Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 27(9): 1083-1090, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29853481

ABSTRACT

Background: Biomarkers of tobacco exposure have a central role in studies of tobacco use and nicotine intake. The most significant exposure markers are nicotine itself and its metabolites in urine. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the performance of laboratories conducting these biomarker measurements.Methods: This report presents the results from a method performance study involving 11 laboratories from 6 countries that are currently active in this area. Each laboratory assayed blind replicates of seven human urine pools at various concentrations on three separate days. The samples included five pools blended from smoker and nonsmoker urine sources, and two additional blank urine samples fortified with pure nicotine, cotinine, and hydroxycotinine standards. All laboratories used their own methods, and all were based on some form of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Overall, good agreement was found among the laboratories in this study. Intralaboratory precision was good, and in the fortified pools, the mean bias observed was < + 3.5% for nicotine, approximately 1.2% for hydroxycotinine, and less than 1% for cotinine (1 outlier excluded in each case). Both indirect and direct methods for analyzing the glucuronides gave comparable results.Conclusions: This evaluation indicates that the experienced laboratories participating in this study can produce reliable and comparable human urinary nicotine metabolic profiles in samples from people with significant recent exposure to nicotine.Impact: This work supports the reliability and agreement of an international group of established laboratories measuring nicotine and its metabolites in urine in support of nicotine exposure studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(9); 1083-90. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/urine , Cotinine/analogs & derivatives , Glucuronides/urine , Nicotine/urine , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/urine , Cotinine/urine , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , United States/epidemiology
2.
Biomarkers ; 19(4): 291-301, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24754403

ABSTRACT

The urinary metabolites 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid and 4-aminobiphenyl have been correlated with tobacco smoke exposure. Similarly, 2-cyanoethylvaline and 4-aminobiphenyl haemoglobin adducts have been used as biomarkers of effective dose for the exposure to acrylonitrile and 4-aminobiphenyl, respectively. Each pair of biomarkers is derived from the same parent chemical; however, the correlation between the urinary and the haemoglobin biomarkers has not been investigated. Using clinical study samples, we report a weak correlation between urinary and haemoglobin biomarkers due to different accumulation and elimination rates. Time course analysis showed that a reduction in exposure was paralleled by a delayed reduction in haemoglobin adducts.


Subject(s)
Acrylonitrile/urine , Aminobiphenyl Compounds/urine , Biomarkers/urine , Smoking/urine , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
3.
BMC Res Notes ; 4: 391, 2011 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21985092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have been used extensively in clinical studies to assess toxicant exposure in smokers and non-smokers and have recently been used in the evaluation of novel tobacco products. The urinary metabolite 3-HPMA, a metabolite of the major tobacco smoke toxicity contributor acrolein, is one example of a biomarker used to measure exposure to tobacco smoke. A number of laboratories have developed liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based methods to measure urinary 3-HPMA; however, it is unclear to what extent the data obtained by these different laboratories are comparable. FINDINGS: This report describes an inter-laboratory comparison carried out to evaluate the comparability of 3-HPMA measurement between four laboratories. A common set of spiked and authentic smoker and non-smoker urine samples were used. Each laboratory used their in-house LC-MS/MS method and a common internal standard. A comparison of the repeatability ('r'), reproducibility ('R'), and coefficient of variation for 3-HPMA demonstrated that within-laboratory variation was consistently lower than between-laboratory variation. The average inter-laboratory coefficient of variation was 7% for fortified urine samples and 16.2% for authentic urine samples. Together, this represents an inter-laboratory variation of 12.2%. CONCLUSION: The results from this first inter-laboratory comparison for the measurement of 3-HPMA in urine demonstrate a reasonably good consensus between laboratories. However, some consistent measurement biases were still observed between laboratories, suggesting that additional work may be required to further reduce the inter-laboratory coefficient of variation.

