ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The rate of perineal tears in Cameroonian primiparous women is reported to be up to 59.7%. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between perineal length and perineal tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of primiparous women with singleton pregnancies of at least 36+6 weeks length. The admitting physician measured the length of the perineal body at the first stage of labor and this value was hidden from the delivery personnel until delivery occurred. The presence of perineal trauma and other delivery characteristics were recorded. Data were analyzed using univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean perineal body length was 3.21 ± 0.75 cm (range 1.5-5.5 cm). 34 (33.0%) primiparous women sustained spontaneous perineal tears and 20 (19.4%) had episiotomies. No third- or fourth-degree perineal tears were observed. Perineal body length shorter than 2.5 cm was a significant (P < 0.04) predictor of spontaneous perineal lacerations (58.3% vs. 29.7% with relative risk 0.59). Both duration of second stage of labor longer than 60 min and occiput posterior presentation were associated with an increased risk of episiotomy in primiparous patients. CONCLUSION: Perineal body length less than 2.5 cm significantly predisposed to spontaneous perineal lacerations.
Subject(s)
Lacerations , Obstetric Labor Complications , Delivery, Obstetric , Episiotomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Lacerations/prevention & control , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/prevention & control , Perineum/injuries , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Several studies report that only 10% of Cameroonian women at risk have ever been screened for this disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the factors explaining the difficulties in accessing screening for cervical cancer in Yaoundé, Cameroon. METHODOLOGY: This was an analytical cross-sectional study (participed/not participated), conducted from May 1 to August 10, 2020. The study population was made up of two groups (i.e. women without a history of screening; women who benefited from at least one screening session). Data collection was carried out at the gynecology-obstetrics department in two hospitals in Yaoundé (University hospital center and the obstetrics-gynecology and pediatric hospital). Variables were collected using a pre-tested and validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Simple and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of different variables on the risk of not participating in screening. A difference was considered significant if P < 5%. RESULTS: Out of 300 women interviewed, 150 had never participated in screening (50%). In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with difficulties in accessing cervical cancer screening were, level of primary education (58,33% vs. 41,67%, [AOR: 5.12 (3.42-7.65)]), lack of employment (69,74% vs. 30,26%, [AOR: 5.44 (3.32-8.92)]), insufficient knowledge (78,64% vs. 21,36%; [AOR: 7.11(5.70-8.88)]) and unfavourable attitude (85,71% vs. 14,29%, [AOR: 5.58 (4.41-7.06)]). CONCLUSION: There are many factors associated with not being screened. It is therefore necessary to develop strategies to improve access to cervical cancer screening services in Cameroon.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Health Services Accessibility , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Cameroon , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & controlABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2017/7130479.].
ABSTRACT
In many developing countries like Cameroon, unsafe abortion is a major public health problem. It can be responsible for severe complications including damage to the digestive and/or urinary tract, sepsis, and uterine perforation. Uterine perforation could be caused by most of the instruments that are used to evacuate the uterus. We report a case of apparent uterine perforation and subsequent migration of the plastic or rubber catheter into the peritoneal cavity during an abortion procedure performed in a setting that may have been unsafe. The discovery was made during a diagnostic laparoscopy indicated for secondary infertility of tubal origin 16 years after the abortion procedure. This is a rare clinical finding which is of therapeutic and diagnostic importance. To the best of our knowledge, a single similar case has been reported so far in the literature.
