Outcomes of ultra-old vs old patients after hip fracture surgery: a matched cohort analysis of 1524 patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of geriatric hip fractures yields improved functional outcomes with decreased morbidity and mortality. Cohort studies have suggested that the older patients within the geriatric age group have worse outcomes with surgery, However, these studies inherently report inflated risks due to poor handling of confounders and have inadequately age-stratified their geriatric population. AIM: This study aims to investigate the effect of age alone on the 1-year mortality and functional status of geriatric patients after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective single institution cohort study based on the prospectively-maintained registry of hip fracture patients. 2603 patients aged 60 years and above were treated surgically under a geriatric-orthopaedic hip fracture pathway from January 2014 to December 2018. Patients were split into two age groups: ultra-old (≥ 85 years) vs old (< 85 years). Baseline demographics and the ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) status and the Modified Barthel's Index (MBI) were obtained at admission and 1 year after the fracture. Adverse outcomes from the fracture and surgery were recorded during a follow-up period of minimally 2 years. A 2:1 matching process based on the gender, fracture type, ASA status, CCI and MBI categories was conducted. RESULTS: There were 1009 and 515 patients in the old and ultra-old age groups, respectively. 1-year mortality was similar for both age groups (4.0% ultra-old vs 3.6% old, p = 0.703). 30-day morbidity was similar except for higher rates of postoperative pneumonia in the ultra-old (14.0 vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). MBI scores at 1-year were lower in the ultra-old (severe dependence: 16.4 vs 10.0%; p = 0.001). Ultra-old patients were less likely to be community ambulant at 12 months (21.2 vs 36.0%) with the deterioration in ambulatory status significant after correction for baseline status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 1-year mortality of surgically-managed geriatric hip fracture patients older than 85 years of age is not determined by age alone. Patients aged 85 years and above are at higher risk for pneumonia postoperatively. Ultra-old hip fracture patients with an intertrochanteric fracture are more likely to have poorer function at 1 year after hip fracture surgery.

Short-term comparative outcomes between reverse shoulder arthroplasty for shoulder trauma and shoulder arthritis: a Southeast Asian experience.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), first introduced as a management option for cuff tear arthropathy, is now an accepted treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures. Few studies have identified whether the outcomes of RSA for shoulder trauma are comparable to those of RSA for shoulder arthritis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of all patients who underwent RSA at our institution between January 2013 and December 2019. In total, 49 patients met the inclusion criteria. As outcomes, we evaluated the 1-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant shoulder scores, postoperative shoulder range of motion, intra- and postoperative complications, and cumulative revision rate. The patients were grouped based on preoperative diagnosis to compare postoperative outcomes across two broad groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 32.8 months (interquartile range, 12.6-66.6 months). The 1-year visual analog scale, range of motion, and Constant and ASES functional scores were comparable between RSAs performed to treat shoulder trauma and that performed for arthritis. The overall complication rate was 20.4%, with patients with a preoperative diagnosis of arthritis having significantly more complications than those with a preoperative diagnosis of trauma (34.8% vs. 7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent RSA due to a proximal humeral fracture or dislocation did not fare worse than those who underwent RSA for arthritis at 1 year, in terms of both functional and radiological outcomes.

