Quantifying Systematic RBE-Weighted Dose Uncertainty Arising from Multiple Variable RBE Models in Organ at Risk.

PURPOSE: Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) uncertainties have been a concern for treatment planning in proton therapy, particularly for treatment sites that are near organs at risk (OARs). In such a clinical situation, the utilization of variable RBE models is preferred over constant RBE model of 1.1. The problem, however, lies in the exact choice of RBE model, especially when current RBE models are plagued with a host of uncertainties. This paper aims to determine the influence of RBE models on treatment planning, specifically to improve the understanding of the influence of the RBE models with regard to the passing and failing of treatment plans. This can be achieved by studying the RBE-weighted dose uncertainties across RBE models for OARs in cases where the target volume overlaps the OARs. Multi-field optimization (MFO) and single-field optimization (SFO) plans were compared in order to recommend which technique was more effective in eliminating the variations between RBE models. METHODS: Fifteen brain tumor patients were selected based on their profile where their target volume overlaps with both the brain stem and the optic chiasm. In this study, 6 RBE models were analyzed to determine the RBE-weighted dose uncertainties. Both MFO and SFO planning techniques were adopted for the treatment planning of each patient. RBE-weighted dose uncertainties in the OARs are calculated assuming ( α ß ) x of 3 Gy and 8 Gy. Statistical analysis was used to ascertain the differences in RBE-weighted dose uncertainties between MFO and SFO planning. Additionally, further investigation of the linear energy transfer (LET) distribution was conducted to determine the relationship between LET distribution and RBE-weighted dose uncertainties. RESULTS: The results showed no strong indication on which planning technique would be the best for achieving treatment planning constraints. MFO and SFO showed significant differences (P <.05) in the RBE-weighted dose uncertainties in the OAR. In both clinical target volume (CTV)-brain stem and CTV-chiasm overlap region, 10 of 15 patients showed a lower median RBE-weighted dose uncertainty in MFO planning compared with SFO planning. In the LET analysis, 8 patients (optic chiasm) and 13 patients (brain stem) showed a lower mean LET in MFO planning compared with SFO planning. It was also observed that lesser RBE-weighted dose uncertainties were present with MFO planning compared with SFO planning technique. CONCLUSIONS: Calculations of the RBE-weighted dose uncertainties based on 6 RBE models and 2 different ( α ß ) x revealed that MFO planning is a better option as opposed to SFO planning for cases of overlapping brain tumor with OARs in eliminating RBE-weighted dose uncertainties. Incorporation of RBE models failed to dictate the passing or failing of a treatment plan. To eliminate RBE-weighted dose uncertainties in OARs, the MFO planning technique is recommended for brain tumor when CTV and OARs overlap.

Comparison of radiomics tools for image analyses and clinical prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Radiomics pipelines have been developed to extract novel information from radiological images, which may help in phenotypic profiling of tumours that would correlate to prognosis. Here, we compared two publicly available pipelines for radiomics analyses on head and neck CT and MRI in nasopharynx cancer (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 100 biopsy-proven NPC cases stratified by T- and N-categories were enrolled in this study. Two radiomics pipeline, Moddicom (v. 0.51) and Pyradiomics (v. 2.1.2) were used to extract radiomics features of CT and MRI. Segmentation of primary gross tumour volume was performed using Velocity v. 4.0 by consensus agreement between three radiation oncologists. Intraclass correlation between common features of the two pipelines was analysed by Spearman's rank correlation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to determine association between radiomics features and clinical parameters. RESULTS: We observed a high proportion of correlated features in the CT data set, but not for MRI; 76.1% (51 of 67 common between Moddicom and Pyradiomics) of CT features and 28.6% (20 of 70 common) of MRI features were significantly correlated. Of these, 100% were shape-related for both CT and MRI, 100 and 23.5% were first-order-related, 61.9 and 19.0% were texture-related, respectively. This interpipeline heterogeneity affected the downstream clustering with known prognostic clinical parameters of cTN-status and GTVp. Nonetheless, shape features were the most reproducible predictors of clinical parameters among the different radiomics modules. CONCLUSION: Here, we highlighted significant heterogeneity between two publicly available radiomics pipelines that could affect the downstream association with prognostic clinical factors in NPC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present study emphasized the broader importance of selecting stable radiomics features for disease phenotyping, and it is necessary prior to any investigation of multicentre imaging datasets to validate the stability of CT-related radiomics features for clinical prognostication.

Are heart doses associated with survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received post-operative thoracic radiotherapy?: A national population-based study.

The aim of this retrospective national cohort study is to assess the association between various radiation heart dosimetric parameters (RHDPs), acute myocardial infarct (AMI) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with post-operative thoracic radiotherapy (PORT) using contemporary radiation techniques.We identified patients with stage I to III NSCLC treated with PORT at the 2 national cancer institutions from 2007 to 2014. We linked their electronic medical records to the national AMI and death registries. Univariable Cox regression was performed to assess the association between various RHDPs, AMI, and OS.We included 43 eligible patients with median follow-up of 36.6 months. Median age was 64 years. Majority of the patients had pathological stage III disease (72%). Median prescription dose was 60Gy. Median mean heart dose (MHD) was 9.4Gy. There were no AMI events. The 5-year OS was 34%. Univariable Cox regression showed that age was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.10; P = .008). Radiation heart doses, including MHD, volume of heart receiving at least 5, 25, 30, 40, 50Gy and dose to 30% of heart volume, were not significantly associated with OS.There is insufficient evidence to conclude that RHDPs are associated with OS for patients with NSCLC treated with PORT in this study. Studies with larger sample size and longer term follow-up are needed to assess AMI outcome.