A randomised controlled, feasibility study to establish the acceptability of early outpatient review and early cardiac rehabilitation compared to standard practice after cardiac surgery and viability of a future large-scale trial (FARSTER).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability and feasibility of delivering early outpatient review following cardiac surgery and early cardiac rehabilitation (CR), compared to standard practice to establish if a future large-scale trial is achievable. METHODS: A randomised controlled, feasibility trial with embedded health economic evaluation and qualitative interviews, recruited patients aged 18-80 years from two UK cardiac centres who had undergone elective or urgent cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy. Eligible, consenting participants were randomised 1:1 by a remote, centralised randomisation service to postoperative outpatient review 6 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by CR commencement from 8 weeks (control), or postoperative outpatient review 3 weeks after hospital discharge, followed by commencement of CR from 4 weeks (intervention). The primary outcome measures related to trial feasibility including recruitment, retention, CR adherence, and acceptability to participants/staff. Secondary outcome measures included health-rated quality of life using EQ-5D-5L, NHS resource-use, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) distance, 30- and 90-day mortality, surgical site complications and hospital readmission rates. RESULTS: Fifty participants were randomised (25 per group) and 92% declared fit for CR. Participant retention at final follow-up was 74%; completion rates for outcome data time points ranged from 28 to 92% for ISWT and 68 to 94% for follow-up questionnaires. At each time point, the mean ISWT distance walked was greater in the intervention group compared to the control. Mean utility scores increased from baseline to final follow-up by 0.202 for the intervention (0.188 control). Total costs were £1519 for the intervention (£2043 control). Fifteen participants and a research nurse were interviewed. Many control participants felt their outpatient review and CR could have happened sooner; intervention participants felt the timing was right. The research nurse found obtaining consent for willing patients challenging due to discharge timings. CONCLUSION: Recruitment and retention rates showed that it would be feasible to undertake a full-scale trial subject to some modifications to maximise recruitment. Lower than expected recruitment and issues with one of the clinical tests were limitations of the study. Most study procedures proved feasible and acceptable to participants, and professionals delivering early CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN80441309 (prospectively registered on 24/01/2019).

Changing clinical profiles and in-hospital outcomes of octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery over 18 years: a single-centre experience†.

OBJECTIVES: With an ageing population, increasing numbers of octogenarians are undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery. We examine the changing characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for octogenarians over an 18-year period. METHODS: Clinical data from our prospective database for all octogenarians who had cardiac surgery from March 1999 through May 2016 were reviewed. We examined trends, risk profiles and in-hospital outcomes over 3 eras, namely early (1999-2004), middle (2005-2010) and late (2011-2016). A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1022 patients aged 80-94 years in our study cohort. The octogenarian population increased progressively from early to late eras (4.5%, n = 255 vs 7.1%, n = 321 vs 9.3%, n = 446), as the average logistic EuroSCORE predicted mortality (9% vs 9.7% vs 10.1%, P < 0.01). On the contrary, observed mortality declined substantially (9.4% vs 7.8% vs 4.7%, P = 0.04) over this period. While cardiac morbidity and respiratory comorbidities were more prevalent in the late era, chronic renal failure was more frequent in the early era. Over time, more procedures were performed electively (P = 0.05). Common operations across all eras were coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement and CABG + aortic valve replacement. Emergency operation [odds ratio (OR) 4.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-16.35; P < 0.01], poor ejection fraction (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.80-6.32; P < 0.01) and bypass time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; P < 0.01) were predictors of in-hospital mortality. The late era of surgery (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73; P < 0.01) was associated with reduced mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: The operative outcome in this growing surgical population is steadily improving despite the increasing prevalence of comorbidities, and surgery should be performed electively as much as possible.

