Conventional standard-sized bra with prosthesis or patient's bra with customized hand-knitted external prosthesis after mastectomy: Mixed-methods evaluation of patients' preferences.

INTRODUCTION: In breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction, an external breast prosthesis could aid patients' recovery, improve body image and confidence by helping to regain a symmetrical chest appearance when dressed. However, external breast prosthesis preferences among Asian breast cancer patients were not widely studied. We aimed to compare patients' experience with the conventional commercially manufactured standard-sized (small, medium, large, extra-large) bra and prosthesis versus customized hand-knitted external breast prosthesis with patient's bra after unilateral mastectomy at a tertiary hospital. This is the first such study in Asian women, to our knowledge. METHODS: In this prospective study, participants used the conventional bra-prosthesis followed by the customized one consecutively, each for at least 3 months before they were administered an identical questionnaire at 3 and 6 months respectively. The questionnaire assessed the patients' experience with the prosthesis on the aspects of comfort, body image and satisfaction etc. Patients were also invited for in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Of 155 eligible patients, 148 patients participated with a response rate of 95.5%. 99 (67%) participants preferred the customized prosthesis, while 38 (25.7%) did not. 11 (7.4%) participants were undecided. Seventeen participants underwent in-depth interviews until data saturation on major qualitative themes was achieved. More patients experienced excessive sweating (p < 0.0001), greater discomfort (p = 0.0195) and higher rates of prosthesis dislodgement (p = 0.0269) with the conventional bra-prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Customized external breast prostheses could be an alternative to the conventional ones for breast cancer patients with mastectomy, with additional benefits of less sweating, more comfort and less dislodgement perceived.

Can the size of chest wall recurrence after mastectomy in breast cancer patients predict the presence of systemic metastasis?

Background: One of the manifestations of recurrence after mastectomy is the presentation of chest wall lesion. However, it is unclear if the size of the chest wall recurrence (CWR) is related to the presence of simultaneous systemic metastasis in these patients. We aimed to determine if the size of the CWR could affect the outcome in these patients. Methods: Stage I-III breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy and developed invasive ipsilateral CWR were included. Patients with bilateral mastectomy were excluded. Demographic, radiologic and pathological data were analysed between patients with CWR and simultaneous systemic metastasis versus those with isolated CWR. Results: Of the 1,619 patients treated with mastectomy, 214 (13.2%) patients developed recurrences. 57/214 (26.6%) patients had invasive ipsilateral CWR. 48 patients were analysed after exclusion of patients with missing data. Mean age at diagnosis of first cancer and at recurrence were 55.2 years (32-84 years) and 58.5 years (34-85 years) respectively. 26/48 (54.2%) had CWR with simultaneous systemic metastasis. Mean CWR size was 30.7 mm (6-121 mm) and 21.4 mm (5.3-90 mm) for the patients with simultaneous systemic metastasis and those without respectively (P=0.441). Grade (P=0.0008) and nodal status (P=0.0009) at primary diagnosis, grade (P=0.0011) and progesterone receptor (PR) status (P=0.0487) at recurrence were statistically significant for systemic metastasis in patients with CWR. Conclusions: Biologic factors such as grade of primary and recurrent cancer, PR status of recurrent cancer and nodal status at primary diagnosis, instead of CWR size, were associated with simultaneous systemic metastasis in patients with CWR.

Axillary management of breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrence after mastectomy.

Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on the axillary management of breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrence after mastectomy are unclear. Though sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is possible and may be considered, there is limited data on its usefulness. We aimed to determine if axillary restaging surgery was required in this cohort of patients who developed operable isolated chest wall recurrences after mastectomy. Methods: Breast cancer patients treated at a tertiary institution from 1st September 2005 to 31st October 2017 and developed isolated chest wall invasive recurrences after mastectomy were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded patients with bilateral cancers, concurrent regional or distant metastases, patients without surgery for their chest wall recurrences and patients who were lost to follow-up. The demographics, pathological data and second recurrences were collected from a prospectively maintained database and compared between patients with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), SLNB and no axillary operation. Results: Of the 1,841 patients who underwent mastectomy, 26 (1.4%) patients developed isolated chest wall recurrences. Twenty two eligible patients were analysed. The mean age at diagnosis of the recurrence was 54.7 years (range, 37-84 years). 1, 2 and 19 patients had ALND, SLNB and no axillary operation respectively. On mean follow-up of 38.3 months, no axillary recurrences were noted. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrences after mastectomy, axillary restaging surgery can be safely omitted with no increased axillary recurrences on medium term follow-up. This finding could refine existing guidelines in the management of the axilla for patients with chest wall recurrences after mastectomy.

