Outcome differences between recanalized malignant central airway obstruction from endoluminal disease versus extrinsic compression.

We compared the outcome of Nd:YAG laser therapy with stent placement for malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) at our center over a 10-year period. This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing Nd:YAG laser therapy or self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement for malignant CAO between November 2007 and October 2017. Seventy-two patients were recanalized for malignant CAO. The median (range) age was 63 (23-86) years, with 49 (68%) males. Patients underwent either laser therapy alone (N = 36), stent placement alone (N = 30), or both (N = 6). The wavelength of Nd:YAG laser used was 1064 nm, and median (range) laser energy used was 25 (15-35) W, in 377 (115-1107) pulses. Fifty-one (71%) patients died with median survival of 7.2 months. In subgroup analysis, 21 (58.3%) vs. 25 (83.3%), p = 0.03 patients died in the "laser resection" vs. "stent placement" group with longer median survival of 12.4 months in the former vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.0004 in the later. Esophageal cancer and left main bronchus involvement were significantly more common (10 (33.3%) vs. 0, p = 0.0001, and 16 (53.3%) vs. 8 (22.2%), p = 0.01), in the stent placement vs. laser resection group, respectively. Trachea or main bronchi involvement and respiratory failure on presentation requiring mechanical ventilation correlated with poorer survival. The immediate restoration of luminal patency, complication rate, and 30-day mortality was similar among the two groups. The median (range) energy used for laser therapy was 25 (15-35) W. Median of 377 pulses was used for the duration of 287.5 s. The results were compared using a Wilcoxon two-sample test, and Fischer exact test with p values considered indicative of a significant difference if less than 0.05. In patients requiring recanalization of malignant CAO, the extrinsic compression from esophageal cancer, trachea or main bronchi involvement, respiratory failure on presentation requiring mechanical ventilation, and stent placement correlated with poorer survival. Interventional pulmonology training program should emphasize on dedicated training in laser therapy as it is associated with improved survival.

Evaluation of pulmonary nodules in Asian population.

BACKGROUND: American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) provides guidelines to manage pulmonary nodules. Pulmonary nodules however can be malignant or benign. Similar incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and lung cancer in Asian countries raises concern over the relevance of suggested guidelines in Asian population. There is little data on the pattern of clinical practice in the management of pulmonary nodules in Asian country (Singapore). Our study describes the current pattern of clinical practice in this area highlighting the variation in practice and discussing the potential reasons. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 2010. RESULTS: Sixty nodules were identified in 32 patients. Nodules were detected incidentally on routine imaging in 7 (21.9%) patients. TB contact tracing and pre-employment screening were common ways by which nodules were detected incidentally. Over one third (37.5%) were non-smokers. Majority of nodules were located in the upper lobes of right and left lung followed by right lower lobe (RLL). Only few patients 8 (25%) had positron emission tomography (PET) scan for staging purposes. There were no difference in survival between patients who presented with single, 747 (range, 25-1,840) days vs. multiple nodules 928 (range, 30-2,572) days, P=0.26. In a retrospective analysis of malignancy risk with the probability calculator, 62.5% patients were at low-moderate risk whilst 32.5% were at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical practice of managing pulmonary nodules in Asian population differs from ACCP guidelines. None of the patient had pre-test probability calculated, and few had PET scan. This is because upper lobe predominance of lung cancer is identical to TB, non-smoking history does not have any weight in discounting malignancy risk where many of the Asian lung cancer patients are non-smokers, and the local endemicity of TB and its confounding effect on radiological findings of CT scan and PET scan.

Polymorphisms in inflammatory pathway genes, host factors and lung cancer risk in Chinese female never-smokers.

Inflammation appears to be important in lung carcinogenesis among smokers, but its role among never-smokers is not well established. We hypothesized that inflammatory medical conditions and gene polymorphisms interact to increase lung cancer risk in never-smokers. We interviewed 433 Singaporean female never-smoker lung cancer patients and 1375 hospital controls, and evaluated six polymorphisms in the interleukin 1-ß, interleukin 6 (IL6), cyclooxygenase-2, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and interleukin 1-ß receptor antagonist (IL1RN) genes. Tuberculosis was associated with a non-significant elevated risk of lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-2.62]. There was no effect of asthma, atopy or chronic productive cough individually. However, the presence of one or more of these conditions (asthma, cough or atopy) increased risk (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.15-4.38) in individuals possessing the T/T genotype at interleukin 1-ß -31T/C, but not in those possessing the C/T (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.51-1.57) or C/C genotypes (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.27-1.27), and in individuals having the *2 variable number of tandem repeat allele of IL1RN [OR 5.09 (1.39-18.67)], but not in those without (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.63-1.35). The IL6-634 G allele increased the risk of lung cancer (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.07-1.94). Lung cancer risk also increased with the number of polymorphism sites where at least 1 'risk' allele was present [interleukin 1-ß -31T/C (T allele), IL1RN (*2 allele) and IL6-634C/G (G allele)] among those with asthma, cough or atopy (Ptrend 0.001) but not in those without (Ptrend 0.47). Our results suggest that the effect of inflammatory medical conditions on lung cancer in never-smokers is modulated by host genetic susceptibility and will need to be confirmed in other studies conducted in similar populations.

Lung cancer in Chinese women: evidence for an interaction between tobacco smoking and exposure to inhalants in the indoor environment.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data suggest that Chinese women have a high incidence of lung cancer in relation to their smoking prevalence. In addition to active tobacco smoke exposure, other sources of fumes and airborne particles in the indoor environment, such as cooking and burning of incense and mosquito coils, have been considered potential risk factors for lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: We used a case-control study to explore effects of inhalants from combustion sources common in the domestic environment on lung cancer and their modification by active tobacco smoking. METHODS: We analyzed 703 primary lung cancer cases and 1,578 controls. Data on demographic background and relevant exposures were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the hospital. RESULTS: We observed a positive relationship with daily exposure to incense or mosquito coils and to cooking fumes only among smokers, and no association among lifetime nonsmokers. Interactions between smoking and frequency of cooking, or exposure to incense or mosquito coils were statistically significant and consistent with synergistic effects on lung cancer. The odds ratio (OR) comparing smokers without daily incense or mosquito coil exposure with nonsmokers without daily exposure was 2.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-4.21], whereas the OR comparing smokers with daily exposure to the same referent group was 4.61 (95% CI, 3.41-6.24). In contrast, daily exposure to incense or mosquito coils was not associated with lung cancer among nonsmokers (OR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.16). We observed the same pattern of associations for smokers without (OR = 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.51) and with (OR = 4.50; 95% CI, 3.21-6.30) daily cooking exposure compared with nonsmokers, with no evidence of an association with daily cooking exposure among nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that active tobacco smoking not only is an important risk factor for development of lung cancer, but also may cause smokers to be more susceptible to the risk-enhancing effects of other inhalants.