The relationship between total arterial revascularization and blood transfusion following coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion adversely affects the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), yet blood transfusion after CABG is still common. Total arterial revascularisation (TAR) is increasingly used in current practice but its impact on postoperative blood transfusion is not known. METHODS: We reviewed the cardiothoracic and blood bank databases and collected data for isolated primary CABG patients from July 2007 to June 2012, excluding patients who had a single graft (n = 148). Perioperative variables of TAR patients (n = 745) were compared with patients who had one or more venous grafts (SVG, n = 1,761) for first-time isolated CABG. The conduits used in TAR patients were predominantly left internal thoracic and radial arteries. Matched group comparison of TAR and SVG patients was performed. The association of TAR with blood transfusion was investigated using multivariate and matched analysis. RESULTS: Of 2,506 patients, the 745 (29.7 %) that had TAR were generally younger, with less complex coronary artery disease and less often diabetic. After correcting for these by 1:1 matching, the mean chest tube drainage and rates of blood transfusion remained significantly lower (p < .0001) in TAR patients. Indeed, red cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma were significantly less frequently transfused in TAR patients. By multivariate analysis, TAR had an independent effect on reducing blood transfusion after CABG [odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97, p = .03]. CONCLUSIONS: TAR achieved predominantly with left internal thoracic and radial arteries substantially reduced blood transfusion rates after primary CABG. Further studies are warranted.

Early and late prognostic implications of coronary artery bypass timing after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after myocardial infarction (MI) is still controversial. With advances in perioperative care and myocardial protection, CABG is not infrequently undertaken sooner. Although CABG soon after MI is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the impact of CABG timing on late survival is not clear. METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data for 8320 patients who underwent primary CABG from 1996 through 2010. Operative outcomes and late survival were compared between patient categories based on MI-to-CABG days: groups A (0-30, n = 658), B (31-60, n = 734), C (>90, n = 2698) and D (no MI, n = 4230). The effect of the timing of surgery on survival was determined using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: As the MI-to-CABG interval increased, the frequency of urgent/emergency operations decreased and hospital mortality (A, 3.5% vs B, 2.6% vs C, 1.2%, vs D, 1.1%, P < 0.0001) steadily declined. In general, patients who had CABG within 90 days of MI had more cardiac morbidity and co-morbidities. Expectedly, therefore, postoperative organ system dysfunction (cardiac, renal, respiratory and neurological) was more frequent in these groups. Reoperation for bleeding was similar for all groups, but blood product transfusion decreased as the MI-to-CABG days increased. The 10-year survival improved with the MI-to-CABG interval (A, 72.2% vs B, 73.4% vs C, 75.8% vs D, 81.4%, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the MI-to-CABG interval was not a risk factor for operative or late mortality. However, less frequent were left internal mammary artery use, non-elective surgery and high blood transfusion rates; all more often associated with shorter MI-to-CABG intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Early and late mortality risk for CABG declines with increasing interval from MI for reasons indirectly linked to the timing of surgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of preoperative organ system optimization and consistent left internal mammary artery use, regardless of the proximity of surgery to MI or the exigency of surgery.

The impact of major perioperative renal insult on long-term renal function and survival after cardiac surgery.

Temporary renal replacement therapy (RRT) facilitates recovery from a major perioperative renal injury and, although RRT can improve the hospital outcome, it is not known as to whether it mitigates long-term renal sequelae. Therefore, we investigated the risk of long-term dialysis after RRT post-cardiac surgery. We analysed prospectively the data collected for all hospital survivors who received RRT following cardiac surgery between March 1996 and July 2010, excluding those on dialysis preoperatively or with a functioning renal transplant. The follow-up data were obtained for all surviving patients. The mean age of the 82 patients was 68.6 ± 9.9 years, and 60 (73%) were male. Severe pre-existing renal dysfunction with a serum creatinine level of >200 µmol/l was present in 15 (18%) patients and diabetes in 31 (38%) patients. Operative procedures included redo surgery (n = 11, 13%) and thoracic aortic surgery (n = 9, 11%). During a 13.4-year follow-up, there were 38 late deaths. Only three patients with severe preoperative renal dysfunction received dialysis. The Kaplan-Meier 5- and 7-year survival rates for this patient cohort were 54% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, a major renal insult requiring temporary RRT after cardiac surgery does not increase the risk for renal dialysis in the long term for patients with normal renal function preoperatively.

Lessons from aprotinin: is the routine use and inconsistent dosing of tranexamic acid prudent? Meta-analysis of randomised and large matched observational studies.

