocorrelation and nonstationarity in multivariate processes and is evaluated in this work for its ability to continuously detect drift, shift, and spike faults. For spike faults, univariate drift faults, and multivariate shift faults, implementing AD-PCA on data that are subset by treatment processes and operating states with significant differences in covariates and whose model parameters use week-long training windows, moderate cumulative variance, and a high threshold for detection was found to detect faults prior to existing operational thresholds. To improve the consistency with which the AD-PCA method detects out-of-control conditions in real time, additional work is needed to remove outliers prior to model fitting and to detect multivariate drift faults in which the covariates change slowly.

3.
Water Res ; 157: 498-513, 2019 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30981980

ABSTRACT

Recent advancements in data-driven process control and performance analysis could provide the wastewater treatment industry with an opportunity to reduce costs and improve operations. However, big data in wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) is widely underutilized, due in part to a workforce that lacks background knowledge of data science required to fully analyze the unique characteristics of WWTP. Wastewater treatment processes exhibit nonlinear, nonstationary, autocorrelated, and co-correlated behavior that (i) is very difficult to model using first principals and (ii) must be considered when implementing data-driven methods. This review provides an overview of data-driven methods of achieving fault detection, variable prediction, and advanced control of WWTP. We present how big data has been used in the context of WWTP, and much of the discussion can also be applied to water treatment. Due to the assumptions inherent in different data-driven modeling approaches (e.g., control charts, statistical process control, model predictive control, neural networks, transfer functions, fuzzy logic), not all methods are appropriate for every goal or every dataset. Practical guidance is given for matching a desired goal with a particular methodology along with considerations regarding the assumed data structure. References for further reading are provided, and an overall analysis framework is presented.


Subject(s)
Wastewater , Water Purification , Fuzzy Logic , Neural Networks, Computer , Waste Disposal, Fluid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...