Functional Outcomes of Patients with Schizophrenia After Hip Fracture Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-up from an Institutional Hip Fracture Registry.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia impairs a patient's self-care abilities, which are crucial after a hip fracture. Studies on the outcomes of patients with schizophrenia after a hip fracture are dated. This study aims to investigate the complication rates, 1-year mortality, and functional outcomes of surgically managed hip fractures in elderly patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study based on a prospectively maintained registry of patients with hip fracture. In this study, 3,056 patients who were ≥60 years of age were treated under a geriatric-orthopaedic hip fracture pathway from January 2014 to December 2018. Baseline demographic characteristics and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were obtained at admission and at 6 months and 1 year after the fracture. Complications from the fracture and the surgical procedure were recorded during a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. A matching process (based on age, sex, and the MBI at admission) of up to 6 patients without schizophrenia per 1 patient with schizophrenia was utilized to increase power. Differences in perioperative, 6-month, and 1-year outcomes were compared for significance among surgically managed patients with schizophrenia and patients without schizophrenia. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with schizophrenia were compared with 170 geriatric patients without schizophrenia who underwent a surgical procedure for a hip fracture. Patients with schizophrenia were more likely to be institutionalized postoperatively (26.3% compared with 4.7%; p < 0.001). Patients with schizophrenia had poorer MBI scores at 12 months (76 compared with 90 points; p = 0.006). The 1-year mortality rate was comparable (p = 0.29) between patients with schizophrenia (5.7%) and those without schizophrenia (2.4%). Similar trends in MBI were observed in the conservatively managed group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no increase in postoperative complications after a surgical procedure for a hip fracture in elderly patients with schizophrenia. The 1-year mortality after a surgical procedure for hip fracture is similar in both patients with schizophrenia and those without schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia and hip fracture who were surgically managed had poorer 1-year functional outcomes compared with patients without schizophrenia matched for age, sex, and MBI at admission. This information will be useful in shared decision-making discussions with patients and families. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Feasibility of Anterior Spinal Access: The Vascular Corridor at the L5-S1 Level for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the feasibility of anterior spinal access to the vascular corridor at the L5-S1 junction, by evaluating three crucial anatomical landmarks. This provides a framework for risk-stratification for the clinician during preoperative evaluation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers many advantages for fusion at the L5-S1 junction. However, the variant iliac vasculature may preclude safe anterior access. METHODS: Five hundred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the L5-S1 level were identified, with 379 meeting inclusion criteria. We graded the anterior access into three grades, namely, easy, advanced, or difficult by looking at three important anatomical landmarks-the vascular corridor (narrow if ≤25 mm, medium if 25-35 mm [inclusive], and wide if >35 mm), the left common iliac vein (LCIV) location (grades A-D based on the relative position of the LCIV to the L5-S1 disc space), and the presence or absence of a fat plane. RESULTS: Our results showed that 43.27% of the patients had wide corridor for the anterior access, 19.26% of patients had no fat plane, and 7.65% had a LCIV that extended past the midline of the disc (Grade C, D: >50%). By combining these three factors, 37.20% would have easy anterior access, while a minority (1.85%) would have a difficult anterior access. CONCLUSION: The ALIF at L5-S1 offers significant benefits to the patient. The surgeon should be aware of the dangers in an anterior access by looking at three crucial factors to determine whether the access is easy, advanced, or difficult. Patients with a difficult access should be attempted by experts, vascular access surgeons, or consider an alternative approach to L5-S1.Level of Evidence: 3.

Reliability of the new modified Moro's classification and oblique corridor grading to assess the feasibility of oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

INTRODUCTION: The modified Moro's classification (MMC) of psoas morphology and oblique corridor (OC) grading were recently proposed. Their reliability needs to be tested. METHODS: T2 weighted lumbar disc level axial-cut MRI images of patients with degenerative spondylosis were distributed to five spine surgeons. The inter and intra-rater reliability of MMC and OC grading were calculated based on their ratings. RESULTS: Based on kappa statistics, we inferred that both MMC and OC grading are reliable measures. CONCLUSION: Both MMC and OC grading, in combination, can be used to predict the feasibility of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and aid in patient selection.

The Oblique Corridor at L4-L5: A Radiographic-Anatomical Study Into the Feasibility for Lateral Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional radioanatomical study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence, size, and location of the oblique corridor (OC), and the morphology of the psoas muscle at the L4-L5 disc level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion via the OC has the advantage of avoiding injury to the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus. However, the varying anatomy of major vascular structures and the iliopsoas may preclude a safe oblique access to the L4-L5 level. METHODS: Five hundred axial magnetic resonance images of the L4-L5 disc level were shortlisted. OCs were categorized into four grades: Grade 0 = no corridor, Grade 1 = small corridor (≤1 cm), Grade 2 = moderate corridor (1-2 cm) and Grade 3 = large corridor (>2 cm). OC location was labeled as antero-oblique, oblique, or oblique-lateral. Psoas morphology was categorized based on a modified Moro's classification, where the anterior section was further subdivided into types AI-AIV. Oblique approach was considered nonviable either when there was no corridor due to vascular obstruction (Grade 0) or when the psoas was high-rising (Types AII-AIV). RESULTS: 10.5% of the selected 449 patients had no measurable OC (grade 0) at the L4-L5 level. There were 35% and 37.2% patients with a grade 1and 2 OC, respectively. The location of the OC was anterior oblique, oblique, and oblique lateral in 3.7%, 89.6%, and 6.7%, respectively. According to the modified Moro's classification, 19.4% had a high-rising psoas. Predominantly, psoas was either in line with the disc (Type I; 30.7%) or low-rising (Type AI; 47.4%). CONCLUSION: Twenty-five percent of the patients did not have an accessible OC either due to obstruction by vascular structures or due to a high-rising psoas. Hence, proper evaluation of the relevant anatomy preoperatively is recommended for early adopters of this technique, as varying anatomy precludes universal suitability of oblique lateral interbody fusion for the L4-L5 level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.