In view of the safety concerns that led to the withdrawal of aprotinin, should antifibrinolytics be used indiscriminately in cardiac surgery? This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety profile of tranexamic acid, and in comparison to aprotinin. We identified randomised trials and large observational studies investigating the use tranexamic acid from January 1995 to January 2009 using Pubmed/Cochrane search engine and included them in a two-tier meta-analysis. There were 25 randomised trials and four matched studies with a total of 5411 and 5977 patients, respectively, reporting tranexamic acid use in varying dosages. Tranexamic acid is administered intravenously either as single dose, infusion or both, sometimes added to pump prime or applied topically. Total intravenous dose of tranexamic acid varies from 1g to 20 g, administered over a period of 20 min to 12h. Compared with placebo, tranexamic acid is associated with a lower mean difference in blood loss (random effect -298 ml, 95% confidence [CI] -367 to -229, p<0.001) and decease in rates of re-operation for bleeding by 48%, transfusion of packed red cell by 47% and use of haemostatic blood products by 67%. A non-significant tendency for postoperative neurological events but a decrease in operative mortality was observed in patients treated with tranexamic acid compared with non-treatment group. Compared to aprotinin, tranexamic acid has less effective blood-conserving effect and mortality risk. Given the potential to increase neurological complications, the current trend towards indiscriminate use of tranexamic acid for all cardiac patients needs to be re-evaluated. Further studies are needed to clarify the neurological risk, appropriate indications and dosing of tranexamic acid.

Early and late prognostic significance of remote and reversible preoperative neurological events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative neurological event with functional impairment is high risk for operative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, data regarding the influence of remote and reversible neurological events on early and late survival are lacking. METHODS: The clinical profile and operative outcome of 5542 patients who underwent first-time CABG from 01 April 1999 through 30 June 2008 were analysed. Late survival data were 100% complete. The relationship between preoperative neurological event and survival (early and late) was investigated using multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: Mean age was 65.2+/-9.2 years, and 494 patients (8.9%) had remote reversible neurological events preoperatively. There were 129 (2.3%) operative and 595 (10.7%) late deaths after a mean follow-up of 4.9+/-2.7 years. Reversible neurological events had strong univariate (odds ratio (OR) 2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-4.33, p<0.0001) and multivariate associations (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.34-3.41, p=0.001) with operative mortality. Although reversible neurological events exhibited a powerful univariate relationship with late deaths (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% CI 1.30-2.12, p<0.0001), this was not maintained after controlling for other factors in multivariable analysis (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97-1.59, p=0.08). Neurological complications, more frequent in patients with preoperative events, were implicated in 25% of operative deaths in patients with preoperative neurological events. The respective 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with reversible neurological events (86% and 68%) were substantially lower than others (91% and 80%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote reversible neurological events increase the risk of fatal and non-fatal postoperative neurological complications. Rigorous measures to improve cerebral protection are warranted in these patients.

To graft or not to graft? Do coronary artery characteristics influence early outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery? Analysis of coronary anastomoses of 5171 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Small coronary size and extensive atherosclerosis pose operative challenges during coronary artery bypass grafting. We investigated the influence of coronary characteristics on early operative outcome. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for 5171 patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting from April 1, 1999, to December 31, 2007, were analyzed. Coronary diameter estimated or probe-gauged intraoperatively was regarded as small if 1.25 mm or less. Coronary atherosclerosis was graded as none/mild or moderate/severe. Their influence on postoperative major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction or reintervention for graft failure, post-cardiotomy shock, and operative mortality, was investigated. RESULTS: Of 14,019 coronary anastomoses, 4417 coronaries (31.5%) were small and 5895 coronaries (43.4%) had moderate/severe atherosclerosis. All grafted coronaries were small in 1091 patients (21.1%). Left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary arteries received grafts in 94.8% of patients (n = 4903), 74.3% of patients (n = 3842), and 72.5% of patients (n = 3751), with corresponding rates of 31.7%, 31.7%, and 32.6% for small-caliber arteries, 44.4%, 33.3%, and 47.2% for moderate/severe atherosclerosis, and 0.6%, 0.5%, and 3.4% for endarterectomy. Postoperative major adverse cardiac events occurred in 236 patients (4.6%). There was no clear evidence that small caliber of half or more distal anastomoses in a patient (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.94; P = .07) increased the risk of a major adverse cardiac event, but incomplete revascularization (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.39; P = .04) and moderate/severe atherosclerosis of the left anterior descending artery (odds ratio 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.87; P = .04) did increase the risk. CONCLUSION: Grafting small coronaries did not significantly increase the risk of an early postoperative major adverse cardiac event, but incomplete revascularization did increase the risk. Our findings support grafting small coronaries when technically feasible to prevent incomplete revascularization.

