Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 13(7): e16143, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34354883

ABSTRACT

Acute liver failure carries a high mortality. At present, liver transplant is the definitive treatment along with standard medical support. In the absence of or as a bridge to liver transplant, several liver assist therapies have been derived. Some of the therapies have shown short-term mortality benefits and transplant-free survival over standard medical treatment alone. High volume plasmapheresis (HVP) is one of such therapies and is readily available in hospitals. We discuss the case of a 28-year-old female who presented with acute liver failure, did not qualify for the liver transplant and successfully underwent HVP. Various regimens of plasmapheresis have been described in the literature of which we used the HVP for pre-determined three days. Our case emphasizes the importance of early initiation of HVP in an acute liver failure patient who did not qualify for liver transplant, and adds to the existing evidence of the utility of this particular type of plasmapheresis over other regimens.

2.
Am J Med Sci ; 355(6): 524-529, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29891035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of time spent in the emergency department (ED) and process of care on mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted on 117 patients who came through the University of Louisville Hospital ED and subsequently were directly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Variables of interest were time in the ED from triage to physical transport to the ICU, from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered, and from triage to antibiotic(s) administered. Expected mortality was calculated according to the University Health System Consortium Database. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital death and hospital length of stay in days, respectively. RESULTS: We found no significant association between time in the ED and mortality between survivors and nonsurvivors (5.5 versus 5.7 hours, P = 0.804). After adjusting for expected mortality, a 22% increase in mortality risk was found for each hour delay from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered; a 15% increase in mortality risk was observed for each hour from triage to antibiotic(s) given. Both time from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, P = 0.044) and time from triage to antibiotic(s) delivery (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092) were independently associated with an increased hospital stay (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092). CONCLUSION: Though no significant association between mortality and ED time was demonstrated, we observed a significant increase in mortality in septic patients with both delays in antibiotic(s) order and administration. Delay in care also resulted in increased hospital stays both overall and in the ICU.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Sepsis/drug therapy , Aged , Critical Care/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Shock, Septic/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...