Ultrasound Features of the Posterior Tibialis Tendon and Peroneus Brevis Tendon Entheses: Comparison Study Between Healthy Adults and Those With Inflammatory Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Limited literature exists on the sonographic appearance of the posterior tibialis tendon (PTT) and the peroneus brevis tendon (PBT) entheses. We determined the anatomic features and best imaging techniques of normal PTT and PBT using musculoskeletal ultrasound and compared these findings to subjects with inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Adult subjects were enrolled as healthy controls (HCs), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, or spondyloarthropathy (SpA) patients. Bilateral PTT and PBT entheses were imaged longitudinally, comparing 2 angles of insonation: perpendicular to the skin surface and 45° cephalad. Images were scored on semiquantitative scales assessing pathology. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were enrolled (37 HC, 21 RA, and 20 SpA). Complete enthesis visualization was achieved more frequently in the perpendicular than in the cephalad view for the PBT (76.3% versus 58.7%), but more frequently in the cephalad view for the PTT (58.0% versus 19.6%). RA and SpA subjects had higher rates of PTT fiber disruption (P < 0.001), PTT tenosynovial effusion (P < 0.001), and Doppler signal (P < 0.001) than HCs. No significant differences existed at the PBT enthesis. In multivariate analysis, RA and SpA subjects were found to be 5.1 times (P < 0.001) and 3.6 times (P < 0.001) more likely to exhibit ultrasound-detected pathology, respectively, than HCs. CONCLUSION: The perpendicular transducer aim is optimal for imaging the PBT, while the cephalad transducer orientation was more effective for evaluation of the PTT. Unlike distal PBT imaging, PTT imaging distinguished healthy and disease states, with both RA and SpA patients showing features of PTT enthesopathy. Distal PTT imaging is a useful technique for musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Necrotizing Autoimmune Myopathy: A Unique Subset of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.

Necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM) is a recently recognized entity within the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Diagnosis critically rests on histopathologic demonstration of macrophage predominant myocyte destruction, with few to no lymphocytes. We report our experience with identifying and treating this subset of inflammatory myositis, highlighting the importance of muscle biopsy in diagnosis, association with statin use and malignancy, and challenges of therapy.We present 3 cases that presented to 2 hospitals within our academic system in calendar year 2014 with acute/subacute onset of profound proximal muscle weakness and markedly elevated creatine kinase levels. All patients had been exposed to statins for varying periods. While each electromyogram (EMG) study showed changes with a diffuse inflammatory myopathy, it was not until muscle biopsy was performed when histopathologic features consistent with NAM solidified the diagnosis in all 3 cases. While high-dose glucocorticoids helped provide some degree of improvement in symptoms, none of our cases returned to their preillness baseline independent functioning. Additional immunosuppressive therapy was considered in each case but limited because of comorbidities.These cases demonstrate the importance of pursuing muscle biopsy in all patients with proximal muscle weakness and markedly elevated creatine kinase levels. While symptoms appear consistent with polymyositis, only through muscle biopsy can the diagnosis of NAM be made. Statins have been implicated in NAM, acting through an antibody-dependent mechanism. Combination immunosuppressive therapy has been advocated, but our patient's comorbidities precluded safe use of medications beyond glucocorticoids.

Checklists change communication about key elements of patient care.

BACKGROUND: Combat casualty care is distributed across professions and echelons of care. Communication within it is fragmented, inconsistent, and prone to failure. Daily checklists used during intensive care unit (ICU) rounds have been shown to improve compliance with evidence-based practices, enhance communication, promote consistency of care, and improve outcomes. Checklists are criticized because it is difficult to establish a causal link between them and their effect on outcomes. We investigated how checklists used during ICU rounds affect communication. METHODS: We conducted this project in two military ICUs (burn and surgical/trauma). Checklists contained up to 21 questions grouped according to patient population. We recorded which checklist items were discussed during rounds before and after implementation of a "must address" checklist and compared the frequency of discussing items before checklist prompting. RESULTS: Patient discussions addressed more checklist items before prompting at the end of the 2-week evaluation compared with the 2-week preimplementation period (surgical trauma ICU, 36% vs. 77%, p < 0.0001; burn ICU, 47% vs. 72 %, p < 0.001). Most items were addressed more frequently in both ICUs after implementation. Key items such as central line removal, reduction of laboratory testing, medication reconciliation, medication interactions, bowel movements, sedation holidays, breathing trials, and lung protective ventilation showed significant improvements. CONCLUSION: Checklists modify communication patterns. Improved communication facilitated by checklists may be one mechanism behind their effectiveness. Checklists are powerful tools that can rapidly alter patient care delivery. Implementing checklists could facilitate the rapid dissemination of clinical practice changes, improve communication between echelons of care and between individuals involved in patient care, and reduce missed information.

Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children.

PURPOSE: To test visual field thresholds of normal children with frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry to quantify testing times and reliability characteristics in a pediatric population and to determine whether current methods of stratifying adult threshold values need revision for children. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Ninety-four children, ages 5 to 17 years, were recruited from local pediatric clinics and the general community and were tested at one center. Children likely to have abnormal visual fields or abnormal test taking ability because of ophthalmic, neurologic, or behavioral problems were excluded. Children were asked to perform a threshold FDT visual field with each of their eyes. Threshold results were gathered, analyzed, and compared with the standards that have been established for tests in adults. Results were validated by testing a further 72 children, with the same protocol, at a different center. RESULTS: For children older than 14 years, threshold mean deviation values were within normal limits according to the adult normative database that is used currently in FDT perimetry. Below 15 years of age, mean deviations for normal children decreased with decreasing age. The best linear fit was given by a mean deviation of -11.43 +/- 0.82 dB x age (R2 = 0.18; P < 10(-5)). CONCLUSION: This research establishes a normative model for pediatric visual field testing with FDT and, by a comparison of threshold results for normal children to established adult norms, provides evidence that parameters for normal sensitivity must be revised for children younger than 15 years.

Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of false-positive (FP) response errors on mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT), and test duration in the Humphrey Field Analyzer's (HFA II) Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA). METHODS: Five individuals with glaucoma (ages 52, 63, 69, 77, and 78 years) and five individuals with normal, healthy eyes (ages 25, 34, 43, 45, and 52 years), participated in the study. Each subject was experienced in automated perimetry and performed multiple, monocular baseline SITA-standard (SITA-S) 24-2 visual field tests. In addition, normal subjects completed SITA-S 24-2 field examinations in which known frequencies of FP error were introduced (0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, or 33% frequency). Likewise, the subjects with glaucoma completed visual field examinations with 0%, 20%, and 33% error introduced during the test. RESULTS: Reported FP errors were significantly lower than the introduced frequency of error. The SITA algorithm more accurately identified FP errors when the MD and PSD diverged from normal. Test duration increased as introduced error frequencies increased. The Statpac single-field analyses indicated that two thirds of the tests with introduced errors produced a "low-patient-reliability" determination. CONCLUSIONS: HFA II SITA-S underestimates patients' FP errors, particularly among normal patients. High FP error frequencies can have adverse effects on MD and PSD, leading clinicians and researchers to an inaccurate determination of the amount and severity of visual field loss.