4.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 12(2): 105-16, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20026503

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been reported that adult smokers (AS) may be considering smokeless tobacco products as an alternative to smoking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change in exposure in AS using Marlboro snus (MSNUS) (a tobacco pouch product in test market in June 2007). METHODS: AS were randomized into the following groups--CS: subjects (n = 30) continue smoking their own brand; DU: subjects (n = 60) reduced their daily cigarette consumption by >or=50% and were allowed to use MSNUS; SN: subjects (n = 15) stopped smoking their cigarettes but were allowed to use MSNUS; NT: subjects (n = 15) were not allowed to use any tobacco products for the entire duration of the 8-day study. Biomarkers of smoke exposure (BOE) measured at baseline and postbaseline were 24-hr urinary excretion of metabolites of N-nitrosamines, nicotine (urine and plasma), aromatic amines, benzene, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; urine mutagenicity; and carboxyhemoglobin at various timepoints. RESULTS: Statistically significant (p < .05) reductions in all the urinary BOE were observed in the DU group compared with the CS group. After correcting for the residual effect, a proportionate reduction (approximately 50%) in most of the biomarkers was observed. Even larger reductions, similar to the NT group, were observed in the SN group. DISCUSSION: The proportionate reduction in exposure when reducing the number of cigarettes by 50% and using MSNUS, under the consumption patterns observed, suggest that the AS did not appear to alter their smoking behavior. The added exposure from MSNUS usage in this group was minimal. The AS sustained substantial reductions in exposure when using MSNUS exclusively.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Nicotine/urine , Smoke/analysis , Smoking/urine , Tobacco, Smokeless/analysis , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Biomarkers/urine , Butadienes/urine , Carbon Monoxide/urine , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrosamines/urine , Pyrenes/analysis , Young Adult
5.
Toxicol Lett ; 173(2): 101-6, 2007 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17716838

ABSTRACT

Urinary excretion of nicotine and its five major metabolites (nicotine-N-glucuronide, cotinine, cotinine-N-glucuronide, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-O-glucuronide), expressed as nicotine equivalents (NE), has been used as a biomarker of smoking-related nicotine exposure. In this open-label, single center study, we investigated the relationship between nicotine retention from smoking and urinary excretion of NE in adult smokers. After a 4-day washout period, 16 adult male smokers smoked 6 cigarettes per day for four consecutive days according to three predefined smoking patterns: no inhalation (Pattern A), normal inhalation (Pattern B), and deep inhalation (Pattern C). The amount of nicotine retained in the respiratory tract during smoking was estimated from the difference between the amounts of nicotine delivered and exhaled. The daily excretion of urinary NE was measured in 24h urine samples by LC-MS/MS. The mean (+/-S.D.) amount of nicotine retained was 0.126+/-0.167, 0.960+/-0.214, and 1.070+/-0.223mg/cig for Patterns A, B, and C, respectively. The mean (+/-S.D.) relative retention (the amount retained relative to the amount delivered) was 11.2+/-14.7%, 98.0+/-1.6%, and 99.6+/-0.3% for Patterns A, B, and C, respectively. On the fourth day of smoking, an average of 86+/-20% of the total daily amount of retained nicotine was recovered as NE in 24h urine. Nicotine equivalents was treated as a single component and the data was described by a first-order elimination pharmacokinetic model which assumed instantaneous input and distribution. Based on this model, the elimination half-life of NE was 19.4+/-2.6h, and the NE excretion had reached approximately 96% of the steady state levels by Day 4. Our results suggest that most of the nicotine inhaled from a cigarette is retained (> or =98%) in the lung, and at steady state, daily urine NE excretion reflects approximately 90% of the retained nicotine dose from cigarette smoking.


Subject(s)
Inhalation , Lung/metabolism , Nicotine/pharmacokinetics , Nicotine/urine , Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Nicotinic Agonists/urine , Smoking/metabolism , Adult , Biomarkers/urine , Biotransformation , Breath Tests , Chromatography, Liquid , Cotinine/analogs & derivatives , Cotinine/pharmacokinetics , Cotinine/urine , Glucuronates/pharmacokinetics , Glucuronates/urine , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Models, Biological , Nicotine/analogs & derivatives , Smoking/physiopathology , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
6.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 385(5): 975-81, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16791581

ABSTRACT

A modified interval hypothesis testing procedure based on paired-sample analysis is described, as well as its application in testing equivalence between two bioanalytical laboratories or two methods. This testing procedure has the advantage of reducing the risk of wrongly concluding equivalence when in fact two laboratories or two methods are not equivalent. The advantage of using paired-sample analysis is that the test is less confounded by the intersample variability than unpaired-sample analysis when incurred biological samples with a wide range of concentrations are included in the experiments. Practical aspects including experimental design, sample size calculation and power estimation are also discussed through examples.


Subject(s)
Research Design , Laboratories
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...