Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in dental CBCT. METHODS: 20 cylindrical bone samples underwent CBCT scanning (3D Accuitomo 170; J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) using three combinations of tube voltage (kV) and tube current-exposure time product (mAs), corresponding with a CT dose index of 3.4 mGy: 90 kV and 62 mAs, 73 kV and 108.5 mAs, and 64 kV and 155 mAs. Images were reconstructed with a voxel size of 0.080 mm. In addition, the 90 kV scan was reconstructed at voxel sizes of 0.125, 0.160, 0.200, 0.250 and 0.300 mm. The following parameters were measured: bone surface (BS) and bone volume (BV) per total volume (TV), fractal dimension, connectivity density, anisotropy, trabecular thickness (Tb. Th.) and trabecular spacing (Tb. Sp.), structure model index (SMI), plateness, branches, junctions, branch length and triple points. RESULTS: For most parameters, there was no significant effect of the kV value. For BV/TV, "90 kV" differed significantly from the other kV settings; for SMI, "64 vs 73 kV" was significant. For BS/TV, fractal dimension, connectivity density, branches, junctions and triple points values incrementally decreased at larger voxel sizes, whereas an increase was seen for Tb. Th., Tb. Sp., SMI and branch length. For anisotropy and plateness, no (or little) effect of voxel size was seen; for BV/TV, the effect was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Most bone structure parameters are not affected by the kV if the radiation dose is constant. Parameters dealing with the trabecular structure are heavily affected by the voxel size.

Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.

OBJECTIVES: To compare microarchitecture parameters of bone samples scanned using micro-CT (µCT) to those obtained by using CBCT. METHODS: A bone biopsy trephine bur (3 × 10 mm) was used to remove 20 cylindrical bone samples from 20 dry hemimandibles. Samples were scanned using µCT (µCT 35; SCANCO Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) with a voxel size of 20 µm and CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170; J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) with a voxel size of 80 µm. All corresponding sample scans were aligned and cropped. Image analysis was carried out using BoneJ, including the following parameters: skeleton analysis, bone surface per total volume (BS/TV), bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), connectivity density, anisotropy, trabecular thickness and spacing, structure model index, plateness and fractal dimension. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients (R) were calculated. CBCT values were then calibrated using the slope of the linear fit with the µCT values. The mean error after calibration was calculated and normalized to the standard deviation of the µCT values. RESULTS: R-values ranged between 0.05 (plateness) and 0.83 (BS/TV). Correlation was significant for both Spearman and Pearson's R for 8 out of 16 parameters. After calibration, the smallest normalized error was found for BV/TV (0.48). For other parameters, the error range was 0.58-2.10. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall correlation, this study demonstrates the uncertainty associated with using bone microarchitecture parameters on CBCT images. Although clinically relevant parameter ranges are not available, the errors found in this study may be too high for some parameters to be considered for clinical application.