Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(5): 882-6, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750988

ABSTRACT

We conducted a population survey in Hong Kong to gauge psychological and behavioral responses to the threat of influenza A(H7N9) and support for closure of live poultry markets. We found low anxiety and low levels of exposure to live poultry but mixed support for permanent closure of the markets.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/psychology , Poultry/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Health Surveys , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Male , Middle Aged , Poultry Diseases , Young Adult
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 169, 2014 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24674239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated associations between psychological and behavioral indices throughout a major epidemic. This study was aimed to compare the strength of associations between different cognitive and affective measures of risk and self-reported protective behaviors in a series of ten cross-sectional surveys conducted throughout the first wave of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. METHODS: All surveys were conducted using questionnaire-based telephone interviews, with random digit dialing to recruit adults from the general population. Measures of anxiety and worry (affective) and perceived risk (cognitive) regarding A/H1N1 were made in 10 serial surveys. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the cognitive/affective-behavioral associations in each survey while multilevel logistic models were conducted to estimate the average effects of each cognitive/affective measure on adoption of protective behaviors throughout the ten surveys. RESULTS: Excepting state anxiety, other affective measures including "anticipated worry", "experienced worry" and "current worry" specific to A/H1N1 risk were consistently and strongly associated with adoption of protective behaviors across different survey periods. However, the cognitive-behavioral associations were weaker and inconsistent across the ten surveys. Perceived A/H1N1 severity relative to SARS had stronger associations with adoption of protective behaviors in the late epidemic periods than in the early epidemic periods. CONCLUSION: Risk-specific worries appear to be significantly associated with the adoption of protective behaviors at different epidemic stages, whereas cognitive measures may become more important in understanding people's behavioral responses later in epidemics. Future epidemic-related psycho-behavioral research should include more affective-loaded measures of risk.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/psychology , Pandemics , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fear/psychology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Perception , Risk Assessment
3.
PLoS One ; 6(11): e27169, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22102878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers in many countries are recommended to receive influenza vaccine to protect themselves as well as patients. A monovalent H1N1 vaccine became available in Hong Kong in December 2009 and around 10% of local healthcare workers had received the vaccine by February 2010. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of antibody to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among HCWs in Hong Kong in February-March 2010 following the first pandemic wave and the pH1N1 vaccination campaign. In this study we focus on the subset of healthcare workers who reported receipt of non-adjuvanted monovalent 2009 H1N1 vaccine (Panenza, Sanofi Pasteur). Sera collected from HCWs were tested for antibody against the pH1N1 virus by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and viral neutralization (VN) assays. RESULTS: We enrolled 703 HCWs. Among 104 HCWs who reported receipt of pH1N1 vaccine, 54% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44%-63%) had antibody titer ≥1∶40 by HI and 42% (95% CI: 33%-52%) had antibody titer ≥1∶40 by VN. The proportion of HCWs with antibody titer ≥1∶40 by HI and VN significantly decreased with age, and the proportion with antibody titer ≥1∶40 by VN was marginally significantly lower among HCWs who reported prior receipt of 2007-08 seasonal influenza vaccine (odds ratio: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-1.00). After adjustment for age, the effect of prior seasonal vaccine receipt was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that monovalent H1N1 vaccine may have had suboptimal immunogenicity in HCWs in Hong Kong. Larger studies are required to confirm whether influenza vaccine maintains high efficacy and effectiveness in HCWs.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Health Personnel , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutralization Tests , Occupational Exposure , Pandemics , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Vaccination , Young Adult
4.
J Infect Dis ; 202(6): 867-76, 2010 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20677945

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the community psychological and behavioral responses to influenza pandemics. METHODS: Using random digit dialing, we sampled 12,965 Hong Kong residents in 13 cross-sectional telephone surveys between April and November 2009, covering the entire first wave of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. We examined trends in anxiety, risk perception, knowledge on modes of transmission, and preventive behaviors. RESULTS: Respondents reported low anxiety levels throughout the epidemic. Perceived susceptibility to infection and perceived severity of H1N1 were initially high but declined early in the epidemic and remained stable thereafter. As the epidemic grew, knowledge on modes of transmission did not improve, the adoption of hygiene measures and use of face masks did not change, and social distancing declined. Greater anxiety was associated with lower reported use of hygiene measures but greater social distancing. Knowledge that H1N1 could be spread by indirect contact was associated with greater use of hygiene measures and social distancing. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of substantial change in preventive measures or knowledge about the modes of H1N1 transmission in the general population suggests that community mitigation measures played little role in mitigating the impact of the first wave of 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in Hong Kong.


Subject(s)
Behavior , Disease Outbreaks , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/virology , Interviews as Topic , Male , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Social Behavior , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...