Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfusion ; 60(5): 1097-1103, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32154927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: West Nile Virus (WNV) is a member of the Japanese Encephalitis (JE) serocomplex within the Flaviviridae family. We report four whole blood donors and one plasma donor with WNV nucleic acid test (NAT)-reactive donations between September 2018 and November 2019, following recent Japanese Encephalitis virus (JEV) vaccination. CASE SERIES: Cases 1 and 4 had reactive WNV NAT donations 1 day after receiving the JEV vaccine. Case 2 had a reactive WNV donation 3 days after receiving the JEV vaccine. Case 3 had a reactive WNV NAT donation 3 days after returning from Arizona and 1 day after receiving the JEV vaccine. Case 5 had a reactive WNV donation the same day as receiving the JEV vaccine. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WNV screening used the Roche cobas WNV nucleic acid test (NAT) (Roche Molecular Systems). Reference testing on WNV-reactive donations was carried out by the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML). JEV vaccine dilutions were also analyzed. RESULTS: Supplemental NAT was negative for WNV and JEV for Cases 1, 3, and 5. Case 2 had a weak amplification curve for one of two JEV NAT targets. Case 4 was JEV NAT-positive, WNV NAT-negative. Serologic testing on donation specimens for Cases 2, 4, and 5 did not support recent or remote WNV infection. JEV vaccine dilutions were detected by both cobas and supplemental NAT. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend implementing a temporary blood donor deferral following a JEV vaccination, if screening utilizes a WNV assay with the capability of detecting other members of the JE serocomplex.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Encephalitis Virus, Japanese/immunology , Vaccination , West Nile Fever/diagnosis , West Nile virus/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Cross Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Vaccination/adverse effects , Virus Inactivation , West Nile Fever/blood , West Nile Fever/etiology , West Nile virus/genetics , Young Adult
2.
Immunohematology ; 31(4): 159-62, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27187196

ABSTRACT

Correct donor D typing is critical to prevent recipient alloimmunization. No method can detect all variants, and the immunogenicity of many variants is unknown. Routine ABO and D serologic typings are performed in our laboratory by automated microplate testing. Until 2011, routine confirmation of D- status of first-time donors was performed by the manual tube indirect antiglobulin test (IAT); this was replaced by automated solid-phase testing including weak D testing by IAT. Selected donors are investigated by other methods. We describe four weak D type 67 (RHD*01W.67) donors whose samples tested as D- by automated microplate and manual methods but were later determined to be D+ by automated solid-phase and RHD gene analysis. Solid-phase serologic and molecular typing results of all four donors were identical. It was identified that the donors are of English-Irish descent; two are brothers and the others are cousins. Transfusion of blood from one of these donors likely resulted in alloimmunization to D in one of three recipients tested since no other documented exposures were identified. Lookback studies determined that two other D- recipients were not alloimmunized.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Canada , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...