Is supervised exercise training safe in patients with anorexia nervosa? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa is an eating disorder that is often preceded by excessive physical activity. As such, exercise is not often prescribed in the clinical management of individuals with anorexia nervosa. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of supervised exercise training in patients with anorexia nervosa. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched from their inception to Week 14 of 2011 using the subject headings 'anorexia' and 'exercise' to identify relevant studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Studies that investigated the effects of inclusion of supervised exercise training in clinical management with usual management in patients diagnosed with anorexia nervosa were included in this review. Case reports were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardised assessment form. Quality assessment was rated for the controlled trials and single-group studies using the PEDro scale and Downs and Black scale, respectively. Fixed or random effect approaches were used to determine effect size, depending on the heterogeneity of the studies. RESULTS: Pooled randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised studies showed no significant effect of supervised exercise training on selected anthropometric measurements, while the single-group studies showed significant improvement in weight and body fat. Although Short Form-36 revealed no training effect, distorted feelings about food and exercise were reduced. Cardiovascular fitness also improved with no decrease in weight. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of exercise training programmes, small sample size (n≤20) for 67% of the trials, and inability to exclude publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of supervised exercise training in the comprehensive management of patients with anorexia nervosa appears to be safe, as no detrimental effect was observed in anthropometry. Strength and cardiovascular fitness were also shown to improve.

Hybrid NOTES colectomy for right-sided colonic tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Given the limitation of surgical access and instrumentation, pure NOTES technique currently appears challenging for colorectal surgery. As such, we would like to determine the technical feasibility and clinical results of hybrid NOTES right hemicolectomy with transrectal extraction of specimen. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After the right-sided colon was fully mobilized and vessels ligated, bowel resection and intracorporeal side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis were performed with endostaplers. The Transanal Endoscopic Operations device was inserted transanally. The resected specimen was removed via the Transanal Endoscopic Operations device through an enterotomy made over the anterior wall of the upper rectum. DISCUSSION: The operation was performed on a 42-year-old woman and lasted 120 minutes; blood loss was 30 mL. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 5. The median pain score was 2 (range, 2-3). Our preliminary experience shows that hybrid NOTES right hemicolectomy is safe and feasible. The technique eliminates the need for mini-laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, and it offers promise in this era of minimally invasive surgery.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer is associated with definite short-term benefits, and is increasingly practised worldwide. The limitations of a pure laparoscopic approach include a relative lack of tactile feedback and long procedural time. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery was introduced in an attempt to facilitate operation by improving the tactile sensation. To date, there is no consensus as to which approach is better. Herein we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with total laparoscopic colectomy (TLC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. METHODS: Adult patients with carcinoma of the caecum and ascending colon were recruited and randomized to undergo either HALC or TLC. Measured outcomes included operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidities, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence and patient survival. RESULTS: Sixty patients (HALC=30, TLC=30) were recruited. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, gender distribution, body mass index and final histopathological staging. No difference was observed between the groups in terms of operating time, conversion rate, operative blood loss, pain score and length of hospital stay. With a median follow-up of 27 to 33 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83%vs 80%, P=0.923). CONCLUSION: HALC is safe and feasible, but it does not show any significant benefits over TLC in terms of operating time and conversion rate. Routine use of the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique in right hemicolectomy is therefore not recommended.

Adipose-derived stem cells from pregnant women show higher proliferation rate unrelated to estrogen.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue contains an abundant population of multipotent adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and has been an excellent source of mesenchymal stem cells for cell therapy and tissue engineering. To ensure successful cell therapies, consistency of stem cell performance across donors is critical. However, the effect of the donor's reproductive status on ASC proliferation rate and differentiation capacity is undefined. METHODS: We investigated whether the yield and function of ASCs are affected by the woman's reproductive status: pregnancy, premenopause or menopause. ASCs were isolated from the abdomen of 15 women and their proliferation rates and differentiation capacities were compared by cell count. The capacity of ASCs to differentiate into the chondrogenic lineage was investigated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the differentiation capacity between the three groups, whereas the proliferation rate of ASCs from pregnant women was significantly higher than from the other two groups (P < 0.05). The proliferation rate of ASCs after estrogen treatment remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher proliferation rate in pregnant women, ASCs showed consistency in cell differentiation capacity and were unaffected by donor status. This suggests that factors other than estrogen are responsible for the difference in proliferation.