ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This is a unique case report in medical literature for its detailing of diagnostics of an uncommon presentation of a rapid unexplained bilateral vision loss of a 73-year-old male diabetic patient. This report highlights the crucial role of advanced molecular diagnostics in difficult neurological cases and also elucidates the difficulties involved in diagnosing optic nerve glioblastoma, an exceptionally rare and aggressive tumour. MAIN CONCERNS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS OF THE PATIENT: Slow and progressive loss of vision over 2 months, ultimately developing almost complete visual impairment in both eyes and a defect of right eye field of vision conclusively highlighted that the likely etiology was neuro-ophthalmic. Initially, the conditions were suspected to be an extended spectrum of diabetic eye disease complications but further deterioration was a hint towards something more substantive. PRIMARY DIAGNOSES, INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: This entailed in-depth diagnosis processes that included an MRI and the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. The important discovery was through stereotactic biopsies of the optic nerve revealing a high-grade glial neoplasm. Next generation sequencing confirmed the pathology as IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Despite management, his vision continued to deteriorate. Hence, an aggressive clinical course was followed. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the important learning need in considering glioblastoma of the optic chiasm as part of the differential diagnosis of rapid vision loss, which may present as multifocal brain lesions, especially in cases of rapid loss of vision where initial workup is negative. Quite a useful lesson that can be drawn from this case relates to the diagnostic process with advanced molecular profiling, more attention given to clinical suspicion and cutting-edge diagnostic tools applied in atypical presentation of neurological conditions.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Potential links may exist between vitamin A intake and myopia via various pathways. In this study, we examined the association between dietary vitamin A intake during adolescence and myopia in early adulthood. Methods: We performed a prospective analysis utilizing data collected from participants of the Raine Study Gen2. Dietary vitamin A intake, determined via food frequency questionnaires completed at ages 14, 17, and 20 years, was compared with ophthalmic measurements collected at year 20. Low vitamin A levels were defined as <600 µg/day. Regression models were used to adjust for ocular sun exposure level, educational level, and parental myopia as potential confounders. Results: A total of 642 subjects were analyzed. Although those with adequate vitamin A intakes were less likely to be myopic (P = 0.03), this association became insignificant when adjusted for potential confounding factors in logistic regression modeling (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.52; P = 0.06). Conclusions: There were no significant associations between total vitamin A intakes during adolescence and year 20 refractive errors after adjustment for confounders. Replication of this finding and further investigations are essential to rule out the suggestion that sufficient vitamin A intake during adolescence is associated with lower risk of myopia in early adulthood. Translational Relevance: Our findings are not definitive that ingesting foods high in vitamin A during childhood and adolescence does not have a role for preventing myopia in early adulthood.