Patterns of breast cancer second recurrences in patients after mastectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about second recurrences in breast cancer patients, especially in patients with mastectomy. We aimed to determine the risk factors, prevalence and patterns of second recurrence in mastectomy patients after first recurrence. METHODS: Stage I-III breast cancer patients treated at a tertiary institution from 1st September 2005 to 31st October 2017 and developed first and second recurrences after mastectomy were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded patients with bilateral cancers and patients who were lost to follow-up. The demographics, pathological and recurrence data were collected from a prospectively maintained database and analysed. RESULTS: Of the 1619 mastectomy patients, 214 (13.2%) patients developed recurrences at a mean 39.9 months from primary cancer diagnosis. 23, 8 and 183 had isolated chest wall recurrences (CWR), regional and systemic metastases, respectively. Excluding 2 CWR patients without surgery, second recurrences occurred in 3/21 (14.3%) and 3/8 (37.5%) in patients with CWR and regional metastasis at 27.7 months (range: 5-42) and 32 months (range: 18-40), respectively. In both groups, systemic metastasis as second recurrence occurred within 2 years after first recurrence, whilst locoregional second recurrences occurred later. No risk factors for second recurrence were identified. CONCLUSION: In patients with mastectomy, second recurrences occurred in 20.7% of patients with treated locoregional first recurrence, with no risk factors identified. Systemic metastases manifesting as second recurrence occurred in the first 2 years after first recurrence. Continued clinical surveillance and restaging patients in the first 2 years after first locoregional recurrence may enable early prognostication and treatment with the newer metastatic drugs.

Determining the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in reduction of axillary dissection rates in Z0011 trial cohort with high nodal burden.

Background: In breast cancer patients fulfilling the Z0011 trial criteria, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is reserved for patients with a high nodal burden of ≥3 metastatic nodes. In this group of patients, to avoid an ALND, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could be given instead to achieve nodal pathological complete response (pCR). However, the benefit of NACT in achieving nodal pCR and avoiding ALND in this group of patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the nodal pCR rate in this group of patients who otherwise would have needed an ALND. Methods: cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients, with histologically proven nodal metastasis, who underwent NACT were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The sonographic criteria of ≥3 abnormal nodes, which has been reported as highly predictive of high nodal burden, was then used to identify the high nodal burden group. Nodal pCR was determined based on the ALND following NACT. Results: Twenty-four patients with high nodal burden were identified. Mean age was 55.2 years. 91.7% had invasive ductal carcinoma and 29.2% had grade III cancer. 54.2% achieved nodal pCR which was associated with ypT (P=0.006). Nodal pCR was 75%, 70% and 30% in the triple negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2) positive and ER/PR+HER2- tumors, respectively. Conclusions: In the postulated T1-2 breast cancer patients with high nodal burden, needing an upfront ALND, NACT could result in nodal pCR of 54.2%, with higher pCR in certain subtypes. Hence, to minimize ALND risk, NACT should be offered in this high nodal burden group.

Factors influencing decisions on contralateral symmetrisation procedure among patients with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) can cause breast asymmetry. Although contralateral breast surgery to achieve symmetry was offered to these patients, the uptake of symmetrisation was variable. We aimed to determine the factors that deter patients with breast cancer undergoing OBCS from opting for symmetrisation. METHODS: All patients with breast cancer who underwent OBCS of displacement type with no symmetrisation were prospectively surveyed to explore the social, economic, psychological and physical reasons against symmetrisation. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients participated in a survey administered at a mean 21.6 (range 2-47) months after OBCS. A combination of factors, such as worry and desire to treat breast cancer first (67.9%), not being overly concerned about breast cosmesis (57.1%) and fear of pain from additional operation (28.6%), deterred patients from immediate symmetrisation. Worry and desire to treat breast cancer first was the most important single factor for 50% of the patients. Reasons for no delayed symmetrisation included not being overly concerned about breast cosmesis (70.4%), fear of breast cancer recurrence (48.1%) and being happy with current breast cosmesis (33.3%), with the former two reasons equally cited as the single most important deterrent by 30% of patients each. CONCLUSION: A combination of factors may deter patients from symmetrisation. The most significant factors deterring OBCS among patients were worry and desire to treat breast cancer first for immediate symmetrisation, and not being overly concerned about breast cosmesis and fear of breast cancer recurrence for delayed symmetrisation. Reassuring these patients may increase their uptake of symmetrisation, thereby improving patient cosmesis and satisfaction.