Survival of cardiorespiratory arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Study objectives were to (1) report the clinical profile of and outcome for patients who experience a cardiorespiratory arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement, and (2) identify factors associated with improved probability of survival. METHODS: We identified 108 consecutive patients who had cardiorespiratory arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement between April 1999 and June 2008. We studied the characteristics of arrests and survivors, and performed a multivariate logistic analysis to determine features associated with survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Cardiac arrest (n = 86) was more common than respiratory arrest (n = 13; unknown cause, n = 9). Cardiorespiratory arrest occurred with decreasing frequency from the day of surgery. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia was the dominant mechanism of cardiac arrest (70% versus 17% for asystole versus 13% for pulseless electrical activity), and the principal causes were postoperative myocardial infarction (n = 46; 53%) and tamponade or bleeding (n = 21; 24%). Resternotomy was performed in 45 patients (52%), cardiopulmonary bypass reinstituted in 14 (16%), and additional grafts constructed in 5 (6%). The causes of respiratory arrest were mainly pulmonary (n = 8) and neurologic (n = 5). Survival to hospital discharge was better for respiratory arrest (69%) than for cardiac arrest (50%). Older age, ejection fraction less than 0.30, and postoperative myocardial infarction decreased the probability of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia was the most common mechanism, and myocardial infarction, the predominant precipitating cause of cardiac arrest after coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. Despite aggressive resuscitation, outcome is poor. Young patients with good left ventricular function had a better probability of survival if they did not suffer a postoperative myocardial infarction.

Non-infective morbidity in diabetic patients undergoing coronary and heart valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Studies of postoperative morbidity in diabetics have focussed on infection; however, autonomic and cardiovascular complications of diabetes potentially increase the risk for non-infective morbidity. We sought to investigate major non-infective early postoperative complications in diabetic patients. METHODS: We identified diabetics who underwent CABG and/or valve operation from 1998 through 2007, and compared their clinical characteristics and outcome with a contemporaneous cohort of non-diabetic patients. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of 1145 diabetics were similar to 5534 non-diabetic patients (mean age 66+/-9 years vs 66+/-10 years, p=0.45, female 27.5% vs 26.7%, p=0.59, respectively). Class III/IV angina symptoms (43.9% vs 34.9%, p<0.0001), intravenous nitrates therapy (10.4% vs 6.6%, p<0.0001), heart failure (24.8% vs 20.4%, p=0.001), prior myocardial infarction (37% vs 31%, p<0.0001), ejection fraction

Cardiopulmonary bypass and left ventricular systolic dysfunction impacts operative mortality differently in elderly and young patients.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgery is higher risk in the elderly. It has been suggested that preoperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) affect elderly and young patients differently. This study investigates the predictive risk of preoperative LVSD and CPB time for operative mortality in the two groups of patients. METHODS: We reviewed the data for 2616 consecutive patients aged >/=70 years and 4078 young patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve surgery between March 1998 and January 2007. Subgroups defined by severity of LVSD (ejection fraction >0.50 [mild], 0.31-0.50 [moderate] and

Changing operative characteristics of patients undergoing operations for coronary artery disease: impact on early outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive nonsurgical revascularization results in high-risk patients presenting for operation at a later stage of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study investigated the effect of temporal changes in operative characteristics on outcomes of surgical revascularization. METHODS: We compared preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of 5633 patients who underwent surgical revascularization for CAD between April 1998 and January 2007, divided into early (1998 to 2002, n = 2746) and late (2004 to 2007, n = 2887) eras. End points were major adverse outcomes (postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, new dialysis) and operative mortality. RESULTS: Median age (66 vs 68 years, p < 0.0001), prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left main stem disease, prior angioplasty, diabetes mellitus, concomitant valve operation, and aprotinin use increased steadily over time. Severe symptoms, nonelective operations, mean number of grafts, postoperative bleeding, reopening for bleeding, and blood transfusion declined. Major complications were evenly distributed between the eras. Operative mortality for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting did not change (2.0% vs 1.8% p = 0.62) despite increasing operative risk (p < 0.0001); there was a 100% reduction in the absolute risk (110% to 210%) over time. The markers for operative difficulties, such as longer bypass times, were determinants of operative mortality and, in addition to other predictors like age and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, were more prevalent in the late era. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary operations are increasingly performed in higher-risk patients; however, surgical revascularization is nearly twice as safe in current practice compared with a decade ago.

