Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Injury ; 43(6): 712-7, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22348953

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Any torsion experienced at a fracture site will directly translate into shearing forces and has been regarded as detrimental to healing. The purpose of this study was to determine which plating system currently on the market controls torsional forces about comminuted olecranon fractures most effectively. METHODS: Five olecranon plates (Acumed, Synthes-SS, Synthes-Ti, ITS/US Implants and Zimmer) were implanted to stabilise a simulated comminuted fracture pattern in 50 fresh-frozen, cadaveric elbows. All specimens were evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to determine bone density. Three-dimensional displacement analysis was conducted to assess fragment motion through physiologic cyclic arcs of motion. The specimens were cycled through progressive physiologic loads (0.18-5.6 kg). Movements of the fragments were statistically compared amongst the different implants using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc comparisons with a critical significance level of α=0.05. RESULTS: DXA bone mineral densities (BMDs) ranged from 0.465 to 0.927, with an average of 0.714. The Acumed, Synthes-SS, Synthes-Ti and Zimmer plates allowed <1° of torsion up to 1.6 kg of load. The differences between these plates at this load were not statistically significant. The ITS/US Implants plate, however, allowed significantly more torsion above loads of 2.6 kg (p=0.045) compared with all other plates. The ITS/US Implants plate allowed over 2° of torsion at 2.6 kg (p=0.012), and nearly 3° at 3.6 kg (p=0.045). The Zimmer plate consistently allowed more torsion than the Acumed plate or either of the Synthes plates, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Regardless of which olecranon plate is used, the authors recommend limiting postoperative rehabilitation loads to below 1.6 kg in an effort to minimise the detrimental effects of torsion on healing. If loads over 1.6 kg are anticipated, the authors recommend the use of the Acumed plate or either of the Synthes plates.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Olecranon Process/injuries , Torsion, Mechanical , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Anatomic
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 25(5): 306-11, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine if recent innovations in olecranon plates have any advantages in stabilizing osteoporotic olecranon fractures. METHODS: Five olecranon plates (Acumed, Synthes-SS, Synthes-Ti, US Implants/ITS, and Zimmer) were implanted to stabilize a simulated comminuted fracture pattern in 30 osteoporotic cadaveric elbows. Specimens were randomized by bone mineral density per dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan. Three-dimensional displacement analysis was conducted to assess fragment motion through physiological cyclic arcs of motion and failure loading, which was statistically compared using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc comparisons with a critical significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS: Bone mineral density ranged from 0.546 g/cm to 0.878 g/cm with an average of 0.666 g/cm. All implants limited displacement of the fragments to less than 3 mm until sudden, catastrophic failure as the bone of the proximal fragment pulled away from the implant. The maximum load sustained by all osteoporotic specimens ranged from 1.6 kg to 6.6 kg with an average of 4.4 kg. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of cycles survived and maximum loads sustained. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic physiological loading of osteoporotic olecranon fracture fixation resulted in sudden, catastrophic failure of the bone-implant interface rather than in gradual implant loosening. Recent plate innovations such as locking plates and different screw designs and positions appear to offer no advantages in stabilizing osteoporotic olecranon fractures. Surgeons may be reassured that the current olecranon plates will probably adequately stabilize osteoporotic fractures for early motion in the early postoperative period, but not for heavy activities such as those that involve over 4 kg of resistance.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Olecranon Process/surgery , Osteoporosis/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biocompatible Materials , Cadaver , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Elbow Joint/surgery , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/complications , Humans , Male , Materials Testing , Middle Aged , Olecranon Process/injuries , Osteoporosis/complications , Prosthesis Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...