Evaluating the feasibility of a novel Marking Breast Oncoplastic Surgery Simulator (MBOSS) as a training tool for marking: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, volunteers and/or anatomical models are used for teaching oncoplastic surgery marking. However, as the breast is an intimate organ, recruiting volunteers is difficult, and the available droopy breast models have limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel Marking Breast Oncoplastic Surgery Simulator (MBOSS) for the teaching of marking. METHODS: Breast/plastic surgeons/trainees, grouped according to their oncoplastic experience, were randomized to MBOSS or volunteer. All had a pre-test evaluation prior to receiving hands-on training in inverted T mammoplasty marking in their randomized group, followed by an assessment of their marking skills, by an examiner blinded to their group assignment. All participants then underwent post-test and course evaluations, and those who used MBOSS for training, also evaluated MBOSS realism. Learning outcomes between the two groups were compared using the Kirkpatrick educational model. RESULTS: Forty participants were enrolled. Demographics, baseline oncoplastic experience and pre-test results were comparable between the MBOSS and volunteer groups. For Kirkpatrick level 1 satisfaction outcomes, the two groups did not differ significantly. For level 2 knowledge assessment, MBOSS post-test scores were significantly higher (P=0.0471). For level 3 skill application and level 4 organizational impact evaluated 6 months post course, there were no significant differences between the groups. Although MBOSS may not mimic the breast completely, 95% of MBOSS-trained participants rated MBOSS as a good training tool and 85% would use MBOSS instead of a volunteer. CONCLUSIONS: MBOSS learning outcomes are comparable to outcomes using volunteers, making MBOSS an alternative for teaching oncoplastic surgery marking.

Would Removal of All Ultrasound Abnormal Metastatic Lymph Nodes Without Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Be Accurate in Patients with Breast Cancer with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

LESSONS LEARNED: Removal of sonographically abnormal (up to 3) metastatic clipped nodes, without sentinel lymph node biopsy, could accurately predict axillary status in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ypT and the first clipped node status were statistically significant factors for nodal pathologic complete response. This novel approach requires validation in larger studies. BACKGROUND: In patients who have node-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could result in nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) and avoid an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Axillary staging, in such cases, can be performed using targeted axillary dissection (TAD) with a low false negative rate. However, identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after chemotherapy can be difficult, and currently, it is the standard to remove only one clipped node in TAD. We aimed to determine if removal of all sonographically abnormal metastatic clipped nodes, without SLN biopsy, could accurately predict the axillary status post neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer with one to three sonographically abnormal metastatic axillary nodes were prospectively recruited. Each abnormal node had histology and clip insertion before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent removal of clipped nodes using the Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique (SMART) and ALND. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were recruited, having a total of 21 sonographically abnormal metastatic nodes, with nine, three, and two patients having 1, 2, and 3 malignant nodes clipped, respectively. Mean age was 55.5 years; 92.9% and 57.1% of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma and grade III tumors, respectively; and 35.7% patients achieved nodal pCR. The first clipped node predicted the axillary status with a false negative rate of 7.1%. Adding to this another second clipped node, the false negative rate was 0%. Pathologic tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypT) (p = .0390) and the first clipped node pathological response status (p = .0030) were statistically significant predictors for nodal pCR. CONCLUSION: Removal of sonographically abnormal metastatic clipped nodes using SMART, without sentinel lymph node biopsy, could accurately predict axillary status. This finding needs validation in larger studies.

Initial results of a novel technique of clipped node localization in breast cancer patients postneoadjuvant chemotherapy: Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique (SMART trial).