Aprotinin in primary cardiac surgery: operative outcome of propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Some recent multicenter series have questioned the safety of aprotinin in primary cardiac operations. We report a large, single-center experience with aprotinin therapy in primary cardiac operations and discuss the limitations and potential confounders of current treatment strategies. METHODS: We compared myocardial infarction, neurologic events, renal insufficiency, and operative death after first-time coronary or valve procedures, or both, in 3334 patients treated with full-dose aprotinin with 3417 patients not treated with aprotinin who underwent operation between March 1998 and January 2007. Further analysis was performed for 341 propensity score-matched pairs. RESULTS: There were substantial differences between the groups. Aprotinin patients were higher risk on account of older age, unstable symptoms, poor ejection fraction, preoperative hemodynamic support, emergency/urgent operations, and combined coronary/valve operations. Postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion were considerably reduced in aprotinin patients, as was median duration of mechanical ventilation. Aprotinin was neither a predictor of postoperative myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, or operative death. Achieving parity between the groups by propensity score matching eliminated the elevated rates of postoperative renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, and operative death observed in aprotinin patients in the unmatched comparison. These adverse outcomes were evenly distributed between matched groups. Conversely, blood transfusion had univariate associations with all adverse outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Full-dose aprotinin use was not associated with myocardial infarction, neurologic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, or death after coronary or valve operations. We observed less postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion, and early extubation with the use of aprotinin.

Mitral regurgitation surgery in heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy: a 24-year experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The long-term benefits of mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are controversial. Herein are reported the results and trends of this surgical approach over the past 24-year period. METHODS: Patients were identified in refractory heart failure due to ICM with NYHA functional class III/IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% and MR who underwent mitral surgery between 1979 and 2002. The early and late outcomes were analyzed and compared for the different surgical eras classified as early (1979 to 1986), middle (1987 to 1994), and late (1995 to 2002). RESULTS: Mitral repair (70%) and replacement (30%) were performed with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (85%) and tricuspid valve repair (7%) in 179 patients (mean age 68 +/- 9 years). The overall one- and five-year survival rates were 84% and 51%, respectively, and the corresponding freedom from recurrent MR after repair 86% and 55%. An increasing number of patients underwent surgery from the early to the late era. Whereas patients more frequently presented with cardiomegaly and renal failure during the early era, they were older, more often had prior CABG, concurrent tricuspid regurgitation and underwent mitral repair during the late era. A progressive improvement was observed in operative mortality from the early to late eras (24%, 11% and 5%, respectively; p = 0.009), and also for the one-and five-year survivals (68%, 85% and 89%; 46%, 43% and 57%, respectively; p = 0.06). Preoperative renal failure and concomitant tricuspid valve repair were predictors of late mortality. CONCLUSION: During the past 24 years, operative results for the surgical correction of MR in patients with heart failure due to ICM have steadily improved. Currently, while the early and mid-term survival are satisfactory the long-term survival is limited, especially when heart failure is complicated by renal failure and severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Are initial valve operations in octogenarians still high-risk in the current era?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The average age of cardiac patients continues to increase. As more octogenarians undergo surgery during the current era, the outcome of valve surgery was investigated to determine the operative risk in these patients. METHODS: Among 350 patients aged > or = 80 years who had initial surgery between 1998 and 2006, a total of 188 (105 females, 83 males) underwent valve surgery. A prospective analysis was conducted of the collected data. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 82 years (IQR: 81-84 years), and over half of them presented with severe symptoms (NYHA class III/IV; n = 96), controlled heart failure (n = 108), hypertension (n = 101) and coronary artery disease (n = 108). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 89 cases (47%). Perioperative hemodynamic support with inotropes was common (47%). Hospital death after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 89) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n = 10) occurred in four patients (4.5%, median additive EuroSCORE 9.0%) and one patient (10%, median additive EuroSCORE 9.8%), respectively. Concomitant CABG led to a doubling of the operative mortality which, for AVR, declined from 5.4% to 3.8% during the latter half of the study period. The median length of stay was 24 h (IQR 21-44 h) in the intensive care unit, and 10 days (IQR 7-14 days) postoperatively. The risk factors for operative mortality were urgent/emergent surgery (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.12-9.58, p = 0.03), preoperative gastrointestinal disease (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.12-8.9, p = 0.03), left ventricular ejection fraction <0.30 (HR 4.37, 95% CI 1.29-14.82, p = 0.02), and ischemic time (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.004-1.07, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Elective isolated AVR can be performed with modest operative risk in octogenarians with good left ventricular systolic function. Additional procedures impose long ischemic times and increase the operative risk, as does MVR. Strategies to minimize the complexity and extent of surgery should benefit these patients.

