The Painful Anterior Apprehension Test - an Indication of Occult Shoulder Instability.

Introduction: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the painful anterior apprehension test in shoulder instability. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study of 155 patients that underwent arthroscopic anterior Bankart repair between 2014-2016. Exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery, bony Bankart lesions, glenohumeral osteoarthritis and concomitant surgery involving rotator cuff tears, biceps tendon pathology and superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions. The study cohort was divided into three groups: apprehension test with apprehension only, apprehension test with pain only, and apprehension test with both apprehension and pain. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, radiological imaging, arthroscopy findings and surgical outcomes (Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), SF-36 scores) were evaluated. Results: A total of 115 (74.2%) had apprehension only, 26 (16.8%) had pain only and 14 (9.0%) had pain and apprehension with the apprehension test. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the groups in patients with traumatic shoulder dislocation (p=0.028), patients presenting with pain (p=0.014) and patients presenting with recurrent dislocations (p=0.046). Patients with a purely painful apprehension test were more likely to have a traumatic shoulder dislocation, more likely to present only with pain, and less likely to present with recurrent shoulder dislocations. Multivariate analysis showed that none of these factors alone were significant as single predictors for shoulder instability. All three groups were otherwise similar in patient profile, MRI and arthroscopic assessments, and clinical outcomes of surgery. Excellent clinical outcomes were achieved in all groups with no difference in pre-operative and post-operative scores across all groups at all time points. Conclusion: The painful apprehension test may suggest underlying shoulder instability.

Management of the floating shoulder: Does the glenopolar angle influence outcomes? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no consensus on the optimal treatment of the "floating shoulder". We aim to perform a systematic review to determine outcomes in the management of this condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies related to the management of the "floating shoulder" were identified by a review of medline using platform Pubmed/Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane library data bases. Studies were included if they: (1) are published in the English language and (2) reported outcomes of at least 2 or more cases of floating shoulder injuries using at least one objective shoulder scoring system. Exclusion criteria were (1) non-human and biomechanical studies and (2) studies with a clear selection bias. Three treatment groups were identified. Group 1-non-operative, Group 2-fixation of clavicle only, and Group 3-fixation of clavicle and scapula neck. RESULTS: Thirteen studies gave a population of 244 subjects of which 104 had non-operative treatment, 98 had internal fixation of the clavicle only and 42 had fixation of both the clavicle and the scapula. There were no differences in the outcome scores among the 3 treatment arms as the patients with undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures had conservative treatment and those with displaced fractures were surgically stabilised. There was a positive correlation between the final glenopolar angle and the Constant score. CONCLUSIONS: The review was unable to show a difference in outcomes among the 3 treatment groups. Any treatment modality that restores the glenopolar angle is likely to result in a good outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV.

Modified Brostrom-Evans-Gould technique for recurrent lateral ankle ligament instability.

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of the modified Brostrom-Evans-Gould technique in patients with chronic lateral ankle ligament instability. METHODS: Between August 2003 and June 2005, 20 men aged 19 to 35 (mean, 23) years with chronic lateral instability affecting 21 ankles, underwent the modified Brostrom-Evans-Gould technique by a single surgeon. The mean follow-up period was 12 (range, 6-20) months. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Kaikkonen Ankle Scoring Scale. RESULTS: Preoperatively, all patients had poor scores (<50). Postoperatively, 17 (81%) of the ankles attained excellent scores (85-100) and 4 (19%) attained good scores (70-84). CONCLUSION: The modified Brostrom-Evans-Gould technique appears effective for chronic lateral ankle ligament instability, particularly in the Asian population with a higher prevalence of generalised joint hyperlaxity.