PURPOSE: Removal of clipped nodes can improve sentinel node biopsy accuracy in breast cancer patients post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, the current methods of clipped node localization have limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel clipped node localization and removal technique by preoperative skin marking of clipped nodes and removal by the Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique (SMART), with the secondary aim of assessing the ultrasound visibility of the various clips in the axillary nodes after NACT. METHODS: Invasive breast cancer patients with histologically metastatic axillary nodes, going for NACT, and ≤3 sonographically abnormal axillary nodes were recruited. All abnormal nodes had clips inserted. Patients with M1 disease were excluded. Post-NACT, patients underwent SMART and axillary lymph node dissection. Specimen radiography and pathological analyses were performed to confirm the clipped node presence. Success, complication rates of SMART, and ultrasound visibility of the various clips were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-five clipped nodes in 14 patients underwent SMART without complications. The UltraCor Twirl, hydroMARK, UltraClip Dual Trigger, and UltraClip were removed in 13/13 (100%), 7/9 (77.8%), 1/2 (50.0%), and 0/1 (0%), respectively (P = .0103) with UltraCor Twirl having the best ultrasound visibility and removal rate. Removal of three clipped nodes in the same patient (P = .0010) and deeply seated clipped nodes (P = .0167) were associated with SMART failure. CONCLUSION: Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique is feasible for removing clipped nodes post-NACT, with 100% observed success rate, using the UltraCor Twirl marker in patients with <3 not deeply seated clipped nodes. Larger studies are needed for validation.

Milk fistula following puerperal breast abscess.

We present the first reported video of milk fistula. Milk fistula is a rare complication secondary to abscess or breast intervention in lactating women. It is a clinical diagnosis and the treatment is usually conservative, which included cessation of breastfeeding, with a good prognosis.

Oncoplastic round block technique has comparable operative parameters as standard wide local excision: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Although oncoplastic breast surgery is used to resect larger tumors with lower re-excision rates compared to standard wide local excision (sWLE), criticisms of oncoplastic surgery include a longer-albeit, well concealed-scar, longer operating time and hospital stay, and increased risk of complications. Round block technique has been reported to be very suitable for patients with relatively smaller breasts and minimal ptosis. We aim to determine if round block technique will result in operative parameters comparable with sWLE. METHODS: Breast cancer patients who underwent a round block procedure from 1st May 2014 to 31st January 2016 were included in the study. These patients were then matched for the type of axillary procedure, on a one to one basis, with breast cancer patients who had undergone sWLE from 1st August 2011 to 31st January 2016. The operative parameters between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: 22 patients were included in the study. Patient demographics and histologic parameters were similar in the 2 groups. No complications were reported in either group. The mean operating time was 122 and 114 minutes in the round block and sWLE groups, respectively (P=0.64). Length of stay was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.11). Round block patients had better cosmesis and lower re-excision rates. A higher rate of recurrence was observed in the sWLE group. CONCLUSION: The round block technique has comparable operative parameters to sWLE with no evidence of increased complications. Lower re-excision rate and better cosmesis were observed in the round block patients suggesting that the round block technique is not only comparable in general, but may have advantages to sWLE in selected cases.

Development of a surgical algorithm by using pre-operative imaging to predict mammoplasty cosmetic outcomes for large non-malignant tumours.

BACKGROUND: Use of mammoplasty for resection of large non-malignant tumours is not widely described. We aim to determine the optimal tumour to breast size ratio cut-off in this group of patients undergoing mammoplasty which could achieve satisfactory cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent mammoplasty from May 2014 to June 2017 for biopsy-proven large non-malignant tumours were included in the study. The demographics, tumour to breast size ratios, histological features and cosmetic outcomes of these patients were assessed. The tumour to breast size ratio was estimated in ten-percentiles of the relative volume of the tumour to the overall breast size based on ultrasound and/or mammogram images. RESULTS: Ten patients were recruited. Median age was 40 years old (range, 14-55 years old). One, four and five patients underwent vertical, wise pattern and round block mammoplasties respectively. The median tumour to breast size ratio was 55% (range, 20-90%). Histology revealed phyllodes and giant fibroadenoma in six and four patients respectively. Margins were clear in all cases. Mean weight and average maximum size of surgical specimen was 357.9 g (range, 28-1,186 g) and 99.3 mm (range, 35-165 mm) respectively. One patient developed partial nipple necrosis which was treated conservatively. All the patients with an estimated tumour to breast size ratio up to 70% reported good to excellent cosmetic outcomes, except for one patient who had a large tumour occupying 90% of her breast. CONCLUSIONS: Mammoplasty can be used successfully in patients with large non-malignant tumours. However, in patients with tumours occupying more than 70% of the breast, mammoplasty alone may not yield a good cosmetic outcome.