Early and late survival after surgical revascularization for ischemic ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) treated by myocardial revascularization, often with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator, prevents sudden cardiac death. Early series have suggested that recurrent VF/VT threatens survival even after treatment. As late outcome is unknown, we sought to determine if the early survival benefit is sustained. METHODS: From January 1999 through January 2007, 93 consecutive patients (75 male, 81%) presented with ischemic VF/VT; 21% survived cardiac arrest and underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery at our institution. We analyzed their early and late survival. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years (range, 44 to 88). Clinical presentation included class III/IV angina (46%), controlled heart failure (43%), prior myocardial infarction (68%), left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30 (23%) and 0.30 to 0.50 (35%), left main stem disease (24%), and triple-vessel disease (67%). Surgical revascularization, mostly nonelective (urgent 73%, emergency 7%), was combined with aortic valve replacement in 5 patients and left ventricular pseudoaneurysm repair in 3. Ischemic territories and mean number of diseased coronaries (2.6) corresponded to the grafted territories and average number of grafts (2.5). Operative mortality was 6.5% (n = 6, median EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation] predicted mortality 9). Recurrent VF/VT occurred early postoperatively in 21 patients (24%). All patients had electrophysiologic studies postoperatively and 40% received an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Of 12 late deaths (16%) at follow-up extending to 8 years, 4 (33%) were due to cardiac causes. Five-year survival was 88%, equivalent to that (83% to 85%) reported for patients with sinus rhythm preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Complete myocardial revascularization for ischemic VF/VT yields excellent early and late results; 5-year survival is comparable to that of patients with preoperative sinus rhythm.

Is post-sternotomy percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy a predictor for sternal wound infections?

OBJECTIVE: Early post-sternotomy tracheostomy is not infrequently considered in this era of percutaneous tracheostomy. There is, however, some controversy about its association with sternal wound infections. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had percutaneous tracheostomy following median sternotomy for cardiac operation at our institution from March 1998 through January 2007 were studied, and compared to contemporaneous patients. We identified risk factors for tracheostomy, and investigated the association between percutaneous tracheostomy and deep sternal wound infection (mediastinitis) by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 7002 patients, 100 (1.4%) had percutaneous tracheostomy. The procedure-specific rates were: 8.6% for aortic surgery, 2.7% for mitral valve repair/replacement (MVR), 1.1% for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 0.9% for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Tracheostomy patients differed vastly from other patients on account of older age, severe symptoms, preoperative support, lower ejection fraction, more comorbidities, more non-elective and complex operations and higher EuroScore. Risk factors for tracheostomy were New York Heart Association class III/IV (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.28-16.23, p<0.0001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.01-3.37, p=0.05), preoperative renal failure (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.41-9.01, p=0.007), prior stroke (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.75-5.42, p<0.0001), ejection fraction<0.30% (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.23-6.07, p=0.01), and bypass time (OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.004-1.012, p<0.0001). The incidences of deep (9% vs 0.7%, p<0.0001) and superficial sternal infections (31% vs 6.5%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher among tracheostomy patients. Multivariate analysis identified percutaneous tracheostomy as a predictor for deep sternal wound infection (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.14-9.31, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tracheostomy, often performed in high-risk patients, may further complicate recovery with sternal wound infections, including mediastinitis, therefore, patients and timing should be carefully selected for post-sternotomy tracheostomy.